Featured Post

Pledges, Oaths, and Service to the Nations of This World?

In the Hebrew Torah, pledges and oaths, along with the service which flows from them, are regarded as sacred responsibilities to God and/or ...

Sunday, November 12, 2023

UCG: Was the Biblical Sabbath Changed to Sunday?

In the latest issue of the United Church of God's Beyond Today magazine, Scott Ashley wrote an article titled Was the Biblical Sabbath Changed to Sunday? For those hoping for an updated and more historically accurate version of this story, you are going to be disappointed. In the article, Ashley writes:

"When John finished his writings late in the first century, the books and letters that would form what we call the New Testament were complete. With his passing, however, trustworthy eyewitness accounts of events and changes in the Church largely ceased. We are left with little reliable information for the next several centuries."

Unfortunately, this statement is blatantly FALSE! Consider the following list of documents available to us from the First and Second Centuries:

The Didache

Epistle of Barnabas

Epistle of Clement of Rome

The Shepherd of Hermas

Epistles of Ignatius of Antioch (To Polycarp, Smyrnaeans, Philadelphians, Romans, Trallians, Magnesians, Ephesians)

Epistle of Polycarp

Writings of Justin Martyr

Against Heresies by Irenaeus of Lyons

If you're interested in examining these primary historical sources from this period of Church history, please visit Early Christian Writings

Also, you may want to take a look at these posts by me:

Early Christianity: From Sabbath to Sunday

Christian Sunday Observance Did NOT Originate in Ancient Pagan Practice

1 comment:

  1. Hello Lonnie,
    I just read Scott Ashley's article. (Link: https://www.ucg.org/beyond-today/beyond-today-magazine/was-the-biblical-sabbath-changed-to-sunday).

    To me, the article comes across as well written and clearly informs the reader about the history of how Christianity changed from the early Christian practices of the biblical apostles to what we see today in mainstream Christianity. I agree with Scott Ashley's commentary.

    I note that you do not mention the sources that Mr. Ashley cited to support his views.

    As for the sources you cited: They are not recognized, even by mainstream Christianity, as being a part of the biblical scriptures.
    I believe that any teaching or advocation within them that runs contrary to what was taught and practiced in the early NT church, as revealed in the Bible, should be rejected.

    Dean
    Dean

    ReplyDelete