Why Didn't God Personally Write the Bible and Simply Give the Completed Text to Humans?

"Wouldn't the Bible be so much easier to understand if God had written it all himself?" "Why did God choose to use such a messy process to provide us with Scripture?" "Were the human authors of Scripture merely acting in the capacity of amanuenses - taking Divine dictation?" "As Scripture clearly contains a number of errors and contradictions, doesn't that prove that humans wrote it, and that God didn't have anything to do with writing it?" "Is Scripture really inerrant - perfect and without flaws?" "What did Paul mean when he wrote that "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work"?

I think that we can all agree that the answers to those questions are important. In other words, are the fundamentalists right about Scripture? Should all "true" Christians accept their narrative about the Bible and stop asking questions which only serve to undermine Scripture? Should we just ignore all of the evidence which those "nasty" Atheists insist makes the Bible irrelevant? For me, many of these questions represent a two-dimensional way of thinking. Everything is either - or! Unfortunately, for many of these folks there isn't any nuance - there is no middle ground!

If we take an honest and objective look at Scripture, we are forced to conclude that God has always worked with and through humans. Even with the Israelites, God used fallible humans to accomplish his will. Clearly, God had the ability to hand them everything on a silver platter. He could have given them a Tabernacle, an Ark of the Covenant, linen garments for the priesthood, and all of the altars, tables, and furnishings that went with them. We notice, however, that God told them how to make those things with their own hands. Instead of handing them a perfectly constructed and furnished Tabernacle, HE chose to employ human artisans to fashion those things. Why? Surely God knew that there would be imperfections inherent with anything touched by human hands - right? Yet, God wanted his people, his children, to have a part in what he was doing with them. God wanted them to be INVOLVED! Now, as a former teacher, I can see all kinds of value in doing things that way. Can't you? Doesn't everything have a greater impact when there is purchase, ownership?

Recently, I found an article on beliefnet by Duncan Pile titled Why Did God Use Man to Write the Bible Instead of Writing It Himself? In fact, I found the article to be so insightful on this subject that I wanted to share a few excerpts from it with my readers (many of whom are Fundamentalists and think my perspective on Scripture is illogical).

Pile wrote: "The Bible is best understood as the unfolding story of humankind's relationship with and understanding of God. For example, Old Testament believers didn't differentiate between God and Satan, seeing Satan as God's left hand. In the New Testament, we see Christ overcoming temptation, destruction, and death. We are told to resist the Devil, and he will flee, to stand against his wiles and bad intentions. In fact, Jesus differentiated between God (himself) and the Devil in the clearest possible terms, declaring that the thief (the Devil) "comes to steal, kill, and destroy," but Jesus (the perfect expression of the Father) came "that we might have life, and have it to the full." He went on to conclude that "The Bible then reveals the unfolding of humankind's understanding of God, and as such, it is more powerful and instructive than a simple set of theological statements could ever be, even if dictated by God Himself. We get to see humankind's knowledge of God evolve, and the crux of that unfolding is Jesus Himself—His words, deeds, death, resurrection, and ascension. Jesus is the climax of the story, the answer to all questions, the clarity that blows away theological confusion."

According to Pile, God wants us to think - consider things. He wrote: "Another inference we can draw from the way in which Christian scripture was formed is that God wants us to use our brains when interpreting it. In 2 Timothy 2:15, Paul encourages Timothy to be diligent in "rightly dividing the word of truth," which means to understand the context of what has been written and apply it in the light of other scriptural principles and covenants as well. Again, Jesus is our perfect example of this. In the Sermon on the Mount, He taught the crowd to disregard specific instructions of Hebrew Law. Matthew 5:38-45" Pile went on to observe that "Jesus diligently divided the word of truth, understanding that Old Testament teachings were to be overruled by grace. On another occasion, the Pharisees criticized Him for breaking the rules of the Sabbath, saying that what he was doing was "unlawful." Jesus responded by giving an Old Testament example of King David doing the same and concluded that "The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath." Jesus let the Holy Spirit be His guide and boiled the entire Hebrew Law down to loving God with all our hearts, souls, minds, and strength and loving our neighbors as ourselves. It would be foolish to see these examples as slight reinterpretations. We cannot study the Gospels honestly without accepting that Jesus reinterpreted and overrode the Law as part of his teaching and ministry, calling us instead to love."

According to Pile, the real fault lies in the way that many Christians regard Scripture. He wrote: "This might come as a shock, but it is entirely unbiblical to call the Bible the Word of God when the Bible itself only uses that title to refer to Jesus (John 1:1-5). Jesus is the Word of God, so why on Earth do we refer to the Bible that way? The truth is that the books of the Bible reflect the perspective and limitations of each writer, as well as their place in the unfolding of humankind's understanding of the nature of God. It is beautiful, full of inspiration and power for personal growth. It brims over with wisdom and calls us to love, but only when personally interpreted to us by the Holy Spirit. We have made the Bible God – unquestionable, perfect, immortal – rather than use it as a resource to draw near to God himself. It might even be true that we have flirted with idolatry, preferring to exalt the word of God over the living Word of God, who is Jesus Himself."

Let's be honest. Too many of us completely ignore the contributions of the humans who participated in this joint project with God. Too many of us regard the inspiration of the Holy Spirit as conferring infallibility on the men and women who actually wrote the collection of writings we call The Holy Bible. We do this, even though we know that the Holy Spirit leads, guides, and pushes - It NEVER controls. It is NOT the equivalent of demon possession - God simply does NOT work that way! Look at what Paul wrote to Timothy (probably through an amanuenses). Are we reading things into what he actually said?

In his article, Pile concentrated on the way that Christ used Scripture. He wrote: "His parents found Him at the temple in Jerusalem, debating the scriptures with His elders; He read from Isaiah 61 to announce the beginning of His ministry, and He used scripture to send Satan packing in the wilderness. Jesus saw the scriptures as essential to a life of faith, keeping them close to His heart, but He didn't see them as beyond question. By publicly reinterpreting them, He encouraged others (along with us) to think for themselves. We are to approach the Bible with our hearts tuned to His love and our ears turned to the Holy Spirit. Just as Jesus did, we are called to meditate in the scriptures, know them, fill our hearts with them, and use them to turn aside evil." He went on to conclude: "This empowering, spiritual dynamic would not exist if God had delivered a single, downloaded scriptural document. We would not understand our place in the unfolding of humankind's understanding of God, as perfectly displayed in Jesus. God does not require that his children switch off their brains and unquestioningly accept the dogma given to us. He wants enlivened, intellectually engaged, empowered, Spirit-led believers who grow increasingly like Jesus."

Is Lonnie out on a limb with his condemnation of Christian Nationalism?

As longtime readers of this blog know, I have been writing extensively over the last few years about the dangers inherent to mixing the Gospel with politics - of combining the Christian religion with our civic one. Of course, this thesis has predictably received a great deal of pushback from many of those who have actively engaged in this behavior. Even so, I am not alone in my perspective on this issue. In short, there are many highly respected theological voices who share my views and believe that Christians who have mixed politics with religion have been drawn into some damnable heresies as a consequence of doing so!

Along those lines, I ran across an excellent article dealing with this very subject from the perspective of the United Kingdom by Dr Eddie Arthur (Wycliffe Bible Translators), Beware of Weaponizing Christianity Against Immigrants and Denying the Reality and Meaning of the Gospel. For the casual reader, I have lifted a couple of pertinent excerpts from that article and have included them here:

The Bible is strangely silent on the notion of “Christian countries”. But there are numerous warnings about trusting “earthly powers” rather than God, and Scripture makes it abundantly clear that it is God who is in control, not nations, presidents, kings, oligarchs, or technocrats.

With that in mind, let’s think about the nature of the church itself. The first miracle of the church age was on the day of Pentecost, where people from across the Middle East were able to hear the message of the Apostles in their own languages. This is a clear indication that God desires the church to be a multicultural, multilingual entity.

Naturally enough, there were plenty of Jewish believers who were not convinced by this; they believed that the Jesus was a Jewish messiah and that the only way to join his movement was effectively to become Jewish. The Apostle Paul, who was himself a Rabi—trained in the best schools—led the charge against these Judaizers (as they were termed).

The battle between those who insisted that new Christians had to follow Jewish laws and Paul is waged on the pages of the Acts of the Apostles and in Paul’s epistles. It is in Revelation chapter 7 that we see Paul’s vision finally worked out:

"After this I looked, and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb."

The church is composed of people from every nation, tribe, people and language. No one nation—not even the Jews—can claim special privilege. Salvation is through faith in Jesus, and this is independent of where you were born, or where your citizenship lies.

Pushing this on a bit further, a Christian’s primary allegiance lies with Christ, not with the nation they hail from. Our citizenship is in heaven (Phil 3:20). The book of Revelation contains a narrative in which the Empires of the world—powerful nations—are shown to be at enmity with God and his kingdom.

The only Christian country is the heavenly one that God’s people are called to.

There is nothing to stop a Christian from being patriotic, from supporting their national football team or having a deep love of the landscape and culture of their homeland. However, we must always be realistic and realize that our first loyalty is to Jesus and the Kingdom of God and that all human systems are fallen. The only Christian country is the heavenly one that God’s people are called to.

To claim that Britain has (or had) some special status as a Christian nation and that we should therefore oppose people from other countries, cultures and faiths coming here is a denial of the very nature of the Christian faith. Be as anti-foreigner and anti-immigrant as you like, but don’t do it in the name of Jesus. And if you are a Christian, you’d better get used to the idea of being around people from other lands, because eternity is going to be full of them!

Hence, we can see that the notion that Christianity and politics should NOT mix is NOT outlandish or irregular. Moreover, just because a bunch of Evangelicals and Armstrongites have jumped into the political arena with enthusiasm, does NOT mean that they are right! Indeed, many of us believe that a rather large number of Christians are deceived on this front and have unwittingly abandoned and/or seriously compromised many of the basic tenets of their faith.

What other nation is like the United States? Who can stand against its military might?

The whole earth marveled as they followed the beast. And they worshiped the dragon, for he had given his authority to the beast, and they worshiped the beast, saying, “Who is like the beast, and who can fight against it?” And the beast was given a mouth uttering haughty and blasphemous words...It opened its mouth to utter blasphemies against God, blaspheming his name and his dwelling, that is, those who dwell in heaven. Also, it was allowed to make war on the saints and to conquer them. And authority was given it over every tribe and people and language and nation, and all who dwell on earth will worship it, everyone whose name has not been written before the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who was slain. --Revelation 13:3-8, ESV

Like the cities of Rome and Babylon before them, Washington D.C. and New York exert a wide-ranging influence on the other cities of the world. The United States thinks of itself as special - the greatest nation on earth! Western democracies (and most other nations) think of the U.S. as the "leader of the free world." The U.S. dollar remains the most important reserve currency for the majority of the other nations on this planet. In terms of the global economy, it is said that "when America sneezes, the rest of the world catches a cold." Since the end of the Second World War, the U.S. has maintained its position as having the most powerful military among the nations of the earth. Indeed, most of the rest of the world stands in awe of (or resents) the economic and military power of the United States of America.

What about the haughty and blasphemous words? I seriously considered offering a few quotes from American statesman about the "greatness" of the United States and the unequaled might of its military; but the more I contemplated that and considered many of the available quotes, the more the exercise seemed unnecessary. After all, anyone reading this who has not heard such statements repeatedly over the course of his/her lifetime would have to have been living under a rock since birth! Moreover, the notion of America as the "Promised Land," "Shining City," "indispensable nation," "Blessed," or the preeminent "Christian Nation" on the face of the earth is both false and sacrilegious.

In past posts on this blog, we have looked at many of the sins which the United States has committed over the course of its long history as a nation (and continues to indulge in up to the present day). Although we will not recount that list here, the fact of those sins make statements like: "In God we trust," "God Bless America," "So help me God," "one nation under God," "God's country," "God shed his grace on thee," "May God thy gold refine," and "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" clearly blasphemous! Take just a moment to consider: Is it a small matter to associate the United States with the favor of Almighty God? Is it respectful and honest to associate a sinful nation, its government, and economic system with a Holy and Righteous God? Don't such statements clearly constitute blasphemy? What do you think?

What about making war on the saints? How has this "Christian" nation done that? Have you ever heard of Christian Nationalism? How many times have we heard the phrase "God and country"? Paul Miller, in an article for Christianity Today wrote: "Christian nationalism is the belief that the American nation is defined by Christianity, and that the government should take active steps to keep it that way." Likewise, for the United Methodist Church, the Reverend Ryan Dunn observed that "'Christian nationalism identifies the nation with God's will and action in the world; conflates national and Christian identity; and identifies service of the nation with service of God,' writes Dr. David W. Scott, who is a Methodist historical researcher and the Director of Mission Theology at the General Board of Global Ministries of The United Methodist Church. 'Christian nationalism gives moral cover for actions, even unseemly ones, taken in pursuit of national or political goals.'" (What is Christian Nationalism?)

Another article on Christianity.com quotes a number of theologians on the subject, one of which defines the term in this way: "a cultural framework that idealizes and advocates a fusion of Christianity with American civic life. It contends that America has been and should always be distinctively Christian from top to bottom—in its self-identity, interpretations of its own history, sacred symbols, cherished values, and public policies—and it aims to keep it that way. But, the Christian in Christian Nationalism is more about identity than religion. It carries with it assumptions about nativism, white supremacy, authoritarianism, patriarchy, and militarism." In an attempt to answer the question, "Is Christian Nationalism Biblical?" - the same article informs us that "Jesus said to 'render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s' (Matthew 22:21). When people are so tied up in their ideal of nation-building, their focus moves away from kingdom-building (heavenly kingdom building), becoming a 'my way or the highway' mentality. The nation we serve here on earth is not the still-to-come kingdom of God. Christian Nationalism serves no purpose but to promote one’s misguided motives. This is not the action our Lord Christ commanded us to obey (Matthew 28:19-20; John 13:35, etc.)."

In other words, the Christian religion has been twisted and perverted to support allegiance to the United States of America! Jesus once said that "you cannot serve two masters" simultaneously (Matthew 6:24). What about you? Do you serve the beast? OR Do you serve God and his Kingdom?

Unlike many of the articles which deal with prophecy elsewhere, this article was NOT intended to suggest that the United States of America is THE BEAST of the "end times." It is meant to suggest that the U.S. fits the prophetic mold of the biblical symbols of human governance and its character.

The Trinity: Early and Widely Accepted

I am offering the following quotations from the early Church which suggest a very early and widespread acceptance of the doctrine of the Trinity. In particular, the first two quotations (Didache and Justin) seem to affirm this statement attributed to Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew: "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit..." (Matthew 28:19)

The Didache (50-120) has this to say about baptism:

And concerning baptism, baptize this way: Having first said all these things, baptize into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in living water. But if you have no living water, baptize into other water; and if you cannot do so in cold water, do so in warm. But if you have neither, pour out water three times upon the head into the name of Father and Son and Holy Spirit.

In his First Apology, Justin Martyr (100-165) had this to say about Christian baptism:

And for this [rite] we have learned from the apostles this reason. Since at our birth we were born without our own knowledge or choice, by our parents coming together, and were brought up in bad habits and wicked training; in order that we may not remain the children of necessity and of ignorance, but may become the children of choice and knowledge, and may obtain in the water the remission of sins formerly committed, there is pronounced over him who chooses to be born again, and has repented of his sins, the name of God the Father and Lord of the universe; he who leads to the laver the person that is to be washed calling him by this name alone. For no one can utter the name of the ineffable God; and if any one dare to say that there is a name, he raves with a hopeless madness. And this washing is called illumination, because they who learn these things are illuminated in their understandings. And in the name of Jesus Christ, who was crucified under Pontius Pilate, and in the name of the Holy Ghost, who through the prophets foretold all things about Jesus, he who is illuminated is washed.

In his "Against Heresies," Iranaeus (Bishop of Lyon, 130-202) wrote:

The Church, though dispersed throughout the whole world, even to the ends of the earth, has received from the apostles and their disciples this faith: [She believes] in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are in them; and in one Christ Jesus, the Son of God, who became incarnate for our salvation; and in the Holy Spirit, who proclaimed through the prophets the dispensations of God, and the advents, and the birth from a virgin, and the passion, and the resurrection from the dead, and the ascension into heaven in the flesh of the beloved Christ Jesus, our Lord, and His [future] manifestation from heaven in the glory of the Father to gather all things in one, Ephesians 1:10 and to raise up anew all flesh of the whole human race, in order that to Christ Jesus, our Lord, and God, and Saviour, and King, according to the will of the invisible Father...

In Theophilus (Bishop of Antioch, 169-183) to Autolychus, the Trinity is mentioned as widely accepted doctrine.

In his "Against Praxeas," Tertullian (155-220) wrote this about the Trinity:

In the course of time, then, the Father forsooth was born, and the Father suffered, God Himself, the Lord Almighty, whom in their preaching they declare to be Jesus Christ. We, however, as we indeed always have done (and more especially since we have been better instructed by the Paraclete, who leads men indeed into all truth), believe that there is one only God, but under the following dispensation, or οἰκονομία, as it is called, that this one only God has also a Son, His Word, who proceeded from Himself, by whom all things were made, and without whom nothing was made. Him we believe to have been sent by the Father into the Virgin, and to have been born of her — being both Man and God, the Son of Man and the Son of God, and to have been called by the name of Jesus Christ; we believe Him to have suffered, died, and been buried, according to the Scriptures, and, after He had been raised again by the Father and taken back to heaven, to be sitting at the right hand of the Father, and that He will come to judge the quick and the dead; who sent also from heaven from the Father, according to His own promise, the Holy Ghost, the Paraclete, the sanctifier of the faith of those who believe in the Father, and in the Son, and in the Holy Ghost. That this rule of faith has come down to us from the beginning of the gospel, even before any of the older heretics, much more before Praxeas, a pretender of yesterday, will be apparent both from the lateness of date which marks all heresies, and also from the absolutely novel character of our new-fangled Praxeas. In this principle also we must henceforth find a presumption of equal force against all heresies whatsoever — that whatever is first is true, whereas that is spurious which is later in date. But keeping this prescriptive rule inviolate, still some opportunity must be given for reviewing (the statements of heretics), with a view to the instruction and protection of various persons; were it only that it may not seem that each perversion of the truth is condemned without examination, and simply prejudged; especially in the case of this heresy, which supposes itself to possess the pure truth, in thinking that one cannot believe in One Only God in any other way than by saying that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost are the very selfsame Person. As if in this way also one were not All, in that All are of One, by unity (that is) of substance; while the mystery of the dispensation is still guarded, which distributes the Unity into a Trinity, placing in their order the three Persons— the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost: three, however, not in condition, but in degree; not in substance, but in form; not in power, but in aspect; yet of one substance, and of one condition, and of one power, inasmuch as He is one God, from whom these degrees and forms and aspects are reckoned, under the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. How they are susceptible of number without division, will be shown as our treatise proceeds.

Augustine "On the Trinity"

St. Augustine of Hippo lived from 354-430

The following excerpt is the entire 4th chapter:

7. All those Catholic expounders of the divine Scriptures, both Old and New, whom I have been able to read, who have written before me concerning the Trinity, Who is God, have purposed to teach, according to the Scriptures, this doctrine, that the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit intimate a divine unity of one and the same substance in an indivisible equality; and therefore that they are not three Gods, but one God: although the Father has begotten the Son, and so He who is the Father is not the Son; and the Son is begotten by the Father, and so He who is the Son is not the Father; and the Holy Spirit is neither the Father nor the Son, but only the Spirit of the Father and of the Son, Himself also co-equal with the Father and the Son, and pertaining to the unity of the Trinity. Yet not that this Trinity was born of the Virgin Mary, and crucified under Pontius Pilate, and buried, and rose again the third day, and ascended into heaven, but only the Son. Nor, again, that this Trinity descended in the form of a dove upon Jesus when He was baptized; nor that, on the day of Pentecost, after the ascension of the Lord, when there came a sound from heaven, as of a rushing mighty wind, the same Trinity sat upon each of them with cloven tongues like as of fire, but only the Holy Spirit. Nor yet that this Trinity said from heaven, You are my Son, whether when He was baptized by John, or when the three disciples were with Him in the mount, or when the voice sounded, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again; but that it was a word of the Father only, spoken to the Son; although the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, as they are indivisible, so work indivisibly. This is also my faith, since it is the Catholic faith.

The following excerpt is the entire 6th chapter:

9. They who have said that our Lord Jesus Christ is not God, or not very God, or not with the Father the One and only God, or not truly immortal because changeable, are proved wrong by the most plain and unanimous voice of divine testimonies; as, for instance, In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. For it is plain that we are to take the Word of God to be the only Son of God, of whom it is afterwards said, And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, on account of that birth of His incarnation, which was wrought in time of the Virgin. But herein is declared, not only that He is God, but also that He is of the same substance with the Father; because, after saying, And the Word was God, it is said also, The same was in the beginning with God: all things were made by Him, and without Him was not anything made. Not simply all things; but only all things that were made, that is; the whole creature. From which it appears clearly, that He Himself was not made, by whom all things were made. And if He was not made, then He is not a creature; but if He is not a creature, then He is of the same substance with the Father. For all substance that is not God is creature; and all that is not creature is God. And if the Son is not of the same substance with the Father, then He is a substance that was made: and if He is a substance that was made, then all things were not made by Him; but all things were made by Him, therefore He is of one and the same substance with the Father. And so He is not only God, but also very God. And the same John most expressly affirms this in his epistle: For we know that the Son of God has come, and has given us an understanding, that we may know the true God, and that we may be in His true Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.

10. Hence also it follows by consequence, that the Apostle Paul did not say, Who alone has immortality, of the Father merely; but of the One and only God, which is the Trinity itself. For that which is itself eternal life is not mortal according to any changeableness; and hence the Son of God, because He is Eternal Life, is also Himself understood with the Father, where it is said, Who only has immortality. For we, too, are made partakers of this eternal life, and become, in our own measure, immortal. But the eternal life itself, of which we are made partakers, is one thing; we ourselves, who, by partaking of it, shall live eternally, are another. For if He had said, Whom in His own time the Father will show, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords; who only has immortality; not even so would it be necessarily understood that the Son is excluded. For neither has the Son separated the Father from Himself, because He Himself, speaking elsewhere with the voice of wisdom (for He Himself is the Wisdom of God), says, I alone compassed the circuit of heaven. And therefore so much the more is it not necessary that the words, Who has immortality, should be understood of the Father alone, omitting the Son; when they are said thus: That you keep this commandment without spot, unrebukeable, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ: whom in His own time He will show, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords; who only has immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man has seen, nor can see: to whom be honor and power everlasting. Amen. In which words neither is the Father specially named, nor the Son, nor the Holy Spirit; but the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords; that is, the One and only and true God, the Trinity itself.

11. But perhaps what follows may interfere with this meaning; because it is said, Whom no man has seen, nor can see: although this may also be taken as belonging to Christ according to His divinity, which the Jews did not see, who yet saw and crucified Him in the flesh; whereas His divinity can in no way be seen by human sight, but is seen with that sight with which they who see are no longer men, but beyond men. Rightly, therefore, is God Himself, the Trinity, understood to be the blessed and only Potentate, who shows the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ in His own time. For the words, Who only has immortality, are said in the same way as it is said, Who only does wondrous things. And I should be glad to know of whom they take these words to be said. If only of the Father, how then is that true which the Son Himself says, For whatever things the Father does, these also does the Son likewise? Is there any, among wonderful works, more wonderful than to raise up and quicken the dead? Yet the same Son says, As the Father raises up the dead, and quickens them, even so the Son quickens whom He will. How, then, does the Father alone do wondrous things, when these words allow us to understand neither the Father only, nor the Son only, but assuredly the one only true God, that is, the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit?

12. Also, when the same apostle says, But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by Him, who can doubt that he speaks of all things which are created; as does John, when he says, All things were made by Him? I ask, therefore, of whom he speaks in another place: For of Him, and through Him, and in Him, are all things: to whom be glory forever. Amen. For if of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, so as to assign each clause severally to each person: of Him, that is to say, of the Father; through Him, that is to say, through the Son; in Him, that is to say, in the Holy Spirit — it is manifest that the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit is one God, inasmuch as the words continue in the singular number, To whom be glory forever. For at the beginning of the passage he does not say, O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of the Father, or of the Son, or of the Holy Spirit, but of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments, and His ways past finding out! For who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been His counsellor? Or who has first given to Him and it shall be recompensed unto him again? For of Him, and through Him, and in Him, are all things: to whom be glory forever. Amen. But if they will have this to be understood only of the Father, then in what way are all things by the Father, as is said here; and all things by the Son, as where it is said to the Corinthians, And one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and as in the Gospel of John, All things were made by Him? For if some things were made by the Father, and some by the Son, then all things were not made by the Father, nor all things by the Son; but if all things were made by the Father, and all things by the Son, then the same things were made by the Father and by the Son. The Son, therefore, is equal with the Father, and the working of the Father and the Son is indivisible. Because if the Father made even the Son, whom certainly the Son Himself did not make, then all things were not made by the Son; but all things were made by the Son: therefore He Himself was not made, that with the Father He might make all things that were made. And the apostle has not refrained from using the very word itself, but has said most expressly, Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God; using here the name of God specially of the Father; as elsewhere, But the head of Christ is God.

13. Similar evidence has been collected also concerning the Holy Spirit, of which those who have discussed the subject before ourselves have most fully availed themselves, that He too is God, and not a creature. But if not a creature, then not only God (for men likewise are called gods ), but also very God; and therefore absolutely equal with the Father and the Son, and in the unity of the Trinity consubstantial and co-eternal. But that the Holy Spirit is not a creature is made quite plain by that passage above all others, where we are commanded not to serve the creature, but the Creator; not in the sense in which we are commanded to serve one another by love, which is in Greek δουλεύειν, but in that in which God alone is served, which is in Greek λατρεύειν . From whence they are called idolaters who tender that service to images which is due to God. For it is this service concerning which it is said, You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only shall you serve. For this is found also more distinctly in the Greek Scriptures, which have λατρεύσεις . Now if we are forbidden to serve the creature with such a service, seeing that it is written, You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only shall you serve (and hence, too, the apostle repudiates those who worship and serve the creature more than the Creator), then assuredly the Holy Spirit is not a creature, to whom such a service is paid by all the saints; as says the apostle, For we are the circumcision, which serve the Spirit of God, which is in the Greek λατρεύοντες . For even most Latin copies also have it thus, We who serve the Spirit of God; but all Greek ones, or almost all, have it so. Although in some Latin copies we find, not We worship the Spirit of God, but, We worship God in the Spirit. But let those who err in this case, and refuse to give up to the more weighty authority, tell us whether they find this text also varied in the mss.: Do you not know that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost, which is in you, which you have of God? Yet what can be more senseless or more profane, than that any one should dare to say that the members of Christ are the temple of one who, in their opinion, is a creature inferior to Christ? For the apostle says in another place, Your bodies are members of Christ. But if the members of Christ are also the temple of the Holy Spirit, then the Holy Spirit is not a creature; because we must needs owe to Him, of whom our body is the temple, that service wherewith God only is to be served, which in Greek is called λατρεία . And accordingly the apostle says, Therefore glorify God in your body.

Excerpted from New Advent On the Trinity

Jesus Overcame the Things Which Limit Us

The thesis of this post is that Jesus conquered the parts of the human experience which cause so many of us to fail or stumble. What exactly did Jesus overcome? A few things will immediately occur to most of us when we consider this question. Nevertheless, I'm also afraid that most of us have entertained a much too narrow view of the scope of what Christ overcame during his time on this earth. In short, Jesus overcame the things which hinder and limit us in our existence as humans on this planet called earth.

Consider this list of the parts of our experience as humans which Christ overcame:

1. He overcame the system which man has created on this planet. Jesus told his disciples: "I have said these things to you, that in me you may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation. But take heart; I have overcome the world." (John 16:33)

2. Jesus overcame the temptations to focus his energy and attention on the satisfaction/gratification of his own physical needs, to test God's faithfulness and word, and to betray his obligations to God in exchange for a prominent place in this world (Matthew 4:1-11).

3. Jesus also overcame the god of this world, Satan the Devil (Matthew 4:1-11 and Hebrews 2:14).

4. Jesus overcame our human tendency to succumb to depression (Isaiah 53:3).

5. Christ also overcame the shame which so often originates as a consequence of how we are treated by others (Hebrews 12:2).

6. He overcame the sins which so easily beset and condemn us (II Corinthians 5:21 and I Peter 2:24).

7. He overcame death (Revelation 1:18, Romans 6:9, Hebrews 2:14).

8. Jesus overcame the grave which receives and holds most of us when we die (Revelation 1:18, 20:13-14).

9. He will finally overcome the forces of humankind and completely frustrate their attempt to defeat him (Revelation 17:14) - a future tangible and final defeat of the human system which has dominated this earth since our appearance on its surface.

Moreover, the fact that Jesus overcame all of these things which cause us to stumble and fall is underscored by something Christ said to his disciples in the book of Revelation:

"The one who conquers, I will grant him to sit with me on my throne, as I also conquered and sat down with my Father on his throne." (Revelation 3:21)  

The Eucharist in the Gospel of John

In the Gospel of John, after the miracle of the five loaves and two fishes, we read:

On the next day the crowd that remained on the other side of the sea saw that there had been only one boat there, and that Jesus had not entered the boat with his disciples, but that his disciples had gone away alone. Other boats from Tiberias came near the place where they had eaten the bread after the Lord had given thanks. So when the crowd saw that Jesus was not there, nor his disciples, they themselves got into the boats and went to Capernaum, seeking Jesus.

When they found him on the other side of the sea, they said to him, “Rabbi, when did you come here?” Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you are seeking me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves. Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give to you. For on him God the Father has set his seal.” Then they said to him, “What must we do, to be doing the works of God?” Jesus answered them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in him whom he has sent.” So they said to him, “Then what sign do you do, that we may see and believe you? What work do you perform? Our fathers ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written, ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat.’” Jesus then said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is he who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.” They said to him, “Sir, give us this bread always.”

Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me shall not hunger, and whoever believes in me shall never thirst. But I said to you that you have seen me and yet do not believe. All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out. For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will but the will of him who sent me. And this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up on the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who looks on the Son and believes in him should have eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.”

 So the Jews grumbled about him, because he said, “I am the bread that came down from heaven.” They said, “Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How does he now say, ‘I have come down from heaven’?” Jesus answered them, “Do not grumble among yourselves. No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him. And I will raise him up on the last day. It is written in the Prophets, ‘And they will all be taught by God.’ Everyone who has heard and learned from the Father comes to me— not that anyone has seen the Father except he who is from God; he has seen the Father. Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever believes has eternal life. I am the bread of life. Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. This is the bread that comes down from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. And the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.”

The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever feeds on me, he also will live because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like the bread the fathers ate, and died. Whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.” Jesus said these things in the synagogue, as he taught at Capernaum.

--John 6:22-59, ESV

Thus, we see that the symbolism of the Eucharist also appears in the Gospel of John, just as it does in the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke).

Beyond All That We Have Imagined!

This blog has been devoted to the God who cannot be contained. Now, this is a concept that is impossible for us to wrap our minds around. We are bound by time and space. We think in terms of shapes, features, personalities, places, respiration, thinking, learning, etc. Hence, when we try to imagine a being who has no boundaries or limitations, our minds fail us.

God exists outside of everything that limits us! God has no beginning or end. God simply exists, eternally! God isn't confined to one place or time. God has no shape, gender, eyes, ears, hair, hands, legs, genitalia, etc. God doesn't need to breathe or drink water to sustain "his" life. God doesn't need to eat, rest, or sleep. God's mind and thinking doesn't depend on a physical brain and is NOT limited by the information it receives through five senses! God doesn't have to do things a certain way - God can ignite a Big Bang and cause life to evolve.

Moreover, God's reality and perspective is NOT limited or influenced by the personal circumstances and perspectives which necessarily limit us. His mindpower, strength, and energy is unlimited. Scripture informs us that God is also the personification of love. Which, of course, means that "his" patience, mercy, kindness, compassion, forgiveness is without limits. Indeed, God's morality is built on the principle of love. There is no room for vindictiveness, humiliation, or violence of any kind. This is the God who cannot be contained in our minds or anywhere else! 

Moving Forward with God's Grace

I am so proud of my younger brother, Steven. He has endured so much heartache and sorrow over the course of the last twenty-five years and has continued to embrace God and move forward. My readers may recall that my sister-in-law passed away this past December after a long and courageous battle with cancer. Steven took good care of her, honored her wishes, and did the right thing by her son and parents.

The contents of his house and life with Whendy has now been divided up, and the house which they shared has been sold. Steven has found a new home for himself and is planning a new life based on faith, his family, their dog, and a whole lot of fishing. May God bless his new home. May it always be a refuge for him and a comfort when he is tired. May God bless whatever time he has left on this earth with health, peace, and happiness! 

Taking Responsibility for My Own Choices

In the course of this blog's existence, I have been sharply critical of the leadership and theology of the Armstrong Churches of God. Now, I still believe that all of those criticism were valid and deserved. Nevertheless, in the discussions that have been generated here and on other blogs in which I have participated, the question of my own culpability in my entrapment in this cult has arisen a number of times.

First, I want to say that I embrace that as a valid question, and one that a person of real integrity is bound to consider and to offer some response. Having accepted the question, I want to acknowledge immediately that I do accept a large share of the responsibility for my involvement in Armstrongism. If that surprises any of my fellow survivors, it might warrant a little introspection on your own part!

The PLAIN TRUTH is that I was intellectually lazy and did NOT do my due diligence! In short, taking a so-called college level Bible Correspondence Course, reading the Bible and a bundle of booklets and articles on various doctrinal issues did NOT constitute a comprehensive, objective, or critical review of the information available to me. I allowed someone to feed me a pre-packaged, highly subjective interpretation of the Bible. Looking back, it is clear that I accepted the inferior research of others simply because it sounded superficially plausible in explaining a very complicated reality. In other words, while I was definitely interested and looking for answers, I was not willing to do the deep dive necessary to arrive at an informed conclusion.

Sure, it is easier for folks now than it was back in the day. We didn't have the internet at our fingertips, and it is a tremendous resource in the right hands for ferreting out truth. Even so, I cannot escape that realization in the back of my mind that tells me I should have known better. I also have to admit to myself that it did feel good to think that I was privy to inside information that wasn't available to everyone. The allure of being in on the big secret exerted a powerful influence on my ego/vanity!

Over time, I also allowed those master manipulators to place me in a mental straitjacket. I stopped thinking for myself. I stopped asking questions, researching, and seeking answers to the big questions. I allowed myself to be convinced that such curiosity would lead me to the Dark Side of the Force - that I would make myself vulnerable to losing the "truth" and salvation which I thought that I had found! Looking back, it is clear that I also ignored a great deal of evidence over the years which contradicted the interpretations that I had accepted so enthusiastically!

Yes, there were plenty of occasions for me to reject Armstrongism over the years, but I continued to dismiss or ignore the warning signs that things were amiss. I knew that racism was wrong, and I majored in the history of the United States and Britain in college. The evidence was right in front of me that Anglo-Israelism was completely absurd - that what I had already learned had completely and thoroughly discredited the heresy. Looking back now, I have to say that my excuses for taking as long as I did to emerge from the delusion of Armstrongism look pretty weak and pathetic in hindsight!

The point of this post? NEVER allow yourself to be satisfied. Continue to look, explore, question, research, and learn. Also, listen to your own conscience and invite the Holy Spirit to help you in your search for answers and understanding. Do NOT go and dig in the earth and bury the "treasure" which you believe has been entrusted to you. Jesus Christ, your Savior and mine, made it very clear that he expected his disciples to increase/multiply what he had entrusted to them!

The Feast Days and the Trinity

The Feast Days

In the latest edition of The International News, Solomon Bleary writes: “The feast days and weekly Sabbath stand or fall together. In Leviticus 23:1, God uses the possessive pronoun “MY appointed festivals, the festivals of the LORD” to show ownership. Leviticus 23 addresses God’s seven annual holy days and the Sabbath.”

In response, I would note that God “owns” the entire Torah, and that ALL of the commandments contained therein are “His!” Indeed, they are repeatedly characterized as “my commandments,” “my statutes,” and “my laws” throughout those first five books of the Hebrew Bible (See Genesis 26:5, Exodus 16:28, 20:6, Leviticus 22:31, 26:3, 15, Numbers 15:40, Deuteronomy 5:10, 29, 11:13). I would also agree with Solomon that ALL of these obligations (feast days, weekly Sabbath, sacrifices, offerings, etc.) “stand or fall together.”

Like Herbert Armstrong before him, Solomon failed to mention that everything outlined in Torah represented the terms of God’s covenant with ISRAEL! For instance, the twenty-third chapter of the book of Leviticus opens with this statement: “The Lord spoke to Moses, saying, ‘Speak to the people of Israel and say to them, These are the appointed feasts of the Lord that you shall proclaim as holy convocations; they are my appointed feasts.’” (Leviticus 23:1-2, ESV) Likewise, after enumerating all of the Lord’s holy times, we read: “Thus Moses declared to the people of Israel the appointed feasts of the Lord.” (Leviticus 23:44, ESV)

Moreover, God made clear to the people of Israel that ALL of the commandments and instructions included therein were parts of an inseparable whole. In the fourth chapter of Deuteronomy, we read: “And now, O Israel, listen to the statutes and the rules that I am teaching you, and do them, that you may live, and go in and take possession of the land that the Lord, the God of your fathers, is giving you. You shall not add to the word that I command you, nor take from it, that you may keep the commandments of the Lord your God that I command you.” (Deuteronomy 4:1-2, ESV) And, a little later in the same chapter: “This is the law that Moses set before the people of Israel. These are the testimonies, the statutes, and the rules, which Moses spoke to the people of Israel when they came out of Egypt.” (Deuteronomy 4:44-45, ESV) In this sense, the entire legislation of Torah “stands or falls together.”

Likewise, the Greek New Testament makes clear that Jesus Christ and his apostles viewed Torah (AKA “The Law”) as a comprehensive, inseparable whole. According to the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus said: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.” (Matthew 5:17, ESV) Here, Christ divided the Hebrew Scriptures into Law and Prophets and said that he came here to FULFILL THEM (ALL of them). Later, in this same account, we read that Christ was asked about the greatest commandments of the Law. He replied: “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the Law and the Prophets.” (Matthew 22:37-40, ESV) In similar fashion, Paul wrote to the Christians at Rome: “Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.” (Romans 13:10, ESV) James wrote: “For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it.” (James 2:10 ESV)

In other words, Jesus Christ fulfilled ALL of the Law and ALL of the Prophets. It all pointed to HIM! That is why Paul wrote to the saints at Colossae: “So don’t let anyone condemn you for what you eat or drink, or for not celebrating certain holy days or new moon ceremonies or Sabbaths. For these rules are only shadows of the reality yet to come. And Christ himself is that reality.” (Colossians 2:16-17, NLT)

How do they all point to Christ? Jesus was our Passover Lamb who was sacrificed for us. He is also the Unleavened Bread of Life, without the leavening of sin. He is our Wave Sheaf Offering! He is the firstfruits of God’s plan to redeem humankind from sin and death, and who made it possible for us to receive the indwelling of the Holy Spirit! Jesus is both the epitome of God’s reign over the earth and its inhabitants and the impetus for the proclamation of that Good News. He is the one who carries away our sins and reconciles us to God – achieving our at-one-ment. Finally, Jesus is the one who took on our nature and tabernacled in the flesh for a little while, and the one who invited “Anyone who is thirsty may come to me! Anyone who believes in me may come and drink!” (John 7:37-38, NLT)

In fact, the New Testament informs us that the ENTIRE Hebrew Bible MUST be interpreted and understood through the Christ event! In the Gospel of Luke, we read: “’When I was with you before, I told you that everything written about me in the law of Moses and the prophets and in the Psalms must be fulfilled.’ Then he opened their minds to understand the Scriptures.” (Luke 24:44-45, NLT) Hence, we are forced to ask ourselves: What happens to the symbol when the reality comes to pass?

In his article, Solomon went on to point out that “Some argue that the feast days (Leviticus 23) are a part of the sacrificial system of the Levites.” My reaction: Have you actually read this chapter of Leviticus? Do you realize that sacrifices and offerings are woven into the text describing ALL of these appointed times which the Israelites were instructed to observe. Yes, as Solomon points out, there were also sacrifices associated with the weekly Sabbath. That’s because it was ALL part of a system – components of a whole!

So, how are these things manifested in the New Covenant? Jesus is the true Sabbath rest who said: “Come to me, all of you who are weary and carry heavy burdens, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you. Let me teach you, because I am humble and gentle at heart, and you will find rest for your souls.” (Matthew 11:28-29, NLT) Likewise, in terms of circumcision (another sign of God’s covenant with Israel), Paul wrote to the Christians at Rome: “For you are not a true Jew just because you were born of Jewish parents or because you have gone through the ceremony of circumcision. No, a true Jew is one whose heart is right with God. And true circumcision is not merely obeying the letter of the law; rather, it is a change of heart produced by the Spirit. And a person with a changed heart seeks praise from God, not from people.” (Romans 2:28-29, NLT)

What Solomon and his associates fail to see is that Jesus of Nazareth FULFILLED ALL of the requirements of Torah for us. He didn’t do away with them. He made them obsolete by being  what they pointed to! Moreover, like the saints of Galatia, many of the people of CGI continue to believe that salvation is something which they must earn! Solomon wrote: “If we are not commandment-keeping people, how will we be saved and be a part of the first resurrection?” The answer to his question, of course, is that we will be saved because Christ obeyed those commandments without flaw and then offered himself as a sacrifice for us – to pay the penalty for all of the occasions we failed to obey!

As Paul wrote to the saints at Galatia almost two thousand years ago: “But those who depend on the law to make them right with God are under his curse, for the Scriptures say, ‘Cursed is everyone who does not observe and obey all the commands that are written in God’s Book of the Law.’ So, it is clear that no one can be made right with God by trying to keep the law. For the Scriptures say, ‘It is through faith that a righteous person has life.’ This way of faith is very different from the way of law, which says, ‘It is through obeying the law that a person has life.’” (Galatians 3:10-12, NLT) Even so, there is a sense in which Solomon’s assertion that Christ is going to return to a commandment keeping people is true.

Quite intentionally, Christ drew Two Great Commandments from the Torah and identified them as fulfilling the Law (Love for God and each other). Indeed, Christ commanded his disciples to love each other, and that them doing so would identify them as his disciples (John 15:9-13).

Paul wrote: “We know that our old sinful selves were crucified with Christ so that sin might lose its power in our lives. We are no longer slaves to sin. For when we died with Christ, we were set free from the power of sin. And since we died with Christ, we know we will also live with him. We are sure of this because Christ was raised from the dead, and he will never die again. Death no longer has any power over him. When he died, he died once to break the power of sin. But now that he lives, he lives for the glory of God. So, you also should consider yourselves to be dead to the power of sin and alive to God through Christ Jesus. Do not let sin control the way you live; do not give in to sinful desires. Do not let any part of your body become an instrument of evil to serve sin. Instead, give yourselves completely to God, for you were dead, but now you have new life. So, use your whole body as an instrument to do what is right for the glory of God. Sin is no longer your master, for you no longer live under the requirements of the law. Instead, you live under the freedom of God’s grace.” (Romans 6:6-14, NLT) Hence, Christ will be returning to people who have been transformed and are living their lives in obedience to Christ’s commandments about love.

Christ’s people do NOT need a list of dos and don’ts like the one given to the people of Israel. The people of the New Covenant do NOT need to present sacrifices and offerings, keep the festivals at Jerusalem, be physically circumcised, attend synagogue on Sabbath, avoid eating unclean animals, consult the Urim and Thummim, observe mildew regulations, or write bills of divorce when they become dissatisfied with their spouses! If Christ’s followers are truly loving each other, a specific commandment against murder, adultery, stealing, or coveting becomes redundant and unnecessary. Hence, the answer to the question that Solomon posed (Should the Feast Days Be Kept?) is NO! One last thing, it is currently impossible to observe the festivals in the manner prescribed by Torah anyway!

The Trinity

In the commentary thread for my last post (Should the Feast Days Be Kept?), the issue of the Trinity was raised and offered as evidence that Christians should be observing the Feasts and Sabbaths of Torah. “WHAT?” some of you will ask. It was asserted that Jesus of Nazareth was the God of the Old Testament – that Christ was the one who gave the Law to Moses. Hence, for them, the Law of Moses = the Law of Christ. And, of course, everyone knows that Jesus is the same yesterday, today, and forever! Now, admittedly, in the realm of human reasoning there is a superficial kind of logic to this assertion. However, as usual, if we dig a little deeper, the logic falls apart (because it relies on the Armstrongist binitarianism). In other words, a heresy built on the foundation of yet another heresy!

In response to one of the comments, I wrote: “The fourteenth chapter of John is critical to understanding this phenomenon. We read there: "6 Jesus said to him, 'I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. 7 If you had known me, you would have known my Father also. From now on you do know him and have seen him.' 8 Philip said to him, 'Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us.' 9 Jesus said to him, 'Have I been with you so long, and you still do not know me, Philip? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? 10 Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own authority, but the Father who dwells in me does his works. 11 Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me, or else believe on account of the works themselves.'" (John 14:6-11) Jesus had already told them that he and the Father were ONE (John 10:30).

Likewise, Christ alluded to another part of the Godhead in that same chapter (14) of the Gospel of John. He said: "15 If you love me, you will keep my commandments. 16 And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Helper, to be with you forever, 17 even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him. You know him, for he dwells with you and will be in you. 18 I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you. 19 Yet a little while and the world will see me no more, but you will see me. Because I live, you also will live. 20 In that day you will know that I am in my Father, and you in me, and I in you. 21 Whoever has my commandments and keeps them, he it is who loves me. And he who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and manifest myself to him.' 22 Judas (not Iscariot) said to him, 'Lord, how is it that you will manifest yourself to us, and not to the world?' 23 Jesus answered him, 'If anyone loves me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him. 24 Whoever does not love me does not keep my words. And the word that you hear is not mine but the Father's who sent me." (John 14:15-24) Did you get that? Jesus promised that all three parts (Father, Son, Helper/Holy Spirit) would make their home with true Christians - God with and in us!”

In response, the commentator who relied on binitarianism quoted the following passages:

1 Jn 2:1 But if anyone does sin, we have an advocate [parakleton] before the Father—Jesus Christ, the Righteous One. (BSB).

Jn 14:16) And I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Advocate [parakleton] to be with you forever— (BSB).

Rom 8:9 if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.

Rom 8:10 And if Christ be in you

Gal 4:4) God sent forth [exapostello] his Son

Gal 4:6 And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth [exapostello] the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.

Now, the commentator obviously believed that these passages supported his/her binitarianism; but if we take a closer look, we see Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in these passages, and they appear as ONE and a part of each other.

Likewise, the same commentator cited a number of other passages that he/she believed would support his/her binitarianism. As one example, the commentator quoted John 1:1 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” He/she then asked: “Why isn’t <it> ‘and the Word was with God and the HS’?” He/she, however, fails to acknowledge that later (in this same chapter) we read: “32 Then John testified, “I saw the Holy Spirit descending like a dove from heaven and resting upon him. 33 I didn’t know he was the one, but when God sent me to baptize with water, he told me, ‘The one on whom you see the Spirit descend and rest is the one who will baptize with the Holy Spirit.’ 34 I saw this happen to Jesus, so I testify that he is the Chosen One of God.” (John 1:32-34)

In similar fashion, the commentator quoted: “1Jn 1:3b and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ.” Then asked: “Why isn’t our fellowship with the Father, Jesus Christ and the HS?” As is usually the case with proof texting, the commentator completely ignored what followed. In the second chapter of this same epistle, we read: “20 But you are not like that, for the Holy One has given you his Spirit, and all of you know the truth. 21 So I am writing to you not because you don’t know the truth but because you know the difference between truth and lies. 22 And who is a liar? Anyone who says that Jesus is not the Christ. Anyone who denies the Father and the Son is an antichrist. 23 Anyone who denies the Son doesn’t have the Father, either. But anyone who acknowledges the Son has the Father also. 24 So you must remain faithful to what you have been taught from the beginning. If you do, you will remain in fellowship with the Son and with the Father. 25 And in this fellowship we enjoy the eternal life he promised us. 26 I am writing these things to warn you about those who want to lead you astray. 27 But you have received the Holy Spirit, and he lives within you, so you don’t need anyone to teach you what is true. For the Spirit teaches you everything you need to know, and what he teaches is true—it is not a lie. So just as he has taught you, remain in fellowship with Christ.” (I John 2:20-27) I don’t know about you, but that sure sounds to me like John believed that the Holy Spirit was essential to maintaining our fellowship with the Father and the Son!

The commentator then went on to list “Well-wishes with two divine sources.” In this instance, the commentator pointed to the greetings in several epistles (mostly Paul’s):

Rom 1:7b Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ

1 Cor 1:3 Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ

2 Cor 1:2 Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ

Gal 1:3 Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ

Eph 1:2 Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ

Phil 1:2 Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ

2 Thess 1:2 Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ

1 Tim 1:2b Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ

2 Tim 1:2b Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ

Titus 1:4b Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ

Philemon 3 Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ

2 Pet 1:2 May grace and peace be multiplied to you in the knowledge of God and Jesus our Lord

2 John 3 Grace, mercy and peace will be with us from God the Father and from Jesus Christ the Father’s Son, in truth and love

--David E. Aune, Revelation 1-5, WBC, p.27.

Then, he/she went on to quote from Bullinger’s commentary on Revelation: “Nowhere do we find the Holy Spirit associated with the Father and the Son in any salutation. Not even in the Pauline Epistles”

REALLY? Please notice the rest of Paul’s salutation in his epistle to the Romans:

Romans 1: 1 This letter is from Paul, a slave of Christ Jesus, chosen by God to be an apostle and sent out to preach his Good News. 2 God promised this Good News long ago through his prophets in the holy Scriptures. 3 The Good News is about his Son. In his earthly life he was born into King David’s family line, 4 and he was shown to be the Son of God when he was raised from the dead by the power of the Holy Spirit. He is Jesus Christ our Lord. 5 Through Christ, God has given us the privilege and authority as apostles to tell Gentiles everywhere what God has done for them, so that they will believe and obey him, bringing glory to his name. 6 And you are included among those Gentiles who have been called to belong to Jesus Christ. 7 I am writing to all of you in Rome who are loved by God and are called to be his own holy people.” (Romans 1:1-7a)

Likewise, in his first epistle to the saints at Corinth, we read: “6 Yet when I am among mature believers, I do speak with words of wisdom, but not the kind of wisdom that belongs to this world or to the rulers of this world, who are soon forgotten. 7 No, the wisdom we speak of is the mystery of God—his plan that was previously hidden, even though he made it for our ultimate glory before the world began. 8 But the rulers of this world have not understood it; if they had, they would not have crucified our glorious Lord. 9 That is what the Scriptures mean when they say, ‘No eye has seen, no ear has heard,  and no mind has imagined what God has prepared for those who love him.’ 10 But it was to us that God revealed these things by his Spirit. For his Spirit searches out everything and shows us God’s deep secrets. 11 No one can know a person’s thoughts except that person’s own spirit, and no one can know God’s thoughts except God’s own Spirit. 12 And we have received God’s Spirit (not the world’s spirit), so we can know the wonderful things God has freely given us.” (I Corinthians 2:6-12)

The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit may not be mentioned in all of the salutations; but this trio is woven into the very fabric of the New Testament (and the Hebrew Scriptures). Indeed, some of the very passages which Armstrongists use to disprove the Trinity actually demonstrate the unity of the Godhead! In the first chapter of Genesis, we read that “the Spirit of God was hovering over the surface of the waters.” While in the New Testament, we read that God created all things by Jesus Christ (Ephesians 3:9). So, who did the creating? Was it God, the Word, or the Holy Spirit? The answer is YES! In the Gospel of Matthew, we read that Mary “became pregnant through the power of the Holy Spirit.” Moreover, the angel told Joseph that “the child within her was conceived by the Holy Spirit.” (Matthew 1:18-20) Was the Holy Spirit involved or was the Father involved? Once again, the answer is YES! No, sorry folks, the Trinity isn’t demonstrated in a few proof texts – it is in almost every page of the Greek New Testament!

**Although these posts were written for Banned by HWA, after reviewing the commentary threads on that blog, I think that they should also appear here.

 

Saint David's Day

Yesterday (March 1) marked the day that the people of Wales celebrated their patron saint. He was born in the Sixth Century in the vicinity of St. Bride's Bay, Pembrokeshire, Wales. He is known to have actively sought to refute and stamp out the Pelagian heresy. He also served as the Bishop of Mynyw, and several miracles have been attributed to him. It was said that he raised a dead child back to life and healed a blind man. On another occasion, while addressing a crowd, a hill was said to have formed underneath his feet and elevated him enough so that the people could hear him speak. The people of Wales associate the Daffodil with him and often wear them on his day.

Britanica's Article on Saint David

At any rate, as a person of Welsh ancestry, I am pleased to acknowledge this early pioneer of the Christian faith in the British Isles. Interestingly, my Welsh ancestors were devout Quakers who settled in Pennsylvania in the late 17th Century and early 18th Century. Indeed, the records of that sect's monthly meetings were a valuable resource in tracking this part of my ancestry. I had the opportunity to travel to Wales many years ago and was struck by the rugged beauty of the countryside. May God continue to bless the ekklesia in Wales and may the seeds that David planted so long ago continue to spread like the mustard seed in Christ's parable!  

The Things That You DON'T Have to Believe to Be a Christian

Many denominations and individual Christians have formulated elaborate professions of faith and/or official statements outlining their beliefs. Naturally, these folks believe that these professions/statements are an important, or even essential, part of their religion. Nevertheless, many of us understand that TRUE Christianity is NOT defined by what you know or think you know! Sure, as we have described here in previous posts, there are some essentials or foundational elements that a Christian MUST believe (like believing and accepting that the life and sacrifice of Jesus of Nazareth has paid the penalty for his/her sins and reconciled us to God); but there is a whole lot of stuff floating around out there that is simply NOT critical or necessary for us to accept/believe!

Here are a few:

1. You do NOT have to accept the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy. You do NOT have to believe that the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures are flawless and without errors, mistakes, inaccuracies, or contradictions. You do NOT have to believe that it is the only or most perfect representation of God's will and character that is available to us - or that it is the "final authority" in matters related to our Christian faith. You also do NOT have to reject the inspiration of Scripture or its value to the believer just because you reject the teachings of Fundamentalist Christians about Scripture! In other words, rejecting biblical inerrancy does NOT necessarily make Scripture irrelevant! The all or nothing notion is a clearly FALSE DILEMMA in terms of logic.

2. You do NOT have to reject the theory of evolution or believe that the earth is only 6,000 years old. You do NOT have to believe that the fossil and geological records have been misinterpreted by scientists, or that the evolution of life forms on this planet is an absurd or illogical explanation for the diversity of the life we see around us. In short, you do NOT have to believe that science or scientists are the enemy of our faith, or that the conclusions they've reached based on the available evidence necessarily contradict the notion of God as Creator of the universe. In other words, the choice between faith and science is yet another FALSE DILEMMA!

3. You do NOT have to accept ANY denomination's or individual's profession of faith or statement of belief to be a Christian! The acceptance of such professions/statements may identify you as a Catholic, Lutheran, Anglican, Baptist, Methodist, or Armstrongite; BUT it has NO bearing on whether or not you're a Christian, a disciple of Jesus Christ, a member of the assembly called out and together by God! Indeed, I haven't found very many people in my experience who embrace all of the practices and beliefs of the various manmade organizations they may be affiliated with in terms of their Christian faith. Once again, all or nothing is always a FALSE DILEMMA! If you have God's Holy Spirit and something doesn't make sense to YOU, then you would be FOOLISH to embrace it as truth!

4. You do NOT have to adopt a partisan political affiliation to be a Christian. Indeed, I'm personally very skeptical of the status of folks who do that. In other words, you do NOT have to be anti-abortion or against LGBTQ folks or immigrants to be a Christian! Likewise, you do NOT have to be a Capitalist, Socialist, Libertarian, Conservative, Liberal, Globalist, Isolationist, Vegetarian, or Carnivore to be a Christian. As we have already mentioned in the previous points, identifying manmade ideologies or policies as good or evil, Christian or Satanic is the epitome of binary thinking - the good old FALSE DILEMMA!

What do you think?

The Modern Beast and Babylon

Herbert Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God offered a booklet in the early 1970s titled The Modern Romans. Unfortunately, although Armstrong flirted with the truth in that booklet, he still ultimately missed the boat (as he and his followers have done with most things of a prophetic nature. In the books of Daniel and Revelation, the Roman Empire became the epitome of human governance during the period of the Second Temple and beyond. Rome was the type of Babylon, the city that ruled over the other kings of that part of the earth! The Romans were militant, wealthy, exploitative, inventive, and ruthless. They erected great works, demanded the loyalty and worship of their subjects, and were obsessed with entertaining themselves and the masses.

Let's notice some of the language in the book of Revelation. We read there: "they worshiped the beast, saying, 'Who is like the beast, and who can fight against it?'" (Revelation 13:4) Rome and its army were considered the preeminent military power in the Mediterranean and European world of that time. Continuing, we read that the beast: "opened its mouth to utter blasphemies against God, blaspheming his name and his dwelling, that is, those who dwell in heaven. Also, it was allowed to make war on the saints and to conquer them. And authority was given it over every tribe and people and language and nation, and all who dwell on earth will worship it, everyone whose name has not been written before the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who was slain." (Revelation 13:6-8) Rome and its Emperor made themselves gods and declared that the state and emperor were worthy of worship. Over time, the Roman Senate became a rubber stamp for the emperors - eventually, willingly ceding all of their power to him. They persecuted Jews and Christians and ridiculed their beliefs and practices.

Likewise, a little later in the same book, we read: "'Come, I will show you the judgment of the great prostitute who is seated on many waters, with whom the kings of the earth have committed sexual immorality, and with the wine of whose sexual immorality the dwellers on earth have become drunk.' And he carried me away in the Spirit into a wilderness, and I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was full of blasphemous names, and it had seven heads and ten horns. The woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and jewels and pearls, holding in her hand a golden cup full of abominations and the impurities of her sexual immorality. And on her forehead was written a name of mystery: 'Babylon the great, mother of prostitutes and of earth's abominations.' And I saw the woman, drunk with the blood of the saints, the blood of the martyrs of Jesus." (Revelation 17:1-6) Rome ruled the lands around the Mediterranean and set up client states and allies in many different lands. Indeed, the Roman economic, political, and military system was duplicated in numerous other nations around the world of that time. Coliseums, amphitheaters, baths, aqueducts, and highways were constructed everywhere that Rome ruled. Wealth and excess were the foundation of that society. Continuing, we read: "The waters that you saw, where the prostitute is seated, are peoples and multitudes and nations and languages...And the woman that you saw is the great city that has dominion over the kings of the earth." (Revelation 17:15-18)

Now, the readers of John's apocalypse in the First and Second Centuries would have readily recognized this symbolism as applying to the Roman Empire. It would have been crystal clear to them! Likewise, being very familiar with their own history and the book of Daniel, they would have appreciated the comparison of the city of Rome to the city of Babylon, and the Roman Emperor to King Nebuchadnezzar of old. Unfortunately, many Christians are NOT looking for these attributes in any of the nations of the Twenty-first Century, and the real import of the message of the book of Revelation regarding God's evaluation of human systems of governance is often missed or overlooked! In short, do we recognize any modern nations which exhibit the same characteristics?

Are there any nations in 2025 who have built vast empires and accumulated great wealth and military power? Are there any instances where we could justly ask: Who is like this great nation? Who would dare to fight against it? Are there any nations extant in our day who have exerted their economic and military power on a global basis? Is there any nation(s) who has imposed its will on other nations and forced them to adopt copies of their own systems? Is there any nation today who has monopolized the wealth and resources of much of the rest of the world? Is there any nation today who has devoted itself to great public works and spectacles? Is there a nation in our time who has constructed great arenas, theaters, and stadiums to entertain its people? Is there any nation in the 21st Century that has copied Roman and Greek architecture - causing people to admire the classical past? Is there any modern nation who has made its ideology into something worthy of adoration and worship? What do you think?

*The English Standard Version is used throughout this post.

The Generosity of the United States?

Jesus of Nazareth laid down a principle of God's judgment that is recorded in the Gospels. He said: "When someone has been given much, much will be required in return; and when someone has been entrusted with much, even more will be required." He also said: "It is more blessed to give than to receive." Likewise, in the Gospel of Matthew, we read that he once told a rich young person: "If you want to be perfect, go and sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor."

In a thread for the Banned by HWA post The Incredible Human Paradox, I wrote: "As with Babylon of old, the United States has conquered, exploited, murdered, enslaved, and oppressed." In response, Ronco wrote: "No country has done more than the US to aid people in third world countries." This is one of the standard responses of "patriots" when anyone dares to point out any fault in the United States. The reasoning goes like this: "as long as the good is greater than the evil" we must evaluate the entity as "good."

Well, let's take a closer look at Ronco's claim about the generosity of the United States. By any object standard, the United States is one of the wealthiest nations on the face of the earth (see The World's 25 Richest Countries by GDP and The Ten Wealthiest Countries in the World). Now, while we could certainly say that the United States gives the largest total dollar amount of any country in foreign aid, that statistic would be virtually meaningless when we compare the wealth of nations in relation to their giving. According to the World Economic Forum, these countries are the most generous in terms of their giving based on percentage of gross national income given: Sweden (1.41%), UAE (1.09%), Norway (1.05%), Luxembourg (.93%), Denmark (.85%), Netherlands (.76 %), United Kingdom (.71%). Hint, the United States did NOT make the list! In their article Why the U.S. Ranks at the Bottom in a Foreign Aid Index, NPR reported that: "According to an annual index released Tuesday by the Center for Global Development that ranks 27 of the world's wealthiest countries, the U.S. scored dead last on foreign aid contributions and quality — despite being the largest donor in dollar amount. That's because in 2017, it allocated a mere 0.18 percent of its gross national income for development assistance. That is well short of the 0.7 percent that wealthy countries have committed to strive for since 1970."

Imagine that - the wealthiest nation on the face of the earth gives the smallest percentage of its income to the poorest of the world! How can anyone point to this statistic with pride? By any objective standard, the United States is one of the least generous nations on the face of the earth! In the Gospel of Mark, we read: Jesus sat down near the collection box in the Temple and watched as the crowds dropped in their money. Many rich people put in large amounts. Then a poor widow came and dropped in two small coins. Jesus called his disciples to him and said, “I tell you the truth, this poor widow has given more than all the others who are making contributions. For they gave a tiny part of their surplus, but she, poor as she is, has given everything she had to live on." (Mark 12:41-44, NLT) 

The Evil Foundations of the United States of America

Unfortunately, a growing number of Fundamentalist Christians have sought to portray the United States as a "Christian" nation. To support their false narrative, they have asserted that the United States was founded on Judeo-Christian principles, and that its Founding Fathers were Divinely inspired men of an exceptionally righteous character. In short, they have ignored and/or attempted to whitewash a great deal of the dark reality of U.S. history. The TRUTH is that the United States was founded on discontent, exploitation, oppression, rebellion, ruthlessness, hypocrisy, greed, and unrelenting violence! In short, there isn't enough lipstick in the world to make this pig pretty!

The story of the United States begins with the European Colonization of the Americas. From the "discovery" of the very old "New World" by Colombus to the establishment of plantations or colonies by the British, there hasn't been very much righteousness or truth in the narrative of what actually happened during those years. Indeed, the story opens with such a sense of European superiority and arrogance toward the indigenous peoples of this continent that it makes the racism of the Twenty-First Century look mild by comparison! To be clear, those natives were looked upon as savages, barely worthy of being considered human. Their civilizations were regarded as barbaric, and their use of the land they occupied was looked upon as uncivilized, wasteful, and lazy. In fact, Europeans had such a low opinion of the aboriginal peoples that they regarded their claims to the lands they occupied as having been invalidated.

These attitudes toward the indigenous population of the Americas manifested themselves in a number of ways over the years which followed. Europeans took lands and established settlements without permission. They also launched wars of conquest on the natives and imposed treaties on them based on European laws and values which they did not understand. Moreover, as those natives had no natural immunity to European diseases, the Europeans unintentionally and intentionally introduced lethal epidemics among them which suddenly wiped-out large numbers of the original inhabitants of the land. In fact, according to History.com, "By the close of the Indian Wars in the late 19th century, fewer than 238,000 Indigenous people remained of the estimated 5 million-plus living in North America before European contact." That same source goes on to inform us that the clash of interests between natives and Europeans led "the U.S. government to authorize over 1,500 wars, attacks and raids on Indians, the most of any country in the world against its Indigenous people." By the 1830's, President Andrew Jackson had set in motion the removal of 60,000 indigenous people from the Southeast by the United States Army (many of whom would die along the way in what is now known as the "Trail of Tears."

Likewise, we know that the first African slaves were introduced into what would become the United States in 1619. In their article on "The Middle Passage," Britannica informs us that thousands of Africans were involuntarily loaded aboard ships for the 5,000-mile voyage across the Atlantic Ocean to be sold as slaves in the New World. The same article goes on to inform us that, because of the intolerable heat, crowding and unsanitary conditions within the holds of the ships: "Historians estimate that between 15 and 25 percent of the enslaved Africans bound for the Americas died aboard slave ships." The souls who survived were subjected to forced labor, substandard food/clothing/housing, beatings, and forced separation from family members. Politifact.com informs us that "Thirty-four of the 47 men depicted in the famous 'Declaration of Independence' painting were slaveholders." By the way, that number included such names as John Hancock, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson! Indeed, history informs us that twelve U.S. Presidents owned slaves (including Washington, Jefferson, and Madison). Moreover, we know that the United States eventually fought a great Civil War over the institution of slavery, and that that war remains the deadliest war in terms of casualties in U.S. history.

As for our notions of republican and democratic governance, we borrowed heavily from the pagan Greeks and Romans. We sometimes forget that Rome had a Senate long before the United States did. Also, within the false history of the Fundamentalist Christians we spoke about at the beginning of this post, the claim is made that all of our Founding Fathers were Christians. Now, in the broadest possible sense, we could say that such statements were true, but the devil is truly in the details. Indeed, the kind of Christianity practiced by men like Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin would be disavowed by the same folks who make these claims. It would be more accurate to state that they were Deists with Christian dispositions. For instance, did you know that Thomas Jefferson wrote his own version of the Gospels which eliminated the miracles and claims of Christ's Divinity? Did you also know that Benjamin Franklin described himself as a Deist and expressed his doubts about Christ's Divine status? Moreover, it is clear that many of the things which these men believed and practiced were inconsistent with Christ's commandment to love your neighbor as yourself. We could justly claim that there were some elements of "servant leadership" incorporated into the Constitution of the United States, but we would be hard pressed to find widespread evidence of it in the actual experience of our government.

Finally, we must admit that the United States was founded in rebellion against Great Britain. Indeed, the Revolutionary War is a well-documented fact of our history. In fact, that war served as the basis for the original extant/borders of our nation. Later, Thomas Jefferson purchased what was then known as the Louisiana Territory from the French tyrant, Napoleon Bonaparte. Likewise, many of us seem to forget that we fought a war with Mexico that resulted in the United States annexing the entire northern half of that nation's territory! We also fought a war with Spain and acquired many of their interests and territories around the world as a consequence of it. We too sometimes forget that the United States became a world power because of our commerce and devotion to building a strong Army and Navy. Moreover, in the course of that pursuit, we have developed and used weapons of mass destruction unprecedented in the history of humankind on this planet! Hence, we can see that any attempt to characterize our nation's beginnings as benign, righteous, just, or "Christian" is very problematic and contradicts much of the historical evidence available to us.

The PLAIN TRUTH is that the United States of America is yet another in a long list of efforts by humans to govern themselves. Like the other nations of the earth, one faction seeks to impose its will and vision on others; and together they attempt to secure their interests and will at the expense of the other nations of the earth. In short, nostalgia for the good old days and patriotic propaganda may make us feel warm and fuzzy; but then again, most fairy tales do just that! As Christians, we would all be better served by a clear-eyed assessment of who and what we are compared to God's standard.

The Moral and Intellectual Credentials of America's Defenders of Family Values

In the United States, the Republican Party is perceived to be politically conservative and the defenders of faith, family values, marriage, masculinity, and patriotism. Some of the most vociferous mavens of traditional "Christian" values in the United States have been affiliated with talk radio and the current and former political commentators of Fox News. And, make no mistake, many Evangelical Christians eat up the stuff these folks dish out like it was caviar! BUT is the influence these demagogues exercise warranted? What exactly are their credentials to defend the ideology they espouse?

Let's begin with the President they all adore and defend with such vigor. Donald Trump is a notorious womanizer and adulterer. He has been married three times and has fathered children by all three. He does NOT attend any Church on a regular basis and has used the Bible as a prop for the furtherance of his own political career. He lies and twists the truth without blinking an eye - insisting that the end justifies the means. He is arrogant, vindictive, and unkind and has displayed none of the other fruits of the Holy Spirit in either his personal or professional life. However, he did receive a Bachelor of Science in Economics from Wharton. Hence, unlike most of his defenders, he does at least have a college degree. There is no record of military service.

Rush Limbaugh was the preeminent voice of conservative talk radio for many years. He was a nominal Methodist throughout his life. He was divorced three times, and his fourth wife outlived him. He had no children. He was addicted to prescription drugs for a time. To his credit, Rush did graduate from high school and tried college for two semesters at Southeast Missouri State University. Rush was a gifted and flamboyant radio personality, but he was not known for his intellectual prowess. Even so, he did amass a fortune in the course of his career on radio. There is no record of military service.

Rush Limbaugh - Wikipedia

Rush Limbaugh - Death, Career & Facts

Sean Hannity began life as a Roman Catholic but abandoned that faith when he was young. He professes to believe in God, the multi-verse, and that God is the Creator of all of mankind. He is noted for his less than generous appraisals of homosexuals and liberals. He has stated that "there is an intersection between politics and a belief or a faith in God. And, you know, the United States of America has been the light to the world." Hannity has also affirmed that he is at his best when he takes 30 minutes out of his day to devote to "God time." He was married to the mother of his children for many years before separating from her and eventually divorcing her several years later. He is currently in a relationship with Ainsley Earhardt (who is 14/15 years his junior), a fellow commentator on Fox. He attended New York and Adelphi Universities, but did not receive a degree from either one. There is no record of military service.

Sean Hannity | Biography & Facts | Britannica

Sean Hannity Opens Up About His Religious Journey and Christian Faith

Sean Hannity - Wikipedia

Speaking of Ainsley, she has been married and divorced two times; and she has been in a relationship with colleague Sean Hannity since her last divorce in 2019. Nevertheless, Earhardt is a professing Christian and does have a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism from the University of South Carolina.

Ainsley Earhardt - Wikipedia

In one of his many books, Bill O'Reilly wrote: "My religion is Roman Catholicism. I go to church, but I'm an independent thinker." He is divorced and was accused by his former wife of domestic violence. O'Reilly has been the subject of many lawsuits by women claiming that he sexually harassed them, resulting in many millions of dollars being paid to settle those cases. Bill, however, does hold degrees from Marist, Boston, and Harvard. There is no record of military service.

What religion is Bill O'Reilly? - Beliefnet

Bill O'Reilly (political commentator) - Wikipedia

Jesse Watters, a protege of Bill O'Reilly, divorced the mother of his first two children in 2019 and immediately announced his engagement to the woman who had caused his divorce (to be clear, he had an affair with her while he was still married to his first wife). He and his second wife also have two children together. He does, nevertheless, have a Bachelor of Arts degree from Trinity College. There is no record of military service.

Jesse Watters - Wikipedia

Glenn Beck started out life as a Roman Catholic, but he drifted into alcoholism and drug addiction. Later, he joined the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormon) and has even dabbled in Anglo-Israelism. He divorced his first wife in 1994 and married his current wife in 1999. Although Beck didn't attend college, he did graduate from high school. In fairness, he is noted for his generous philanthropy, and his affinity for unreliable sources and conspiracy theories. There is no record of military service.

Glenn Beck - Wikipedia

The Not-so Mormon Soteriology of Glenn Beck – Mormonism Research Ministry

Tucker Carlson is the product of a broken marriage and was abandoned by his mother as a child. He claims to be an Episcopalian, but he has been very critical of that faith (see my post on that subject). He is still married to his wife and has a Bachelor of Arts in History from Trinity. He lost his job at Fox for exposing that network to significant liability for misleading reporting surrounding the January 6th Insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. There is no record of military service.

Tucker Carlson - Wikipedia

Mark Levin is an accomplished lawyer who received his law degree from Temple University. He has only been married two times. He was raised in the Jewish faith. There is no record of military service.

Mark Levin biography, net worth, wife, divorce, marriage, wedding • biography 

Hmmmmm, I'm not sure the collective moral and intellectual credentials of this bunch is very impressive. What do you think?

They preach, but do not practice. They tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on people's shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to move them with their finger.