Featured Post

The Christian Perspective on the Old Testament

Unfortunately, too many Christians have allowed themselves to harbor extreme views with regard to the role which they permit the Old Testame...

Saturday, January 30, 2021

from whence cometh these blessings?

It is a notion as old as time: We must have what we have, because God gave it all to us. The wealthy and the powerful have often justified their circumstances, both to themselves and others, by claiming God as the source of their wealth and power.

Notions like "God made me king" or "God ordained that we should possess this land" have been used to justify all manner of evil from the dawn of time. Indeed, for many millennia of human history, people have employed these arguments to justify the executions and slaughter of anyone who opposed them or in any way impeded their access to what they believed God had given them. And, in a grotesque kind of circular reasoning, they have argued that their triumph over their competitors/enemies supplies the necessary evidence or proof that God intended for them to have it in the first place!

This is the reasoning that underpins things like the Divine Right to Rule, White Christian Nationalism and Anglo-Israelism. The existing order is the way that God intended for things to be - otherwise, they wouldn't be the way that they are! After all, God gave the Israelites their land, and God decreed that the Assyrians and Babylonians would conquer them. God decreed that the Greeks and Romans would rule the world. Isn't that right? Didn't God tell Daniel "that the Most High rules over the kingdoms of the world. He gives them to anyone he chooses..." (Daniel 4:17)? Didn't God tell the Israelites that he was the source of everything that they had (Deuteronomy 8:17-18)? Didn't they call it the "Promised Land" for good reason?

In the United States, this kind of thinking has been used to justify the dispossession and extermination of Native Americans, the enslavement and further mistreatment of Africans, imperialism, the exploitation of our natural environment and resources and to deny to women their equal rights as citizens of this republic. In more recent times, this kind of thinking has been used to justify the harsh treatment of immigrants, the erosion of the rights of labor, the destruction of the middle class and the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few. And all of this has been justified by claiming that it has been carried out according to God's will.

In an article for the Berkley Forum, Philip Gorski wrote: "To understand how American Christianity became so entangled with racism and violence, we first have to trace it back to its scriptural roots. Those roots are dual. It turns out that WCN [White Christian Nationalism] is not just one story, but two. The first is a promised land story. The New England Puritans saw themselves as the heirs of the biblical Israelites. They imagined themselves as a 'chosen people,' and they came to see the 'new world' as their 'promised land.' And as their relationship with the natives shifted from curiosity to hostility, they began to see the Indians as 'Canaanites,' who had to be conquered." He continued: "The second story is an end times story. Most Christian theologians read Revelation in allegorical terms, as a depiction of the moral struggles within the believer’s heart. But some interpreted the text more literally, as a description of bloody struggles to come. That is how many Puritan radicals read it, and they exported those ideas to New England." see White Christian Nationalism: The Deep Story Behind the Capitol Insurrection

In the same article, Gorski went on to explain how these notions were applied to the American experience over time. He wrote: "But how did Protestantism and Englishness get entangled with whiteness? To answer that question, we need to shift our focus to Virginia. There, and elsewhere, the most common justification for the enslavement of kidnapped Indians and Africans was that they were 'heathens.' But this argument broke down in the late-seventeenth century as some enslaved persons converted to Christianity and some white Christians sought to evangelize them. The problem was initially resolved by shifting the legal basis of slavery from religion to color: 'Blacks' could be slaves; 'whites' could not. It was then more fully resolved by creating a new theological basis for slavery. Perhaps the most influential was the 'Curse of Ham.' Blacks were the descendants of Noah’s son, Ham, the argument went, and their color and enslavement were a result of the curse that Noah had called down on head."

In the most recent manifestation of this notion of White Christian Nationalism [WCN], Gorski explains how Trump has taken advantage of these historical threads and motivated a new movement within the United States. He concluded: "Trumpism is, among other things, the latest version of the WCN frame. Echoing the promised land story, Trump says he will 'take back the country' from the outsiders and invaders who have taken control—immigrants and secularists, Muslims and Mexicans—and then restore it to its rightful owners: 'real' (that is, white, Christian) Americans. Echoing the end times story, Trump paints the world in terms of us and them, good and evil, and hints at violent struggles to come. The first such struggle took place on January 6, 2021. It will not, I fear, be the last." And, of course, what Gorski didn't mention is the fact that "God must have placed Trump in office to accomplish these things."

Nevertheless, this kind of thinking fails to account for some other very important Biblical concepts that undermine the use of those scriptures in Daniel and Deuteronomy as justifications for bad behavior. Indeed, in their proper context, the verses cited in Daniel and Deuteronomy suggest that bad behavior will only result in the loss of whatever blessings a person/people has/have received. The Bible also informs us that sometimes the wicked prosper and the righteous suffer. In other words, wealth and power are NOT always indicative of God's favor (see Ecclesiastes 7 and 8 and Luke 16:19-31). Christ taught that promised rewards and blessings will not necessarily be received in this world/life (see Matthew 5:1-12 and Luke 16:19-31). Jesus also taught his disciples that God "gives his sunlight to both the evil and the good, and he sends rain on the just and the unjust alike." (see Matthew 5:45) And, in a similar vein, Scripture also teaches us that disaster doesn't just befall the wicked - that there is a thing called time and chance at work in the world (see Ecclesiastes 9:11 and Luke 13:1-5).

In conclusion, while we should always be thankful for the good things that we have received, those blessings should never be seen as an entitlement. Blessings should never be used as a justification to oppress others or to deprive them of their blessings. If you are fortunate enough to be blessed with some wealth, power or privilege in this life, then just be thankful for what you have received and be very careful not to do anything which might warrant its removal or earn you some future punishment!


12 comments:

  1. A comment posted to my private e-mail account:

    "I would just add that if we do have blessings, then we have a responsibility to use them to become, ourselves, a source of blessing to others."

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would describe myself as moderately conservative - to the right of center. I have a lot of idealism about people getting along with each other. I like what you wrote, Miller, and don't really find anything I disagree with. But that is my idealism gland secreting. I would like Millennial conditions to be here now. But they are not.

    The comedian Flip Wilson used to talk about "The church of what's happening now." Sometimes I have to drop the idealism for a while, walk into that church and take a seat. So I have an observation that is discordant with everything else I believe in but nevertheless keeps nagging at me. I am wondering how many other Americans are dealing with this same feelings. Here it goes:

    I am sometimes glad that all the Trump crazies, belligerent and pugnacious, are around. I am glad that 74 million people voted for Trump. I awaken some mornings to an America that is being overtaken by Black and Brown people with their inexorable birth rates. Soon they will be in the majority and they have no love for White Americans and realistically they should not have because of the events of history. We all know the events. And a peaceful future is not augured.

    I also know that because of my readiness to pursue idealistic solutions, because of my feelings of conciliation that Black and Brown people are not afraid of me and my type. They are afraid of Donald Trump's people. Here are the words of that famous fictional character Col. Nathan R. Jessep:

    "You cant handle the truth! Son we live in a world that has walls, and those have to be guarded by men with guns. Whose gonna do it you, you lieutenant Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago, and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury of not knowing what I know, that Santiago's death while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence while grotesque and incomprehensible, to you, saves lives. You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall! We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something, you use them as a punch line. I have neither the time, nor the inclination, to explain myself to a man, who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide, and then questions the manner, in which I provide it. I'd rather you just say 'thank you' and go on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a weapon, and stand at post. Either way, I don't give a damn, what you think you are entitled to!"

    I don't like Trump's people but I know they stand, bristling with guns and confederate flags, between me and a kind of America that might not tolerate my presence because of my perceived race. We may be on the doorstep of a racial civil war. I can usually pass for Caucasian - not always. So this is a dilemma. I have my moments of ambivalence. I am not ready to say that the 74 million can take a flying leap. I need to see a tenable solution on the horizon that would make the 74 million irrelevant. I don't see that yet.

    ******* Click on my moniker to view my Disclaimer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NEO,

      The trepidation which you described is what has motivated support for Trump. Some white Americans are not only afraid of "losing their country" - they are also afraid of a spirit of vengeance on the other side.
      The problem, however, is largely one of perception. Most of these folks view things through the lens of white folks vs folks of color. As you know, the reality is that most "African Americans" have significant percentages of European ethnicity in their DNA. Likewise, most Latino Americans have significant percentages of Native American, European and African ethnicities that are part of their genetic heritage. There is also a significant amount of European heritage and African heritage present within our current Native American population. Add to all of that the not insignificant phenomenon of interracial marriages with Asians and other ethnicities within the United States, and the notions of one race vs another becomes absurd. We may not be a "melting pot" yet, but any notions of purity are far removed from the reality on the ground.
      While my own ancestry is overwhelmingly white European, my Autosomal DNA also demonstrates small amounts of African, Native American and Jewish ancestry. Based on my knowledge of other white Americans who have participated in DNA testing, I know that I am also not unique in this respect. Again, the very notion of a white American is somewhat illusory.
      I am not, however, suggesting that the traditional perceptions are unimportant - I know they are. The old axiom that perception is often more important than reality is certainly applicable here. Even so, unless we suddenly descend into a new Dark Age, I'm thinking that our awareness of the reality will only grow with time.
      Does the future hold a Civil War? I don't know. I've never claimed to be a prophet. Nevertheless, I have contemplated that possibility on my political blog. Circumstances and prophetic Scripture do tend to evoke a negative outlook relative to our immediate future as a species.
      However, like you, I look forward to Divine intervention. I believe in the Hebrew God and his son, Jesus Christ. I also don't believe that they are going to let us slip away into oblivion. We may very well go through the flames between here and there, but I still have faith in the ultimate outcome of the story.
      One thing that Herbert Armstrong used to say still rings true to me: I've read the book, and we win!

      Delete
  3. The possibility of a race based war is the Elephant in the Room. The right-wing wants a healthy gun rights law because they want a well armed population of "patriots" that are willing to fight such a war. But that is never the issue in the debate presented in the media. For the right-wing a Sandy Hook is the acceptable cost of having an unofficial standing army of very well armed citizens ready to wage war in the event of a minority uprising. This is also why a Black being killed by the police for a burnt out taillight is also an acceptable cost to the right-wing. The loss of some low income Whites is also an acceptable cost to the right-wing for a pandemic that targets principally Blacks and Browns. I find it disturbing that the media will tell of the tragic loss of a family to the pandemic and the family will typically be Hispanic. This is the kind of feedback that encourages the right-wing to promote complacency about the Covid "hoax."

    Political division gets a lot of play in the media but the racial division that forms the substrate on which the political division rests seems to be invisible. I believe this nation has real problems and does not have the spiritual depth on all sides to deal with it. Escalation of the conflict is inevitable.

    Also, regarding one of your comments. I am a member of a Native American tribe. I am familiar with many of the tribes in Oklahoma and the mountain states. Very few Native Americans will intermarry with Blacks. Whereas they will readily intermarry with Whites. Back in the last century, my tribe would not permit its women to intermarry with Creek Indians for instance. This was based on the belief that the Creeks had intermarried with Blacks when they were living back in the Southeast. We are a divided nation and at a fine level of granularity. Intermarriage will not mitigate this. Knowing your genetic history will not mitigate this. Only interracial respect will provide a solution. And the historical perspective on this is not encouraging.

    ******* Click on my moniker for Disclaimer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Again, I think that the reality is much more complex than folks on the right have comprehended. While it is true that there is a strong white supremacist/racist element among white conservatives, there is also still a significant number of white conservatives who believe in ethnic pluralism (and there are a few African and Latino Americans who are also very conservative). Likewise, the left's coalition is composed of large numbers of white, black, brown, Native, Jewish and Asian folks.

      In other words, if there is another Civil War in our future, we will once again have plenty of white folks fighting against each other! Like the war in the 19th Century, race may very well be the underlying casus belli, but it will not literally be a white folks vs folks of color war.

      Another thing that folks on the right often overlook is the fact that there are plenty of folks on the left who own guns and know how to use them. And, if we do have another Civil War, we should all remember that the liberals won the last one.

      Delete
  4. "While it is true that their is a strong white supremacist/racist element among white conservatives"

    Bullshit. You don't understand why Trump got elected. Your a mouth piece for the left.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My commentary does not reflect the fact that I'm a mouthpiece for either side. Frankly, I tend to occupy the space between the two extremes. In fact, one would have a hard time placing me on the political spectrum (a mix of what many would characterize as left/right).

      As for why Trump got elected, I would again characterize those reasons as complex. I believe he was elected because a large percentage of our population felt alienated from and abandoned by their government and the news media. I also believe that some folks were motivated by a fear of "losing their country" to secularists and immigrants. Finally, I believe that a strong dislike of Hilary Clinton motivated many people to support Trump. Those represent my views - Why do you think that Trump got elected?

      Delete
  5. "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself."

    This statement could be pondered for days.

    Political ideologies are secondary to Maslow's pyramid.

    Jonah feared that Assyrians could not change. Others feared that Germans could never be democratic. Fear about the economy becomes a selffulfilling prophecy at the stockmarket.

    Fear about black and brown people hating whites leads to mental bariers and self fulfilling prophecies of race war as people weaponize themselves.

    Anything positive??

    Yes!

    I am extremely satisfied seeing that the moment the braggard invaders of the Capitol entered the Senate everything stalled...... As if they were awaiting the orders from "their leader" for the second act. As if "they" had fulfilled their part of the deal and now "others" should take over.

    Nothing of the lies fed to the betrayed transpired. The national guard and the pentagon served the nation as usual and the evil wizzard got exposed as a liar.

    Many in the Qanon community have the spell broken that the right wing media complex exerted over them.

    They are the naked emperor. Liars and peddlars of conspiracy theories emphasizing differences and sowers of division.

    A huge chance for Biden to heal the nation.

    However if fear will be fueled by not practicing Ubuntu Biden might light the tinderbox.

    A president with a feel for real humans, their existential fears and behavior because of fear for change is absolutely necessary.

    Not a political animal, bend on pushing issues, seeking scapegoats to distract.

    People are hurting, real and perceived, they need a spunge with cool water on their foreheads from someone who cares.

    Perhaps Kamala can soothe us, embrace us all and pull our heads against her chest. Wariors are people too and all love their mother.

    Nck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nck,

      Thank you for those words of comfort and hope. After all, someone named John once said: "There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear." Let's hope that love triumphs!

      Delete
  6. Trump got elected because his White base perceives that their White Privilege in every dimension is being eroded. They were looking for a Great White Hope and they found him. (Technically, he is orange with yellow hair.)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes Neo.

    Some real, some perceived.

    Kahneman

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_aversion#:~:text=Some%20studies%20have%20suggested%20that,satisfaction%20from%20a%20%24100%20windfall.

    Nck

    ReplyDelete