Featured Post

Pledges, Oaths, and Service to the Nations of This World?

In the Hebrew Torah, pledges and oaths, along with the service which flows from them, are regarded as sacred responsibilities to God and/or ...

Sunday, October 20, 2024

The Purpose of Life

Dennis Diehl just posted an article titled The Danger in "The God Given Purpose" on the Banned by HWA blog, and I highly recommend that everyone read it. Unfortunately, I know all too well that there will be a few narrow-minded readers who will automatically dismiss whatever Dennis has to say because he is an atheist (I've experienced the same phenomenon because of my homosexuality). Oh well, it is as they say, "they don't know what they are missing!" Scripture tells us that it is dangerous to be without counsel, and that wisdom is to be found in a multitude of counselors - suggesting a variety of perspectives and opinions (Proverbs 11:14). In other words, you don't have to embrace everything that I, Dennis, or anyone else has to say on some subject, but you might find something useful in formulating your own perspective on the topic.

Dennis began his post with some quotes from another counselor:

"Isn't it fantastic that if there is no purpose you have nothing to fulfill. You can just live. But no. You want a purpose and not just a simple purpose, but a God given purpose. It's very dangerous. People who think they have a God given purpose are doing the cruelest things on the planet. They are doing the most horrible things. And they have always been doing the most horrible things. Because when you are given a God given purpose, life here becomes less important than your purpose."

Dennis then proceeded to summarize his own spiritual journey - beginning in the Dutch Reformed Church, followed by his experiences in Herbert Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God and ending in the rejection of all manmade religion. He then concluded by agreeing with those quotations that he began with, and "The purpose in life is to live."

Now, interestingly, those who profess to be disciples of Jesus of Nazareth would come up with all kinds of answers to the question: "What is the purpose of life?" For many more traditional Christians, the answers might involve anything from the Great Commission, being kind and compassionate to others, or getting to heaven someday. For most Armstrongites, the answer would be becoming a priest-king in God's Kingdom and/or becoming God! For me, the Scriptural and obviously natural answer is much closer to the answer provided by the guru and Dennis!

If we look at the natural world around us, we see that ALL of the life on this planet is preoccupied with the perpetuation of itself. Both instinct and cognition impel us to avoid hurt and death. Even the process of evolution is defined by the adaptation of life to whatever environment it inhabits! Moreover, every species of life on this planet has the ability to reproduce - to perpetuate itself. Plants produce seeds, and animals produce offspring. What's more, EVERY system (respiratory, circulatory, digestive, etc.) within this organism we call "human" is designed to sustain its life! Hence, we see that the most profound and reasonable answer to our question about the purpose of life is the perpetuation of ourselves! Too simple and mundane for you? Let's look at some Scripture on this subject.

In the first chapter of Genesis, it is revealed that God created life and gave it the ability to reproduce. And, notice the very first instructions which God gave to the first humans: "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth!" (Genesis 1:28, ESV) In the very next chapter, it is revealed that one of the trees which God placed in the Garden of Eden was referred to as the Tree of Life (Genesis 2:9). Interestingly, we are told that the humans had access to this tree (Genesis 2:16). Indeed, the only one that they were forbidden to eat of its fruit was the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil (Genesis 2:17) - the one that would lead to DEATH! Then, at the end of the third chapter, we read: "Then the Lord God said, 'Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil. Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever—' therefore the Lord God sent him out from the garden of Eden to work the ground from which he was taken. He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life." (Genesis 3:22-24, ESV)

What follows, in both the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures, is the story about how God gets mankind back to LIFE! In Torah, we read that God told the Israelites: "See, I have set before you today life and good, death and evil. If you obey the commandments of the Lord your God that I command you today, by loving the Lord your God, by walking in his ways, and by keeping his commandments and his statutes and his rules, then you shall live and multiply, and the Lord your God will bless you in the land that you are entering to take possession of it." (Deuteronomy 30:15-16, ESV) Continuing, the thought concluded with: "I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore, choose life, that you and your offspring may live." (Deuteronomy 30:19, ESV) Clearly, God's purpose was the perpetuation of LIFE!

In the Greek New Testament, we read: "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life." (John 3:16, ESV) A little later, in the same Gospel, we read that Jesus said: "I came that they may have life and have it abundantly. (John 10:10, ESV) Likewise, Paul wrote to the saints at Rome (a favorite of Armstrongites): "For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." (Romans 6:23, ESV) He also wrote to the saints at Corinth on this wise: "The first man Adam became a living being”; the last Adam became a life-giving spirit. But it is not the spiritual that is first but the natural, and then the spiritual." (I Corinthians 15:45-46, ESV) He went on to explain: "For this perishable body must put on the imperishable, and this mortal body must put on immortality. When the perishable puts on the imperishable, and the mortal puts on immortality, then shall come to pass the saying that is written: 'Death is swallowed up in victory. O death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting?'" (I Corinthians 15:53-55, ESV) Finally, the author of the epistle to the Hebrews wrote: "Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same things, that through death he might destroy the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil, and deliver all those who through fear of death were subject to lifelong slavery." (Hebrews 2:14-15, ESV)

Now, it is inevitable that someone will ask: "Who wants to live forever?" (The Queen song from Highlander is playing in my mind as I write - great song) But isn't that really a question about the quality of life - NOT its purpose? In other words, would your answer to that question be different if you didn't have to worry about your health, losing loved ones, war, pollution, over-crowding, starvation, crime, etc.? In the book of Revelation, we read about a new heaven and earth where God "will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away." (Revelation 21:1-4, ESV) Afraid of getting bored? What if you were always preoccupied with the perpetuation of life?

Nevertheless, Dennis makes a valid and an astute point about folks wasting this life in pursuit of their purpose - another point which gets us back to the issue of quality of life. I think that this is best answered by something written long ago that was attributed to the wise King Solomon: "I perceived that there is nothing better for them than to be joyful and to do good as long as they live; also, that everyone should eat and drink and take pleasure in all his toil—this is God's gift to man." (Ecclesiastes 3:12-13, ESV) In other words, we should be enjoying what we do in this life! As for purpose, he had this to say: "For everything there is a season, and a time for every matter under heaven:

a time to be born, and a time to die;

a time to plant, and a time to pluck up what is planted;

a time to kill, and a time to heal;

a time to break down, and a time to build up;

a time to weep, and a time to laugh;

a time to mourn, and a time to dance;

a time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together;

a time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing;

a time to seek, and a time to lose;

a time to keep, and a time to cast away;

a time to tear, and a time to sew;

a time to keep silence, and a time to speak;

a time to love, and a time to hate;

a time for war, and a time for peace. (Ecclesiastes 3:1-8, ESV) 

Finally, while Jesus certainly instructed his disciples to make the Kingdom of God a priority in their lives, he also said: "Therefore do not be anxious about tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble." (Matthew 6:34, ESV)

"The purpose in life is to live." I think that's just about right!

Thursday, October 17, 2024

The Parable of the Talents

 The Parable of the Talents

14 “For it will be like a man going on a journey, who called his servants and entrusted to them his property. 15 To one he gave five talents, to another two, to another one, to each according to his ability. Then he went away. 16 He who had received the five talents went at once and traded with them, and he made five talents more. 17 So also he who had the two talents made two talents more. 18 But he who had received the one talent went and dug in the ground and hid his master's money. 19 Now after a long time the master of those servants came and settled accounts with them. 20 And he who had received the five talents came forward, bringing five talents more, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me five talents; here, I have made five talents more.’ 21 His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 22 And he also who had the two talents came forward, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me two talents; here, I have made two talents more.’ 23 His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 24 He also who had received the one talent came forward, saying, ‘Master, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you scattered no seed, 25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here, you have what is yours.’ 26 But his master answered him, ‘You wicked and slothful servant! You knew that I reap where I have not sown and gather where I scattered no seed? 27 Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and at my coming I should have received what was my own with interest. 28 So take the talent from him and give it to him who has the ten talents. 29 For to everyone who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance. But from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. 30 And cast the worthless servant into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’

--Matthew 25:14-30, ESV

Will You Be Ruling Over Ten Cities?

In my last post, I discussed how Herbert Armstrong confused human notions about governance and the exercise of authority with God's conception of those things. Indeed, we demonstrated that his failure to comprehend the profound differences between the two models led him to twist the meaning of the Kingdom of God! To be more precise, we made it very clear that Armstrong's emphasis on GOVERNMENT and RULERSHIP was misguided, and it twisted his understanding of what the Gospel of the Kingdom of God was all about. In this post, we will demonstrate that it also twisted his understanding of one of Christ's parables about the Kingdom (It actually twisted Armstrong's understanding of many parables, but we don't have the space or time to go through all of them here).

In the nineteenth chapter of Luke, we read:

11 The crowd was listening to everything Jesus said. And because he was nearing Jerusalem, he told them a story to correct the impression that the Kingdom of God would begin right away. 12 He said, “A nobleman was called away to a distant empire to be crowned king and then return. 13 Before he left, he called together ten of his servants and divided among them ten pounds of silver, saying, ‘Invest this for me while I am gone.’ 14 But his people hated him and sent a delegation after him to say, ‘We do not want him to be our king.’

15 “After he was crowned king, he returned and called in the servants to whom he had given the money. He wanted to find out what their profits were. 16 The first servant reported, ‘Master, I invested your money and made ten times the original amount!’

17 ‘Well done!’ the king exclaimed. ‘You are a good servant. You have been faithful with the little I entrusted to you, so you will be governor of ten cities as your reward.’

18 “The next servant reported, ‘Master, I invested your money and made five times the original amount.’

19 ‘Well done!’ the king said. ‘You will be governor over five cities.’

20 “But the third servant brought back only the original amount of money and said, ‘Master, I hid your money and kept it safe. 21 I was afraid because you are a hard man to deal with, taking what isn’t yours and harvesting crops you didn’t plant.’

22 ‘You wicked servant!’ the king roared. ‘Your own words condemn you. If you knew that I’m a hard man who takes what isn’t mine and harvests crops I didn’t plant, 23 why didn’t you deposit my money in the bank? At least I could have gotten some interest on it.’

24 “Then, turning to the others standing nearby, the king ordered, ‘Take the money from this servant, and give it to the one who has ten pounds.’

25 ‘But, master,’ they said, ‘he already has ten pounds!’

26 ‘Yes,’ the king replied, ‘and to those who use well what they are given, even more will be given. But from those who do nothing, even what little they have will be taken away. 27 And as for these enemies of mine who didn’t want me to be their king—bring them in and execute them right here in front of me.’”

In his explanation of this parable, Herbert Armstrong wrote: "Now notice in verse 17, the one who had gained ten pounds is given authority to RULE CITIES - 'have thou authority over ten cities'! To the one who had gained five pounds, he said, 'Be thou also over five cities.' This is speaking of the SECOND COMING OF CHRIST and of His delegating authority to rule to saints converted during this Christian era, between Christ's first and second appearings (sic) on earth. This parable, then, was spoken to make clear to us that the Kingdom of God is a literal GOVERNMENT, to be set up AT CHRIST'S SECOND COMING - and not before!" - Just What Do You Mean - Kingdom of God? Armstrong also observed on another occasion "Some resurrected saints will rule over ten cities, some over five (Luke 19: 17 -19)." - Tomorrow - What It Will Be Like

Unfortunately, Mr. Armstrong always had trouble interpreting symbolism because of his obsession with literalism. He seems to have forgotten what a parable is! In their article, What is a Parable? Christianity.com provides this definition of a parable: "A parable is a simple story used to illustrate a moral or spiritual lesson, as told by Jesus in the Gospels. The word "parable" comes from the Greek word 'parabolē,' which means 'comparison' or 'illustration.' Parables typically employ everyday situations and characters, making them accessible to a wide audience." In the writings of Herbert Armstrong referenced in the preceding paragraph, he seemed to understand that the nobleman represented Christ, but he quickly abandons any notion of symbolic meaning and declares that this passage means that resurrect saints will be ruling over literal cities in God's Kingdom! In other words, he is making the parable conform to his understanding that the Kingdom of God is all about "GOVERNMENT."

Now, let's return to the parable itself and reread it without Mr. Armstrong's obvious bias. According to Luke, why did Jesus give this parable? Didn't he tell them this story "to correct the impression that the Kingdom of God would begin right away?" Isn't it obvious that Christ's disciples had the same obsession with a literal, human-like kingdom that Herbert Armstrong developed? Didn't Christ's disciples think in terms of Christ overthrowing Roman rule and restoring the Davidic Kingdom? In this connection, please review Acts 1:6-8. Do you think that the parable is about actual money being distributed to Christ's disciples? Is it possible that the story is pointing to the gifts of the Holy Spirit being distributed to them? Is it possible that the story is suggesting that those servants should be about the business of growing in grace and knowledge - developing the fruits of that Spirit which were entrusted to them? Is it possible that the story is suggesting that those individuals who have grown the most in love, kindness, and mercy will be the greatest in the Kingdom? Indeed, wouldn't such an interpretation be more consistent with our understanding of the definition of a parable? What do you think?

One more thing. All of this brings another passage of Scripture to mind. In the thirteenth chapter of Matthew, we read:

10 His disciples came and asked him, 'Why do you use parables when you talk to the people?'

11 He replied, 'You are permitted to understand the secrets of the Kingdom of Heaven, but others are not. 12 To those who listen to my teaching, more understanding will be given, and they will have an abundance of knowledge. But for those who are not listening, even what little understanding they have will be taken away from them. 13 That is why I use these parables, For they look, but they don’t really see. They hear, but they don’t really listen or understand.'" (Matthew 13:10-13, NLT)

Is it just me, or does that suggest anything to you about Herbert Armstrong's status as a disciple of Jesus Christ?

 

Tuesday, October 15, 2024

The Kingdom of God: A Different Kind of Authority

In his booklet Just What Do You Mean - Kingdom of God? Herbert Armstrong wrote about a prophecy delivered to the King of Babylon in the book of Daniel:

"Notice! This is speaking of KINGDOMS. It is referring to kingdoms that bear rule over the people on earth. It is speaking of GOVERNMENTS! It is not speaking of ethereal sentiments 'set up in the hearts of men.' It is not speaking of churches. It is speaking of the kind of GOVERNMENTS that bear RULE and AUTHORITY over nations of PEOPLE here on earth. It is literal. It is specific. There is no misunderstanding, here, as to what is meant by the word: KINGDOM.'"

Mr. Armstrong then proceeded to explain that the prophecy outlined "a succession of world-ruling governments." After the final government, Mr. Armstrong believed the God would set up his own government. He wrote:

"This is THE KINGDOM OF GOD. It is the END of present governments - the governments that rule Russia, China, Japan, Italy, Germany - yes, and even the United States and the British nations. They then shall become the kingdoms - the GOVERNMENTS of the Lord JESUS CHRIST, then KING of kings over the entire earth. This makes completely PLAIN the fact that the KINGDOM OF GOD is a literal GOVERNMENT. Even as the Chaldean Empire was a KINGDOM - even as the Roman Empire was a KINGDOM - so the KINGDOM OF GOD is a government. It is to take over the GOVERNMENT of the NATIONS of the world.

Jesus Christ was BORN to be a KING - a RULER!" - Just What Do You Mean - Kingdom of God?

This is where Armstrong and Jehovah's Witnesses made a critical mistake in their understanding of the Gospel. They wrongly assumed that God intended to replace all of the human kingdoms/governments of the world with his own version of THEIR kingdoms/governments. In Armstrong's interpretation, God would replace the AUTHORITY of humans by assuming the authority to rule himself! In other words, for Armstrong and his followers, the important difference was that man would be replaced at the top of the AUTHORITY pyramid by God! What they failed to understand was the fact that God's notion of authority and government was fundamentally DIFFERENT from man's conception of them!

In short, the Kingdom of God is about so much more than replacing a bunch of bad rulers with a good one! When the Jews handed Jesus over to Pilate, the Roman governor asked him if he was a king. Christ responded: "My Kingdom is not an earthly kingdom. If it were, my followers would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jewish leaders. But my Kingdom is not of this world." (John 18:36, NLT) This was apparently hard for this human ruler to understand. The Governor asked, "So, you are a king?" (John 18:37) Continuing, we read: "Jesus responded, “You say I am a king. Actually, I was born and came into the world to testify to the truth. All who love the truth recognize that what I say is true." (John 18:37, NLT) And, considering my audience, we need to make very plain that the truth which Christ was referencing was NOT the little package of doctrines which Armstrong identified as "THE TRUTH."

No, THE TRUTH which Christ spoke about concerned the real nature of HIS KINGDOM, the one which he spoke about in his parables! The one which eschewed the lust for material wealth, power, and conquest. THE KINGDOM which focuses on THE LAW of love, forgiveness, reconciliation, mercy, peace, healing, and service to others. THE KINGDOM which focuses on training the world to follow God's way by setting a good example for others to follow, NOT the human way of standing in front of a classroom and lecturing students. THE KINGDOM which has a completely different conception of AUTHORITY and its uses, NOT the human way of imposing one's will and agenda on others. THE KINGDOM which seeks the glorification of others, NOT the glorification of the ruler. THE KINGDOM without borders and without any lust for the territory or resources of others. THE KINGDOM which is focused on what's in the hearts of its subjects, NOT in the duties which they owe to the state!

What Herbert Armstrong failed to understand is that the books of Daniel and Revelation are focused on the CONTRAST between human notions about authority and governance and Divine notions of those things! Whether human governance was manifested by Egypt, Babylon, Persia, Greece, or Rome, there was a certain formula which all of them are portrayed as following. Indeed, they are all characterized by authoritarianism, selfishness, cruelty, demanding worship of the state, and militant belligerence. Moreover, they are all portrayed as being motivated by the lust for more territory, wealth, and power. For all of these human governments, their subjects were regarded as owing their complete allegiance to the state and its objectives, while the state really didn't owe them anything! The subjects were there to serve the state and its interests. In short, the exact OPPOSITE of the Divine model!

When two of Christ's disciples expressed their desire to be given the highest positions of authority in his kingdom, Jesus replied: "You know that the rulers in this world lord it over their people, and officials flaunt their authority over those under them. But among you it will be different. Whoever wants to be a leader among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first among you must become your slave. For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve others and to give his life as a ransom for many." (Matthew 20:25-28, NLT) Now, this model of "servant leadership" was obviously very foreign to even his disciples' notions about leadership. Indeed, it is apparent that they thought that they would be lording it over people in Christ's kingdom! Nevertheless, Jesus made it clear here and in many other passages that he was a different kind of king.

In the New Testament, the Greek word "basileia" is translated into English as "kingdom." In the Blue Letter Bible entry for this word (click on the Greek word), the term is defined as: royal power, kingship, dominion, rule: 1. not to be confused with an actual kingdom but rather the right or authority to rule over a kingdom, 2. of the royal power of Jesus as the triumphant Messiah, 3. of the royal power and dignity conferred on Christians in the Messiah's kingdom." In light of this definition, it is interesting to note that the Greek word "exousia" appears over and over again in the New Testament canon. Once again, Blue Letter Bible informs us that this word is translated into English as "power, authority, right." As in Christ's statement that "All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth," or as the NLT renders it "I have been given all authority in heaven and on earth." (Matthew 28:18) Likewise, we know that Jesus taught in a manner that suggested he had the "authority" to do so (Matthew 7:29, Mark 1:22). We are also informed that Christ gave his disciples the power/authority to heal and to cast out demons (Mark 3:15). We are also told that Christ had the authority/power to execute judgment and to give eternal life (John 5:27 and 17:2). Perhaps, most importantly, Christ had the power/authority to lay down his life and take it up again (John 10:18).

In short, we can see that our human notions about governance and authority are the ANTITHESIS of God's Kingdom! In other words, it isn't a matter of replacing one dictator with another - albeit a superior and more benevolent one! NO, the Kingdom of God represents an entirely different way of exercising power/authority. It is also NOT based on the aggrandizement of a person or the state. Instead, the Kingdom of God is concerned with the welfare and salvation of its subjects - of serving the people under its authority/power.  

  

Saturday, October 12, 2024

Donald Trump Is NOT in the Bible (and anyone who says so is a false prophet)!

Within both Evangelical Christian Circles and the Armstrong Churches of God, there are several folks who are saying that God is using Donald Trump to save America. Indeed, some of them say that Donald Trump's presidency was prophesied in Scripture! The pastor of the Beth Israel Worship Center, Jonathan Cahn, says that Trump is the modern equivalent of King Jehu of Israel. The pastor general of the Philadelphia Church of God claims that Trump is the modern equivalent of King Jeroboam II. Moreover, these absurd notions are even boosted by more mainstream voices like Franklin Grahm! Unfortunately, a large number of Americans now believe that Trump has been ordained by God to save America.

It is astonishing to me that a post such as this would even be necessary. In a sane world that wasn't in the grips of a partisan fever, such notions would be quickly dismissed as incredible. Even more surreal is the fact that so many Christians have so willingly swallowed this unholy alliance between secular politics and the religion which they profess to follow. It's as if God and Ceasar have become one in the eyes of many of these people! They readily twist both Scripture and history to support their notion of America as God's own - a righteous Christian nation that has been corrupted by perverts, immigrants, abortionists, globalists, and Marxists. Indeed, they have traveled so far down the rabbit hole that they are almost completely divorced from reality - rejecting any evidence which contradicts their worldview!

Nevertheless, I would be remiss not to point out the fact that the folks who hold up Donald Trump as the savior of Christian values in America are utterly WRONG! Indeed, I believe that it is blasphemous to use God and Scripture to support such foolishness. Yes, the Hebrew Bible records several instances where God used secular Gentile leaders to punish or help "His" people, Israel. However, God NEVER used any of those leaders to restore or administer the observance of Torah - NEVER! No, there are a number of instances where God used secular Gentile leaders to invade, conquer, deport, defend, and return the Israelites; but I challenge anyone to cite a single example of God using one of them to enforce or protect "His" moral code for the people of Israel (hint - Cyrus is included in this challenge).

Also, I would be remiss not to point out that the United States of America is NOT Israel! The United States is NOT the Promised Land! The government of the United States is NOT of Divine origin - it is NOT God's Kingdom. Likewise, Capitalism is NOT God's monetary system! Moreover, throughout its history as a nation, the United States of America has NEVER been a righteous nation - NEVER! European settlers stole land from Native Americans, murdered and abused them, and broke nearly every promise which they ever made to them! They also enslaved their African brethren, mistreated them, murdered them, and discriminated against them! They ruthlessly exploited the natural resources of North America and much of the rest of the world. American history is also full of corruption, assassination, and immorality of all kinds! Plain and simple, there NEVER was a golden age of righteousness in America's past.

Finally, ALL of the prophets of the Hebrew Scriptures (Moses, Nathan, Elijah, Elisha, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Amos, Zechariah, etc.) were given messages FOR THE PEOPLE OF ISRAEL! Moreover, Jesus Christ said that HE was the fulfillment of Torah, the prophets, and the Psalms! Indeed, when those Scriptures were originally written, the United States of America wasn't even a glimmer in anyone's mind! Finally, Jehu usurped the throne of Israel, murdered the former royal family (and a king of Judah), and was evaluated as someone who "was not careful to walk in the law of the Lord, the God of Israel, with all his heart. He did not turn from the sins of Jeroboam, which he made Israel to sin." (II Kings 10:31) As for Jeroboam II, we read that "he did what was evil in the sight of the Lord. He did not depart from all the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, which he made Israel to sin." (II Kings 14:24) Indeed, the prophet Amos predicted a violent end for Jeroboam and the subjugation of his people (Amos 7). In other words, these were NOT good kings (they did NOT restore or enforce God's morality).

Hence, we have seen that placing Donald Trump in the role of God's anointed is absurd! It is a delusion, pure and simple! We are all free to vote the dictates of our own conscience, but please don't try to justify yourself as supporting God's anointed candidate - that's just plain old hogwash!  


Friday, October 11, 2024

Have You Ever Read Christ's Feast of Tabernacles Messages?

Every year, the Armstrong Churches of God designate various festival sites for their members to gather and observe the Feast of Tabernacles outlined in the Law of Moses. During their celebrations, there will be a large number of sermons delivered about the Kingdom of God coming to this earth. Indeed, for most of them, this festival celebrates the Millennial rule of Christ and his saints - a time of peace, happiness, and abundance. But is this really what this festival pictures? Is this what the festival symbolizes? OR Was this meaning imposed on the festival to fit Herbert Armstrong's interpretation of God's plan?

In previous posts, I have written about the fact that Torah's instructions for this festival had the Israelites construct temporary shelters around the Tabernacle or Temple to celebrate this festival. In some of those posts, I have also pointed out that Jesus Christ came to this earth to temporarily tabernacle in the flesh. Moreover, we should also note that Scripture alludes to the fact that humans currently inhabit a temporary dwelling, which we must someday leave behind for a more permanent home. Now, obviously, these things fit very well with the notion of a "Festival of Temporary Dwellings."

Even so, the Gospel of John records that Jesus observed this festival once upon a time in Jerusalem, and that he delivered two messages during his celebration of it. Now, I may be out in left field with this, but don't you think we should all be just a little bit interested in what he had to say on that occasion? For instance, did he talk about the Millenium? Did he discuss government? In short, what did Jesus talk about during the festival? Let's take a look!

John 7:16 So Jesus told them, “My message is not my own; it comes from God who sent me. 17 Anyone who wants to do the will of God will know whether my teaching is from God or is merely my own. 18 Those who speak for themselves want glory only for themselves, but a person who seeks to honor the one who sent him speaks truth, not lies. 19 Moses gave you the law, but none of you obeys it! In fact, you are trying to kill me.”

20 The crowd replied, “You’re demon possessed! Who’s trying to kill you?”

21 Jesus replied, “I did one miracle on the Sabbath, and you were amazed. 22 But you work on the Sabbath, too, when you obey Moses’ law of circumcision. (Actually, this tradition of circumcision began with the patriarchs, long before the law of Moses.) 23 For if the correct time for circumcising your son falls on the Sabbath, you go ahead and do it so as not to break the law of Moses. So why should you be angry with me for healing a man on the Sabbath? 24 Look beneath the surface so you can judge correctly.”

Now, that's interesting! He talked about the pitfalls of legalism!

37 On the last day, the climax of the festival, Jesus stood and shouted to the crowds, “Anyone who is thirsty may come to me! 38 Anyone who believes in me may come and drink! For the Scriptures declare, ‘Rivers of living water will flow from his heart.’” 39 (When he said “living water,” he was speaking of the Spirit, who would be given to everyone believing in him. But the Spirit had not yet been given, because Jesus had not yet entered into his glory.)

New Living Translation

This is what Christ chose to talk about during his only recorded observance of this festival. Again, maybe it's just me, but don't you think that this might have some application to the meaning of these days?

Monday, October 7, 2024

Satan Is NOT All That!

Herbert Armstrong portrayed Satan as a powerful and indestructible spirit being who ruled over this earth with his demons and had the ability to deceive and destroy. To support his narrative about Satan he quoted prooftexts from Isaiah, Ezekiel, Ephesians, and Revelation. Likewise, he often described the temptation of Christ as a "titanic" battle between good and evil. In short, for Mr. Armstrong, Satan was a powerful adversary bent on destroying humanity, and that there was very little that we puny humans could do to resist or defeat him.

Fortunately, however, Mr. Armstrong's narrative about Satan was/is NOT consistent with what is revealed in Scripture. Indeed, from the very first mention of this being in Scripture, his subjection to God is underscored, and his defeat is prophesied! The story of the fall of Adam and Eve is well-known to all of us. When God confronted the couple for eating from the tree which he had forbidden them to eat from, we are informed that the woman said that the serpent had deceived her (Genesis 3:13). Next, we read that God told the serpent: "Because you have done this, cursed are you above all livestock and above all beasts of the field; on your belly you shall go, and dust you shall eat all the days of your life. I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel." (Genesis 3:14-15, ESV) Notice, that God has the authority to curse the serpent and to predict that a descendant of the woman would "bruise your head" (indicative of a fatal injury), and that the serpent would only "bruise his heel."

In the next mention of Satan in Scripture, we read: "Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them. The Lord said to Satan, 'From where have you come?' Satan answered the Lord and said, 'From going to and fro on the earth, and from walking up and down on it.' And the Lord said to Satan, 'Have you considered my servant Job, that there is none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, who fears God and turns away from evil?' Then Satan answered the Lord and said, 'Does Job fear God for no reason? Have you not put a hedge around him and his house and all that he has, on every side? You have blessed the work of his hands, and his possessions have increased in the land. But stretch out your hand and touch all that he has, and he will curse you to your face.' And the Lord said to Satan, 'Behold, all that he has is in your hand. Only against him do not stretch out your hand.' So Satan went out from the presence of the Lord." (Job 1:6-12, ESV) Once again, we see that Satan is subject to God - that he presented himself to God along with the rest of the angelic host. Notice too, that he could only do what God ALLOWED him to do, nothing more!

Then, after Satan had removed Job's wealth and caused the death of his children, we read: "Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them to present himself before the Lord. And the Lord said to Satan, 'From where have you come?' Satan answered the Lord and said, 'From going to and fro on the earth, and from walking up and down on it.' And the Lord said to Satan, 'Have you considered my servant Job, that there is none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, who fears God and turns away from evil? He still holds fast his integrity, although you incited me against him to destroy him without reason.' Then Satan answered the Lord and said, 'Skin for skin! All that a man has he will give for his life. But stretch out your hand and touch his bone and his flesh, and he will curse you to your face.' And the Lord said to Satan, 'Behold, he is in your hand; only spare his life.'" (Job 2:1-6, ESV) Yet again, Satan was only allowed to do certain things by God. In other words, God was in control! Indeed, there is a strong sense here that God is using Satan for his own purposes - to effect a positive change in Job's life!

Likewise, in the book of Zechariah, we read: "Then he showed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of the Lord, and Satan standing at his right hand to accuse him. And the Lord said to Satan, 'The Lord rebuke you, O Satan! The Lord who has chosen Jerusalem rebuke you! Is not this a brand plucked from the fire?' Now Joshua was standing before the angel, clothed with filthy garments. And the angel said to those who were standing before him, 'Remove the filthy garments from him.' And to him he said, 'Behold, I have taken your iniquity away from you, and I will clothe you with pure vestments.' And I said, 'Let them put a clean turban on his head.' So they put a clean turban on his head and clothed him with garments. And the angel of the Lord was standing by." (Zechariah 3:1-5, ESV) Once again, Satan is portrayed as the accuser, but the Lord was clearly in charge of the situation. This Jehoshua (Hebrew: YHWH is salvation), acting as High Priest, was clearly a type of the Jehoshua (Jesus) who was to appear later for the saving of humankind, and Satan was REBUKED (his accusation was rejected)!

Now, before leaving the Old Testament, we should also take a closer look at those passages from Isaiah and Ezekiel that Herbert Armstrong liked to cite as prooftexts for his portrayal of Satan. In that passage from Isaiah, the King of Babylon was represented as Satan. We read there: "How the oppressor has ceased, the insolent fury ceased! The Lord has broken the staff of the wicked, the scepter of rulers, that struck the peoples in wrath with unceasing blows, that ruled the nations in anger with unrelenting persecution. The whole earth is at rest and quiet; they break forth into singing. The cypresses rejoice at you, the cedars of Lebanon, saying, ‘Since you were laid low, no woodcutter comes up against us.’ Sheol beneath is stirred up to meet you when you come; it rouses the shades to greet you, all who were leaders of the earth; it raises from their thrones all who were kings of the nations. All of them will answer and say to you: ‘You too have become as weak as we! You have become like us!’ Your pomp is brought down to Sheol, the sound of your harps; maggots are laid as a bed beneath you, and worms are your covers. How you are fallen from heaven, O Day Star, son of Dawn! How you are cut down to the ground, you who laid the nations low! You said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heaven; above the stars of God I will set my throne on high; I will sit on the mount of assembly in the far reaches of the north; I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.’ But you are brought down to Sheol, to the far reaches of the pit." (Isaiah 14:4-15, ESV)

After leaving Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God, the first thing that struck me about this passage was the fact that he had only used part of the passage. There are clear references within this passage to the DEATH of the person/entity being discussed. This, however, did NOT fit with Armstrong's narrative about an indestructible, immortal Satan! His solution to this glaring contradiction? Those parts of the passage only apply to the human king of Babylon! NO, sorry Mr. Armstrong, this passage clearly speaks of the ultimate and utter defeat and END of Satan! Moreover, it makes sense that the God who created this being would be able to destroy him. After all, we read in Scripture that only God has immortality (I Timothy 6:16)! Now, from what is revealed elsewhere in Scripture, it appears that angels have the ability to exist indefinitely. Even so, as created beings, they exist at the pleasure of their Creator!

In similar fashion, that passage from the book of Ezekiel reveals much more than Herbert Armstrong was willing to admit. After talking at some length about the "Prince of Tyre," the narrative changes to a discussion about the "King of Tyre" (Ezekiel 28:1-12). We read there: "You were the signet of perfection, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty. You were in Eden, the garden of God; every precious stone was your covering, sardius, topaz, and diamond, beryl, onyx, and jasper, sapphire, emerald, and carbuncle; and crafted in gold were your settings and your engravings. On the day that you were created they were prepared. You were an anointed guardian cherub. I placed you; you were on the holy mountain of God; in the midst of the stones of fire you walked. You were blameless in your ways from the day you were created, till unrighteousness was found in you. In the abundance of your trade you were filled with violence in your midst, and you sinned; so I cast you as a profane thing from the mountain of God, and I destroyed you, O guardian cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. Your heart was proud because of your beauty; you corrupted your wisdom for the sake of your splendor. I cast you to the ground; I exposed you before kings, to feast their eyes on you. By the multitude of your iniquities, in the unrighteousness of your trade you profaned your sanctuaries; so I brought fire out from your midst; it consumed you, and I turned you to ashes on the earth in the sight of all who saw you. All who know you among the peoples are appalled at you; you have come to a dreadful end and shall be no more forever." (Ezekiel 28:12-19, ESV) Now, that is plain language about Satan's fate! Moreover, as we will shortly demonstrate, it is entirely consistent with what is revealed on that subject in the New Testament!

In the New Testament, the temptation of Jesus Christ by Satan the Devil is mentioned in three of the Gospel narratives (Matthew 4:1-11, Mark 1:12-13, and Luke 4:1-13). Simply put, Jesus successfully rebutted three temptations put forward by Satan, and then commanded him to leave! Interestingly, both Jesus and Satan cited Scripture in their conversation with each other. Of course, Satan was twisting/perverting the text, and Christ was using it to refute Satan! Nevertheless, after reading these narratives, we have the clear sense that Satan gave it his best shot, and Christ didn't even flinch! In other words, Christ clearly defeated Satan.

Moreover, all four of the Gospel narratives portray Christ and his disciples as having complete authority over Satan's demonic kingdom. We find them casting out demons from possessed and afflicted people on numerous occasions in those writings. Indeed, at one point, after having been sent out to preach Christ's message, we read: "The seventy-two returned with joy, saying, 'Lord, even the demons are subject to us in your name!' And he said to them, 'I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven. Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall hurt you. Nevertheless, do not rejoice in this, that the spirits are subject to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven." (Luke 10:17-20, ESV) Clearly, Christ was portrayed here and elsewhere as having full authority over Satan and his demons.

On another occasion, Christ was accused of casting out demons because Satan had granted him that authority (Luke 11:14-15). Christ, however, quickly pointed out just how absurd such a notion was. He said: "Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and a divided household falls. And if Satan also is divided against himself, how will his kingdom stand? For you say that I cast out demons by Beelzebul. And if I cast out demons by Beelzebul, by whom do your sons cast them out? Therefore, they will be your judges. But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you. When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own palace, his goods are safe; but when one stronger than he attacks him and overcomes him, he takes away his armor in which he trusted and divides his spoil." (Luke 11:17-22, ESV) In other words, God and Christ were clearly stronger entities than Satan! Satan and his minions were in subjection to them, NOT the other way around!

On another occasion, after reprimanding the Jews for NOT following the example of obedience to God that Abraham had set for them, Jesus said: "If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and I am here. I came not of my own accord, but he sent me. Why do you not understand what I say? It is because you cannot bear to hear my word. You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies." (John 8:42-44, ESV) He was reminding them that Satan is a liar - that he had lied to their ancestors, Adam and Eve. Satan's only power was to lie and deceive and to cause hurt and harm. Indeed, later, in that same Gospel account, we are told that Satan influenced one of Christ's disciples to betray him (John 13:27, ESV)!

Now, from the other writings that make up the New Testament, it is also clear that Christ's apostles had the same perspective on Satan. We read in the book of Acts that Peter believed that Satan had inspired Ananias and his wife to lie about their contribution to the Church (Acts 5:3). And, just as in the story of Job, it appears that Paul felt that Satan was a tool that could be used to procure a positive spiritual outcome (I Corinthians 5:5). Even so, it is also clear that Paul understood Satan's power to deceive (I Corinthians 7:5, II Corinthians 2:11, 4:4, 11:14, Ephesians 2:2, II Thessalonians 2:9). In his own epistle, Peter warned Christians to "Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour..." (I Peter 5:8, ESV). Even so, he went on to reassure his audience that they would have the ultimate victory through Christ (I Peter 5:9-11).

Now, fortunately for us, someone in the First Century decided to write down some very important things about the Chistian perspective on the Hebrew Bible. For our purposes, the most important things revealed in that book have to do with the Angelic realm, and what Christ accomplished for us relative to Satan the Devil. In the first chapter of that epistle, it is revealed that Christ fulfills a role in God's plans that is vastly superior to the one played by angels. Indeed, their part is summed up nicely in the final verse of the chapter. Speaking about angels, we read: "Are they not all ministering spirits sent out to serve for the sake of those who are to inherit salvation?" (Hebrews 1:14, ESV)

Contrary to Mr. Armstrong's teachings in The Incredible Human Potential and Mystery of the Ages, in the second chapter of this epistle, we read: "For it was not to angels that God subjected the world to come, of which we are speaking." (Hebrews 2:5, ESV) The author goes on to reveal that humankind was tagged by God to inherit that "world to come" (Hebrews 2:6-10, ESV). Then, finally, we come to the critical passage: "Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same things, that through death he might DESTROY the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil, and deliver all those who through fear of death were subject to lifelong slavery." (Hebrews 2:14-15, ESV) Did you catch that? Christ shared in our flesh and blood to redeem us from the penalty for sin, death! Moreover, it is made very clear that he intended to accomplish that by destroying the one whose deception had prompted so many of us to sin!

Then, in chapters eight, nine and ten of this epistle, the anonymous author compares the High Priest of the Old Covenant with Jesus Christ as the High Priest of the New Covenant. For us, the critical part of this narrative is found in the ninth-and tenth-chapter's depiction of the symbolism surrounding the Day of Atonement. In this passage, we learn that the High Priest of the Old Covenant needed props in the form of some animal sacrifices and two goats. Unlike Christ, the human priest could not supply his own blood for the sins of the people, and he could not carry the peoples sins away from the camp. Moreover, rather than performing this ritual once each year, we are told that Christ permanently fulfilled its symbolism. We read: "For Christ has entered, not into holy places made with hands, which are copies of the true things, but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God on our behalf. Nor was it to offer himself repeatedly, as the high priest enters the holy places every year with blood not his own, for then he would have had to suffer repeatedly since the foundation of the world. But as it is, he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment, so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him." (Hebrews 9:24-28, ESV)

Continuing the thought, in the next chapter, we read: "For since the law has but a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true form of these realities, it can never, by the same sacrifices that are continually offered every year, make perfect those who draw near. Otherwise, would they not have ceased to be offered, since the worshipers, having once been cleansed, would no longer have any consciousness of sins? But in these sacrifices, there is a reminder of sins every year. For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins." (Hebrews 10:1-4, ESV) The thought concluded with this: "And every priest stands daily at his service, offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. But when Christ had offered for all time a single sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God, waiting from that time until his enemies should be made a footstool for his feet. For by a single offering, he has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified." (Hebrews 10:11-14, ESV)

Unfortunately, in this instance, Herbert Armstrong ignored his own axiom to let the Bible interpret itself. Mr. Armstrong taught that the second goat, the goat of removal, represented Satan the Devil! Ignoring this passage, and all of the other Scriptures pertinent to understanding the symbolism of the ceremony outlined in Leviticus 16, Herbert believed that Satan was ultimately responsible for ALL of the sins that had ever been committed, and that it was consequently just to place all of those sins back on his head.

Of course, he wouldn't have believed that if he'd employed a passage from Ezekiel in his understanding of this ritual. We read there: "The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father, nor the father suffer for the iniquity of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself." (Ezekiel 18:20, ESV) In other words, "the devil made me do it" isn't going to cut it on judgment day! In short, we should all understand that God laid all of our iniquity on Jesus Christ (Isaiah 53:6), and that he was the ONE designated to take away the sins of the world (John 1:29).

Interestingly, it is the book of Revelation that ties the scriptural narrative about Satan the Devil together (Genesis-Revelation). Indeed, in the twelfth chapter of that book, we find a historical narrative that outlines Satan's role in deceiving humankind and in trying to thwart God's plans. It's there that we find one of Mr. Armstrong's favorite passages: "And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world—he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him." (Revelation 12:9, ESV) Also, consistent with what is revealed about him in the Old Testament, we read in this chapter that Satan is the one who accuses Christians (Revelation 12:10). Notice too, that Christians are said to have conquered this entity through the blood of Christ (Revelation 12:11). Then, we read: "But woe to you, O earth and sea, for the devil has come down to you in great wrath, because he knows that his time is short!" (Revelation 12:12, ESV)

The following chapters outline Satan's role in inspiring and supporting the "Beast" and "Babylon" which are symbolic of human governance of this earth. Then, finally, in the twentieth chapter of this book, we come to the END of Satan's story (Revelation 20:1-10). Notice too, that his fate is NOT to have our sins placed on his head and to wander in the wilderness! Initially, he is bound with a "chain" and imprisoned in a "bottomless pit" (Revelation 20:1-3). Finally, when the thousand-year reign of Christ and his saints is finished, we are told that the Devil is released for a brief period and is, once again, allowed to deceive humanity (Revelation 20:7-8).

Satan's ultimate fate? We read that: "the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur" (Revelation 20:10) Remember too, that Christ had said that this everlasting fire had been prepared for the Devil and his angels (Matthew 25:41). Moreover, a little later, in this same passage from Revelation, we read: "Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire." (Revelation 20:13, ESV) I don't know about you, but that sure sounds eternal and final to me!

Hence, we see that Christ has already gained the victory over Satan and the death which he introduced into the world. Satan's doom is a forgone conclusion. Throughout history, he has only been permitted to do those things which God has allowed him to do. Moreover, it is apparent that God has used Satan to further his own plans to save humanity and give us eternal life with him! In other words, Satan is clearly NOT all that! 

  


 

Saturday, October 5, 2024

Why Would I Bother to Listen or Respond to Anything That Pervert Has to Say?

I've often asked myself that question in looking back at my dalliance with the teachings of Herbert Armstrong. More recently, however, I have found myself at the receiving end of this question from some of the supporters and former supporters of Armstrong's teachings. Of course, the perversity of the question itself is not lost on me when one considers the fact that Herbie was guilty of incest, sought sex therapy, and divorced his second wife. Nevertheless, the fact that I am a Christian who also happens to be a homosexual leads some folks to ignore or dismiss anything I have to say on the subject of religion.

First, for someone who has been writing this blog for over ten years with an average of one hundred and fifty views on any given day (OK, sometimes it's five hundred to a thousand, but that's rare), it is ridiculous to even suggest that I care about going viral or am lusting after popularity. Simply stated, as someone whose own spiritual journey has been fraught with deception and abuse, I have felt like I might have something to say that would help someone else on their own spiritual journey. Indeed, I have often found myself extremely gratified by a single private comment in response to one of my posts. After all, I am acutely aware of the fact that I don't have all of the answers, and that I haven't received a Divine commission to save the world.

Nevertheless, I have been very conscientious about trying to make a positive contribution to my faith, family, friends, community, and the world around me. There was a time when I would have added country to that list, but anyone who is familiar with my posts is aware that that impulse has faded over the years. At any rate, in order to be a credible voice, I have made an extraordinary effort to be honest and believable. Toward that end, although it isn't anyone's business, I have lived a celibate life for the last two decades. In other words, I have NOT taken advantage of the freedom which I believe that I have in Jesus Christ. I live my life in accordance with the more traditional notions of Christianity related to human sexuality. I have done so in order to immunize myself against the charge of acting and teaching in my own self-interest. Stated yet another way, I cannot be charged with hypocrisy if I'm living according to the dictates of the consciences of potential critics! To be blunter, there is NO "homosexual behavior" happening in my own life.

Even so, some of the folks who have accepted the words of an incestuous pedophile (Herbie) and/or the words of a lying, adulterous, egocentric bully (Donald Trump) are quick to dismiss or ignore what little old me has to say! It reminds me of something that Paul warned Timothy about so many years ago. He wrote: "For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching but having itching ears, they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions (II Timothy 4:3, ESV)." Oh well, if someone ignores or dismisses something out-of-hand, life is a lot easier - they don't have to actually answer or refute any challenges to their belief system! Yes, I completely understand. My thanks to those among you who have eyes to see and ears to hear and aren't afraid to entertain ideas which contradict your own beliefs.

Friday, October 4, 2024

Is It Love?

A friend recently sent me a link to an article from the Bible.org website titled All That Heaven Allows: Homosexuality and the Meaning of Love and solicited my opinion on it. The central thesis of the article is contained in the following paragraph: "We have just spoken about the need for love in the ethical debate over homosexuality. We live in a society that is obsessed with love. Our songs glorify it and our ads glamorize it. But the homosexual debate, probably more than any other issue, exposes a troublesome fact about our society: we don’t even agree about what love is. The central claim of the homosexual rights movement is that gays and lesbians should be allowed to love in their own way, and that a failure to accept them and their lifestyle as a permanent and open part of society is a failure to love. The central claim of all those who reject homosexuality is that it is an unacceptable way to express love. Thus, simply calling upon everyone to 'love' one another, without coming to some common understanding of what that means, will not solve the homosexual debate."

First, the focus of the Law of Christ is LOVE: Loving God with our whole heart and soul and loving each other as Christ loved us. Christ wants his followers to treat each other in the same fashion that they would like to be treated by others. This kind of LOVE seeks to minister to the needs of others - it is NOT self-seeking or self-justifying. Hence, it is fundamentally different from what our society is obsessed with!

Second, the central claim of the "homosexual rights movement" is NOT "that gays and lesbians should be allowed to love in their own way." What our community really wants is to be allowed to love in the very same way that heterosexuals love. Homosexuals want to be able to express their romantic feelings for another person in the same manner that heterosexuals express romantic feeling for their partners. Homosexuals want to be able to make the same commitment to their partner that heterosexuals are allowed to make to theirs. Hence, we are NOT seeking to love in a way that is different from the way that heterosexuals love their partners. In short, we want to be able to love our partners in exactly the same way that other folks love their partners! Moreover, the failure of society to permit homosexuals from doing so is inherently discriminatory and is NOT a reflection of the kind of love described in Scripture.

Third, Scripture defines the expression of love as showing patience, kindness, compassion, humility, and forgiveness to others (I Corinthians 13:4-7). That same passage precludes envy, boasting, rudeness, insisting on your own view being the standard for everyone else, rejoicing over the mistreatment of others, or cutting others off from your love. Indeed, Paul went on to say that true love never ends (I Corinthians 13:8)!

The article goes on to state that "the Old Testament Law specifies what behaviors and attitudes are inconsistent with love so we will not fool ourselves into thinking that we are exhibiting love when we are not. It also sets forth positive instruction in how we are to love one another in our marriages, families, friendships, and communities. Biblical morality is a morality of love, and nothing more or less..." NO, Jesus and Paul preached that "the Old Testament Law" is fulfilled by LOVE and was fulfilled by Jesus Christ (Matthew 5:17-20, 22:37-40 and Romans 13:8-10). Also, we must not forget that the Old Testament Law was directed at Israel - it was an integral part of God's covenant with THEM!

Even so, you will notice that ALL of the commandments related to male sexual behavior are directed at protecting their sexual partners, and the man himself, from hurt or harm (see Leviticus 18 and 20). Moreover, we can easily discern the application of this principle in commandments like those that forbid incest, bestiality, and adultery. In other words, the harm to both of the participants in the prohibited behavior is (or should be) obvious to everyone.

What about those commandments related to homosexual behaviors? I would answer that question this way: If we understand the behavior(s) which the author intended, we should be able to clearly discern the hurt/harm inherent to the prohibited behavior. In this respect, we could say that prohibited sexual behaviors (those of both a heterosexual and homosexual nature) were intended to protect the Israelites from hurting/harming themselves or someone else. Thus, when we understand that rape is always wrong, and that it would be especially onerous to treat guests in such a way, we begin to see the hurt and harm that the Sodomites wanted to inflict on their angelic visitors! In other words, what the Sodomites had in mind did NOT involve love, fidelity, or hospitality, and it should be clear that such behavior could have inflicted great harm on everyone (especially the visitors)!

Now, let's take a look at a couple of those Torah commandments. The two most prominent texts targeting homosexual activity are found in Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13. First, we should note that these commandments, as were most of the other commandments found in Torah, were addressed specifically to the MEN of Israel. 

Moreover, in order to understand the context of these commandments it is crucial that we have some awareness of the sexual culture of the ancient peoples of the Middle East. In short, it was common practice to involve both male and female prostitution in the worship of pagan gods. Likewise, it was not uncommon for adult males to engage in pederasty (sexual relationships with male children). Finally, both male and female slaves were often forced to have sexual relations with their owners. Hopefully, we can all see that these types of homosexual behaviors are NOT consistent with loving one's neighbor and doing no harm to him.

We should also note that these ancient peoples had a very limited understanding of the workings of the human body and mind. For example, our modern notion of a "sexual orientation" or "sexual preference" would have been wholly unknown to them! Likewise, they were completely unaware of the presence and workings of hormones like estrogen and testosterone. Hence, it is reasonable to conclude that the same-sex behavior being confronted in these commandments is consistent with the types of behaviors which were common to that time and place! After all, I would defy anyone to identify any hurt or harm associated with two adults enjoying coitus within the context of a loving, consensual relationship.

Moreover, the foundational Ten Words/Commandments of Torah makes infidelity/unfaithfulness a sin within the context of any committed relationship (see Exodus 20:14). What's more, once again, we can clearly discern how infidelity could inflict real hurt on your partner, family, self, and the likelihood that it would do the same to your partner in crime and his/her spouse and family. Finally, I sincerely hope that no one would be foolish enough to suggest that this standard was intended to only apply to heterosexual males. How much sense does it make to suggest that the same standard (fidelity) doesn't apply to females or homosexuals? Is anyone seriously going to suggest that those other groups were exempted from being faithful? Doesn't that strike all of us as being just a little bit absurd? After all, if we truly love someone, does it make sense that we would want to pursue someone else to satisfy our personal lust or need for intimacy?

Now, while most of us understand that Christians are NOT under the Law of Moses - that we are saved by grace and faith within the context of Jesus Christ (and that we are expected to operate within the bounds of the Law of Christ going forward), some will point to a couple of passages in the New Testament to suggest that ALL homosexual behavior is SIN (By the way, hopefully, NO ONE is suggesting that ALL heterosexual behavior is righteous)! Of course, in this connection, EVERYONE must admit that Jesus of Nazareth was SILENT on the subject of homosexuality!

Nevertheless, we read in Paul's epistle to the Romans that "God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error." (Romans 1:26-27, ESV) Once again, the context of those times was temple prostitution, pederasty, and sexual exploitation of slaves. Moreover, I would submit that all three of those homosexual behaviors are inconsistent with both our own natures and the Law of Christ, and that the resulting hurt/harm should be obvious to all of us!

Likewise, Paul's warning to the saints at Corinth about unrighteous behavior excluding those who indulge in it from God's Kingdom (I Corinthians 6:9). Once again, without the context of the sexual behaviors and knowledge of the folks of that time, the passage is rendered undecipherable! In other words, it is a gross mischaracterization of these passages to say that they exclude all homosexual behaviors!

Thus, we can see that LOVE IS LOVE. Christians (straight or gay) are subject to the SAME moral standards in Scripture. Indeed, it is ridiculous to suggest that there is one standard for heterosexuals and another for homosexuals. Love fulfills the requirements of the Law. If love is absent there is sin. If love is absent, there is hurt and harm. If your nature is to be attracted to males, then it would be contrary to that nature to have sexual relations with a woman (and it would be inherently unfair and hurtful to her). Now, there are many things in Scripture that are difficult to understand, this is NOT one of them!

Thursday, October 3, 2024

The Feast of Trumpets

Although Christians are NOT obligated to observe this festival, there is much in it that relates to Jesus Christ and has deep meaning for his disciples. Jews call this festival Rosh Hashanah. For them, it is the "Head of the Year" - their New Year. It is also the day which they believe that God created both the universe and Adam and Eve. (see Chabad.org: What Is Rosh Hashanah?) In Torah, it is referred to as "a day of solemn rest, a memorial proclaimed with blast of trumpets, a holy convocation." (Leviticus 23:24, ESV) In addition to all of this, the Israelites were instructed to "present a food offering to the Lord." (Leviticus 23:25, ESV)

Now, first, it is important to understand that ALL of the various elements of Torah (Sabbaths, festivals, sacrifices/offerings, rituals, ceremonies, clean/unclean, etc.) pointed to Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus said that he came to this earth to fulfill Torah and the prophets. Likewise, Paul told the saints at Colossae that things like Sabbaths, festivals and New Moons were shadows of future things, and that Christ was the reality to which they pointed. Moreover, the epistle to the Hebrews makes clear that the Sabbath, priesthood, sacrifices, and ceremonies related to the Tabernacle, Holy of Holies, and Day of Atonement pointed to the reality found in Jesus of Nazareth.

Hence, returning to the Jewish meaning of the day, we can see how Jesus is the "Head of the Year" - the start of a new life, age, and kingdom! In similar fashion, we know that the New Testament reveals that God created all things through Jesus Christ. Likewise, we know that Christ is referred to in the New Testament as the bread of life - that his body is real food, and we know that he offered himself to God for us! Once again, we are told that Christ is the ultimate Sabbath. He is the One who makes it possible for us to truly rest from our own works. Finally, the New Testament clearly associated the blowing of trumpets with the tribulation prior to his return, the announcement of his return, and the resurrection of those whom he has already redeemed from death. Moreover, by definition, the ekklesia is an assembly of Christ's disciples. In the truest sense of the word, it is a Holy convocation!

Thus, we see that the blasting of Trumpets clearly found fulfillment in the person of Jesus of Nazareth. In short, this Festival points to Christ's creation of this world, and the fact that he will eventually do away with the very flawed human systems (religious and political) extant in our times.

Monday, September 30, 2024

Pledges, Oaths, and Service to the Nations of This World?

In the Hebrew Torah, pledges and oaths, along with the service which flows from them, are regarded as sacred responsibilities to God and/or the people to whom they apply. Indeed, this concept is nowhere more apparent than in the Jewish Shema (a daily declaration of faith). In their article on The Shema, Chabad.org informs us that "Shema Yisrael (שְׁמַע יִשְׂרָאֵל) ('Hear, O Israel') are the first two words of a section of the Torah that is the centerpiece of the morning and evening prayer services, encapsulating the monotheistic essence of Judaism: 'Hear, O Israel: G‑d is our L‑rd, G‑d is one.'" They go on to tell us that "the Shema consists of three paragraphs: Deuteronomy 6:4–9, Deuteronomy 11:13–21 and Numbers 15:37–41."

The really critical passage is as follows: "You shall love the L-rd your G‑d with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your might. And these words which I command you today shall be upon your heart. You shall teach them thoroughly to your children, and you shall speak of them when you sit in your house and when you walk on the road, when you lie down and when you rise. You shall bind them as a sign upon your hand, and they shall be for a reminder between your eyes. And you shall write them upon the doorposts of your house and upon your gates." In other words, The Shema was intended to be a reminder to the Jews that their primary allegiance was to the God of Israel and "his" standards. In the New Living Translation, that critical verse is translated: "Tie them to your hands and wear them on your forehead as reminders."

In short, Israel was expected to be devoted to God. This, of course, would make them very different from the nations which surrounded them, and the peoples who had previously inhabited the land which had been promised to them. In Deuteronomy, we read: "When the Lord your God cuts off before you the nations whom you go in to dispossess, and you dispossess them and dwell in their land, take care that you be not ensnared to follow them, after they have been destroyed before you, and that you do not inquire about their gods, saying, ‘How did these nations serve their gods?—that I also may do the same.’ You shall not worship the Lord your God in that way, for every abominable thing that the Lord hates they have done for their gods, for they even burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods." (Deuteronomy 12: 29-31, ESV) A little later, in the same book, we read: "When you come into the land that the Lord your God is giving you, you shall not learn to follow the abominable practices of those nations." (Deuteronomy 18:9, ESV) Clearly, the other nations did NOT serve the God of Israel - they served other gods.

Later, it is important to note that Israel grew tired of being different and wanted to be more like the nations which surrounded them (I Samuel 8:4-5). Continuing in this account, we read that Samuel was displeased with this request, but God told him to "Obey the voice of the people in all that they say to you, for they have not rejected you, but they have rejected me from being king over them." (I Samuel 8:6-7, ESV). Clearly, God expected "his" people to be different from the other nations of the earth, and their failure to do so would have far reaching consequences for them, and the covenant which God had made with them. Indeed, throughout the major and minor prophets of the Hebrew Scriptures, Israel's bad behavior is contrasted with that of the nations which surrounded them (and Israel often did not fare well in the comparison).

Even so, the greatest examples of how NOT to act as a nation, are found in the book of Daniel, and the nation which would become the epitome of human governance and service to false gods was BABYLON! In that book, we see the king of Babylon subjugating the people of Israel (as well as many other peoples in that part of the world). Indeed, that king's relentless pursuit of wealth, power, and glory became legendary! Nevertheless, throughout this narrative, the human king at its center (whichever of the four kingdoms he represented: Babylon, Persia, Greece, or Rome) demanded the absolute allegiance of his subjects. And, like Nebuchadnezzar before them, they pursued military might and used it to conquer the peoples of other lands. Moreover, they viewed both the human and natural resources of the earth as being at their disposal - as theirs to exploit and use to garner even more wealth and power. In fact, the way that human governance is portrayed in this book would become the symbolic standard for the apocalyptic writings of the New Testament book of Revelation.

In the thirteenth chapter of that book, we read about a human kingdom referred to as "the beast." John wrote: "And to it the dragon gave his power and his throne and great authority...the whole earth marveled as they followed the beast. And they worshiped the dragon, for he had given his authority to the beast, and they worshiped the beast, saying, 'Who is like the beast, and who can fight against it?'" (Revelation 13:2-4, ESV) Notice that, like the kingdoms and the beasts which represented them in the book of Daniel, that this beast exercises great authority and influence throughout the earth. We are informed that it is WORSHIPED (as a false god), and it is boasted that no one can stand against its military might! A little later, we are informed that this beast "opened its mouth to utter blasphemies against God, blaspheming his name and his dwelling, that is, those who dwell in heaven. Also it was allowed to make war on the saints and to conquer them. And authority was given it over every tribe and people and language and nation, and all who dwell on earth will worship it..." (Revelation 13:6-8, ESV)

Now, in light of what we have already discussed, it is of particular interest to us that a second beast is mentioned in this chapter which we are told "exercises all the authority of the first beast." (Revelation 13:11-12, ESV) Moreover, it is revealed that this beast deceives the whole world into worshiping the first beast and has the power to kill anyone who doesn't do that! (Revelation 13:13-15) Finally, this beast also "causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name." (Revelation 13:16-17, ESV) Notice, that just like the symbol which reminded the Israelites that their primary allegiance was owed to God, this "Mark of the Beast" is worn on the right hand or the forehead! Hence, this mark is a symbol of the people's allegiance to the beast! Indeed, we are told that one cannot even participate in its commerce without it!

Interestingly, for Christians, Jesus identified Two Commandments as comprehending the entirety of the Law. According to him, the greatest commandment was "You shall love the L-rd your G‑d with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your might." The second greatest was to love your neighbor as yourself (See Matthew 22:34-40). Moreover, he said that after just having been asked about paying taxes to Rome. His reply? "Give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar and give to God what belongs to God." In other words, Christians were to be good citizens of the empire - subject to it, but NOT serving or worshiping it (that was reserved for God)! In that same account, Christ was reported to have said: "No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money." (Matthew 6:24, ESV) And, although Christ contrasted service to God with service to money in this instance, the context makes clear that we could substitute ANY other thing for money!

Jesus also made it very clear that he did not want his followers to exercise authority in the same way that the leadership of the world exercised the authority that had been given to it. He said: "You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones exercise authority over them. It shall not be so among you. But whoever would be great among you must be your servant, and whoever would be first among you must be your slave, even as the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many." (Matthew 20:25-28, ESV) Clearly, Christ did NOT want his disciples to follow human notions about authority. Indeed, Christ demanded that his followers walk a fine line - they were to be subject to human authorities, but NOT be like them!

Christ's perspective on this was underscored in his own prayer to God shortly before he was put to death by the Roman Governor of Judea. He prayed: "I have given them your word, and the world has hated them because they are not of the world, just as I am not of the world. I do not ask that you take them out of the world, but that you keep them from the evil one. They are not of the world, just as I am not of the world. Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth. As you sent me into the world, so I have sent them into the world." (John 17:14-18, ESV) Clearly, Christ believed that following God's instructions would distinguish his people from those who were part of the world around them. And, once again, he said: "By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another." (John 13:35, ESV)

Finally, Christ's attitude toward human authority was underscored by what he said to the Roman governor just before he was to be beaten and crucified. He said: "My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world." (John 18:36, ESV) Later, we read of this exchange between Jesus and the governor: "So Pilate said to him, 'You will not speak to me? Do you not know that I have authority to release you and authority to crucify you?' Jesus answered him, 'You would have no authority over me at all unless it had been given you from above.'" (John 19:10-11, ESV) Notice that Christ acknowledged his authority (and later submitted to it), but he clearly understood who had the ultimate authority - the final word!

This is also consistent with what the Apostle Paul wrote to the disciples at Rome. He said: "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore, whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God's wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore, one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God's wrath but also for the sake of conscience. For because of this you also pay taxes, for the authorities are ministers of God, attending to this very thing. Pay to all what is owed to them: taxes to whom taxes are owed, revenue to whom revenue is owed, respect to whom respect is owed, honor to whom honor is owed. Owe no one anything, except to love each other, for the one who loves another has fulfilled the law." (Romans 13:1-8, ESV) Peter said the same thing in fewer words: "Honor everyone. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the emperor." (I Peter 2:17, ESV)

Clearly, Christians in the First Century understood that there was an invisible but very real boundary between their responsibilities as citizens, and their actual participation in the human system which reigned over them. They understood that people of faith must be strangers and exiles on this earth (Hebrews 11:13-16, ESV). In short, Christians must seek a better country - the one that has been prepared for them by God! We must understand that our primary citizenship is in God's Kingdom (Philippians 3:20). Indeed, in the verses which preceded the one quoted above from Peter's epistle, we have a very articulate summary of the boundaries between the two systems. He wrote: "But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light. Once you were not a people, but now you are God's people; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy. Beloved, I urge you as sojourners and exiles to abstain from the passions of the flesh, which wage war against your soul. Keep your conduct among the Gentiles honorable, so that when they speak against you as evildoers, they may see your good deeds and glorify God on the day of visitation. Be subject for the Lord's sake to every human institution, whether it be to the emperor as supreme, or to governors as sent by him to punish those who do evil and to praise those who do good. For this is the will of God, that by doing good you should put to silence the ignorance of foolish people. Live as people who are free, not using your freedom as a cover-up for evil, but living as servants of God." (I Peter 2:9-16, ESV)

Hence, when we return to the book of Revelation, the text of that book begins to make even more sense in terms of participating in the "beast's" system. Indeed, whatever your views on the proper interpretation of that book (past, present, or future), we can see that the text is clearly about man's system being fundamentally at odds with a Christian's participation in it! The text of that book refers to a "Great Prostitute" who rides the "beast," "And on her forehead was written a name of mystery: 'Babylon the great, mother of prostitutes and of earth's abominations.' And I saw the woman, drunk with the blood of the saints, the blood of the martyrs of Jesus." (Revelation 17:1-6, ESV) Of course, eventually, this unholy alliance will fall apart (Revelation 17:7-14). Continuing in this text, however, we learn: "The waters that you saw, where the prostitute is seated, are peoples and multitudes and nations and languages...And the woman that you saw is the great city that has dominion over the kings of the earth." (Revelation 17:15-18, ESV) Whatever you and I think about this passage, it is clear that folks in the First Century would have recognized that "great city" as Rome! Notice too, that the woman is symbolically referred to as "Babylon" - clearly suggesting the same kind of human authority dealt with in the book of Daniel.

The story continues into the next chapter, and we find out there that the city falls (Revelation 18:1-3). Continuing, we read: "Then I heard another voice from heaven saying, 'Come out of her, my people, lest you take part in her sins, lest you share in her plagues; for her sins are heaped high as heaven, and God has remembered her iniquities. Pay her back as she herself has paid back others and repay her double for her deeds; mix a double portion for her in the cup she mixed. As she glorified herself and lived in luxury, so give her a like measure of torment and mourning, since in her heart she says, ‘I sit as a queen, I am no widow and mourning I shall never see.’ For this reason, her plagues will come in a single day, death and mourning and famine, and she will be burned up with fire; for mighty is the Lord God who has judged her." (Revelation 18:4-8, ESV) The very clear implication is that God doesn't want "his" people participating in Babylon! Indeed, the chapter ends with this observation about the woman: "in her was found the blood of prophets and of saints, and of all who have been slain on earth." (Revelation 18:24, ESV)

Let's take a moment and review. From a Scriptural perspective, Christians are expected to remember at all times that their PRIMARY allegiance is owed to God and "his" kingdom - that we are, first and foremost, citizens of the Kingdom of Heaven. Second, we are expected to be good citizens of the nation/kingdom/empire where we live, and that means obeying the laws, paying our taxes, and praying for the leaders. Third, we are NOT supposed to become a part of its political system. So, where do we draw the line? Each of us must ultimately answer to the dictates of our own consciences and Almighty God. For me, it seems very clear that holding office or serving in the military would constitute participating in the human system of a nation. Now, I understand the reasoning of some folks who would add voting and serving on juries to those things. Personally, I believe that those two areas are seen by some folks as one of the duties of citizenship, but I think that the answer must depend on to what degree one feels comfortable in participating in the human system. I did serve in the United States Army once upon a time and felt that it was compatible with my conscience at the time. Would I make the same decision today? Obviously, I would NOT!

"But a democracy is different!" some will insist. Is it? Does the United States demand the allegiance of its citizens? Does the United States glory in its military might? Do the President, Congress, and the Courts exercise their authority over the folks they are supposed to be serving? Does partisanship in American society lead to compassion, mercy, forgiveness, honesty, patience, peace, kindness, joy, etc.? Do the institutions of the United States require oaths and/or pledges of allegiance to them? Does America employ its power in the areas of trade and economic dominance over other nations? Has the United States ever employed military might to advance its agenda? Has the United States government ever exploited its own citizens or resources? I ask again: Is the United States really that different from the Babylonian model?

I think that there is another question that is even more important in determining our degree of participation in a human system: What does the Government of the United States expect from its citizens who participate in its governance? Of course, most of us who live in the U.S. have recited "The Pledge of Allegiance" from time to time: "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." In this connection, we should also note that it is proper protocol to stand facing the flag with your right hand over your heart when reciting the pledge. I remember when I took the "Oath of Enlistment" in the Army, I was required to say: "I, Lonnie Hendrix, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." Likewise, the President and other officers of our government are required to swear allegiance to the United States Constitution. Hence, we should all be asking ourselves as citizens of THE KINGDOM, what does it mean to swear or affirm allegiance to a nation of this earth?

Could that be why Jesus had something very specific to say about oaths during his earthly ministry? In his famous "Sermon on the Mount," he said: "you have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform to the Lord what you have sworn.’ But I say to you, Do not take an oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God, or by the earth, for it is his footstool, or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. And do not take an oath by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black. Let what you say be simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything more than this comes from evil (or the evil one)." (Matthew 5:33-37, ESV) Hence, for those of us who profess to be disciples of Jesus Christ, I would say that we all need to ask ourselves: "To what extent should I participate in the Babylonian governments of this world?" OR "How close can I get to this flame without being burned by it?" OR "Do I want God's mark on my forehead and hand, or the Beast's mark there?" One last question: Is that old profession of "God and country" really consistent with having no other gods besides (or next to) THE GOD? What do you think?



Sunday, September 29, 2024

CGI Can’t Decide About Whether or Not to Allow Politics in Church!


The leadership of the Church of God International continues to try to straddle the fence on whether pastors and members should be involved in secular politics. Folks like Jeff Reed, Mike James, and Vance Stinson argue in favor of neutrality - while folks like Bill Watson, Adrian Davis, and Murray Palmatier see absolutely nothing wrong with their partisanship. Indeed, in spite of severe criticism, the politicians continue to be loud and proud about their foray into that realm. In reality, although most of the membership of CGI is very conservative and very Republican, the membership remains very divided on the issue of political involvement on a corporate level. Moreover, neither side appears to be satisfied with the leadership’s wishy-washy “neutrality.” In other words, it feels awfully lukewarm within CGI these days!

Although the Church of God International’s leadership has apparently decided to mothball their Armor of God program and have removed Bill Watson from their payroll, in the latest edition of their Prove All Things: Politics and Voting webcast (Reed and James) interviewed ACOG member and proud Montana Republican, Bill Lussenheide. For those of you who may be unfamiliar with Mr. Lussenheide, he is completely comfortable with his role as a partisan officeholder and supports the Republican Party’s platform in his state “one hundred percent!” In other words, he feels absolutely no conflict between the religion he professes and fully participating in partisan politics! Indeed, just like Ohio Bill, this Montana Bill believes that he is defending his faith and proclaiming the Gospel through his participation in the political process.

Speaking of that other Bill, Mr. Watson recently defended his own messaging on politics on his News Alert Blog on CGI Medina, Ohio’s website. Bill wrote: “I recently read an article by Caroline Woods (from The Blaze) that was rather interesting, especially since I have been accused of being ‘political’ more times than I can count. There are people today that think the pulpit should be exclusively reserved to address the Bible and only the Bible. They claim, to use the pulpit to address social issues, underscored by the Bible, is wrong and is out of order. That those pastors, should simply remain on point and only speak on Christian Living––stay away from social issues!” He went on to point out that pastors have addressed current events throughout the history of the United States (the old they did it before me excuse). Mr. Watson continued: “Keep in mind, those who shrink back in ‘cowardice’ from addressing the issues of our day forget; it’s not the Church that has become political, but rather, politics has become more excessive in violating our religion and God’s Church needs to stand firm and show our people their sins (Isa 58:1).” Watson clearly believes himself to be courageous and right, and that he consequently can’t be wrong in what he is doing!

If that doesn’t sound like circular reasoning to you, it should! In a recent post on my own blog The Allure of Politics for Christians, I pointed out that “In their desire to promote righteousness and God's will, Christians have too often found themselves drawn into the political systems of this world. Unfortunately, instead of influencing things in a better direction, the Christian often finds him/herself participating in a process which interrupts his/her focus on God, distorts the distinction between good and evil and causes him/her to compromise with the dictates of his/her faith and conscience. One candidate or policy seems to be the right one at the time we are considering the alternatives, but we often learn later that our choice(s) produced unintended negative consequences. In other words, in our attempt to avert an evil outcome, we often set the stage for an even worse future than the one we were trying to avoid!”

Next, I proceeded to point out many of the Biblical warnings against participating in the affairs of this world and to avoid being drawn into idolatry of the state. I also pointed out that Christ NEVER challenged or criticized Rome or its representatives in Judea, that he reserved his harshest rhetoric for the Jewish religious leaders of his day. Finally, I concluded with some advice that I think folks within CGI’s leadership would do well to heed: “Unfortunately, we Christians sometimes forget that we are strangers and pilgrims on this earth, and that our primary citizenship resides in heaven (Hebrews 11:13-16). Our salvation, spiritual and physical, is found in God's plan. In short, the political systems which humankind has devised are flawed, and they will fail someday. We must not forget that our faith and hope is found in God, and him alone! (Psalm 118:8)” While there is certainly nothing wrong with setting a good example and helping others in the here and now, it is NOT our commission or responsibility as Christians to fix the flawed political systems of this world!