Featured Post

Pledges, Oaths, and Service to the Nations of This World?

In the Hebrew Torah, pledges and oaths, along with the service which flows from them, are regarded as sacred responsibilities to God and/or ...

Thursday, October 17, 2024

The Parable of the Talents

 The Parable of the Talents

14 “For it will be like a man going on a journey, who called his servants and entrusted to them his property. 15 To one he gave five talents, to another two, to another one, to each according to his ability. Then he went away. 16 He who had received the five talents went at once and traded with them, and he made five talents more. 17 So also he who had the two talents made two talents more. 18 But he who had received the one talent went and dug in the ground and hid his master's money. 19 Now after a long time the master of those servants came and settled accounts with them. 20 And he who had received the five talents came forward, bringing five talents more, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me five talents; here, I have made five talents more.’ 21 His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 22 And he also who had the two talents came forward, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me two talents; here, I have made two talents more.’ 23 His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 24 He also who had received the one talent came forward, saying, ‘Master, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you scattered no seed, 25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here, you have what is yours.’ 26 But his master answered him, ‘You wicked and slothful servant! You knew that I reap where I have not sown and gather where I scattered no seed? 27 Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and at my coming I should have received what was my own with interest. 28 So take the talent from him and give it to him who has the ten talents. 29 For to everyone who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance. But from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. 30 And cast the worthless servant into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’

--Matthew 25:14-30, ESV

Will You Be Ruling Over Ten Cities?

In my last post, I discussed how Herbert Armstrong confused human notions about governance and the exercise of authority with God's conception of those things. Indeed, we demonstrated that his failure to comprehend the profound differences between the two models led him to twist the meaning of the Kingdom of God! To be more precise, we made it very clear that Armstrong's emphasis on GOVERNMENT and RULERSHIP was misguided, and it twisted his understanding of what the Gospel of the Kingdom of God was all about. In this post, we will demonstrate that it also twisted his understanding of one of Christ's parables about the Kingdom (It actually twisted Armstrong's understanding of many parables, but we don't have the space or time to go through all of them here).

In the nineteenth chapter of Luke, we read:

11 The crowd was listening to everything Jesus said. And because he was nearing Jerusalem, he told them a story to correct the impression that the Kingdom of God would begin right away. 12 He said, “A nobleman was called away to a distant empire to be crowned king and then return. 13 Before he left, he called together ten of his servants and divided among them ten pounds of silver, saying, ‘Invest this for me while I am gone.’ 14 But his people hated him and sent a delegation after him to say, ‘We do not want him to be our king.’

15 “After he was crowned king, he returned and called in the servants to whom he had given the money. He wanted to find out what their profits were. 16 The first servant reported, ‘Master, I invested your money and made ten times the original amount!’

17 ‘Well done!’ the king exclaimed. ‘You are a good servant. You have been faithful with the little I entrusted to you, so you will be governor of ten cities as your reward.’

18 “The next servant reported, ‘Master, I invested your money and made five times the original amount.’

19 ‘Well done!’ the king said. ‘You will be governor over five cities.’

20 “But the third servant brought back only the original amount of money and said, ‘Master, I hid your money and kept it safe. 21 I was afraid because you are a hard man to deal with, taking what isn’t yours and harvesting crops you didn’t plant.’

22 ‘You wicked servant!’ the king roared. ‘Your own words condemn you. If you knew that I’m a hard man who takes what isn’t mine and harvests crops I didn’t plant, 23 why didn’t you deposit my money in the bank? At least I could have gotten some interest on it.’

24 “Then, turning to the others standing nearby, the king ordered, ‘Take the money from this servant, and give it to the one who has ten pounds.’

25 ‘But, master,’ they said, ‘he already has ten pounds!’

26 ‘Yes,’ the king replied, ‘and to those who use well what they are given, even more will be given. But from those who do nothing, even what little they have will be taken away. 27 And as for these enemies of mine who didn’t want me to be their king—bring them in and execute them right here in front of me.’”

In his explanation of this parable, Herbert Armstrong wrote: "Now notice in verse 17, the one who had gained ten pounds is given authority to RULE CITIES - 'have thou authority over ten cities'! To the one who had gained five pounds, he said, 'Be thou also over five cities.' This is speaking of the SECOND COMING OF CHRIST and of His delegating authority to rule to saints converted during this Christian era, between Christ's first and second appearings (sic) on earth. This parable, then, was spoken to make clear to us that the Kingdom of God is a literal GOVERNMENT, to be set up AT CHRIST'S SECOND COMING - and not before!" - Just What Do You Mean - Kingdom of God? Armstrong also observed on another occasion "Some resurrected saints will rule over ten cities, some over five (Luke 19: 17 -19)." - Tomorrow - What It Will Be Like

Unfortunately, Mr. Armstrong always had trouble interpreting symbolism because of his obsession with literalism. He seems to have forgotten what a parable is! In their article, What is a Parable? Christianity.com provides this definition of a parable: "A parable is a simple story used to illustrate a moral or spiritual lesson, as told by Jesus in the Gospels. The word "parable" comes from the Greek word 'parabolÄ“,' which means 'comparison' or 'illustration.' Parables typically employ everyday situations and characters, making them accessible to a wide audience." In the writings of Herbert Armstrong referenced in the preceding paragraph, he seemed to understand that the nobleman represented Christ, but he quickly abandons any notion of symbolic meaning and declares that this passage means that resurrect saints will be ruling over literal cities in God's Kingdom! In other words, he is making the parable conform to his understanding that the Kingdom of God is all about "GOVERNMENT."

Now, let's return to the parable itself and reread it without Mr. Armstrong's obvious bias. According to Luke, why did Jesus give this parable? Didn't he tell them this story "to correct the impression that the Kingdom of God would begin right away?" Isn't it obvious that Christ's disciples had the same obsession with a literal, human-like kingdom that Herbert Armstrong developed? Didn't Christ's disciples think in terms of Christ overthrowing Roman rule and restoring the Davidic Kingdom? In this connection, please review Acts 1:6-8. Do you think that the parable is about actual money being distributed to Christ's disciples? Is it possible that the story is pointing to the gifts of the Holy Spirit being distributed to them? Is it possible that the story is suggesting that those servants should be about the business of growing in grace and knowledge - developing the fruits of that Spirit which were entrusted to them? Is it possible that the story is suggesting that those individuals who have grown the most in love, kindness, and mercy will be the greatest in the Kingdom? Indeed, wouldn't such an interpretation be more consistent with our understanding of the definition of a parable? What do you think?

One more thing. All of this brings another passage of Scripture to mind. In the thirteenth chapter of Matthew, we read:

10 His disciples came and asked him, 'Why do you use parables when you talk to the people?'

11 He replied, 'You are permitted to understand the secrets of the Kingdom of Heaven, but others are not. 12 To those who listen to my teaching, more understanding will be given, and they will have an abundance of knowledge. But for those who are not listening, even what little understanding they have will be taken away from them. 13 That is why I use these parables, For they look, but they don’t really see. They hear, but they don’t really listen or understand.'" (Matthew 13:10-13, NLT)

Is it just me, or does that suggest anything to you about Herbert Armstrong's status as a disciple of Jesus Christ?

 

Tuesday, October 15, 2024

The Kingdom of God: A Different Kind of Authority

In his booklet Just What Do You Mean - Kingdom of God? Herbert Armstrong wrote about a prophecy delivered to the King of Babylon in the book of Daniel:

"Notice! This is speaking of KINGDOMS. It is referring to kingdoms that bear rule over the people on earth. It is speaking of GOVERNMENTS! It is not speaking of ethereal sentiments 'set up in the hearts of men.' It is not speaking of churches. It is speaking of the kind of GOVERNMENTS that bear RULE and AUTHORITY over nations of PEOPLE here on earth. It is literal. It is specific. There is no misunderstanding, here, as to what is meant by the word: KINGDOM.'"

Mr. Armstrong then proceeded to explain that the prophecy outlined "a succession of world-ruling governments." After the final government, Mr. Armstrong believed the God would set up his own government. He wrote:

"This is THE KINGDOM OF GOD. It is the END of present governments - the governments that rule Russia, China, Japan, Italy, Germany - yes, and even the United States and the British nations. They then shall become the kingdoms - the GOVERNMENTS of the Lord JESUS CHRIST, then KING of kings over the entire earth. This makes completely PLAIN the fact that the KINGDOM OF GOD is a literal GOVERNMENT. Even as the Chaldean Empire was a KINGDOM - even as the Roman Empire was a KINGDOM - so the KINGDOM OF GOD is a government. It is to take over the GOVERNMENT of the NATIONS of the world.

Jesus Christ was BORN to be a KING - a RULER!" - Just What Do You Mean - Kingdom of God?

This is where Armstrong and Jehovah's Witnesses made a critical mistake in their understanding of the Gospel. They wrongly assumed that God intended to replace all of the human kingdoms/governments of the world with his own version of THEIR kingdoms/governments. In Armstrong's interpretation, God would replace the AUTHORITY of humans by assuming the authority to rule himself! In other words, for Armstrong and his followers, the important difference was that man would be replaced at the top of the AUTHORITY pyramid by God! What they failed to understand was the fact that God's notion of authority and government was fundamentally DIFFERENT from man's conception of them!

In short, the Kingdom of God is about so much more than replacing a bunch of bad rulers with a good one! When the Jews handed Jesus over to Pilate, the Roman governor asked him if he was a king. Christ responded: "My Kingdom is not an earthly kingdom. If it were, my followers would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jewish leaders. But my Kingdom is not of this world." (John 18:36, NLT) This was apparently hard for this human ruler to understand. The Governor asked, "So, you are a king?" (John 18:37) Continuing, we read: "Jesus responded, “You say I am a king. Actually, I was born and came into the world to testify to the truth. All who love the truth recognize that what I say is true." (John 18:37, NLT) And, considering my audience, we need to make very plain that the truth which Christ was referencing was NOT the little package of doctrines which Armstrong identified as "THE TRUTH."

No, THE TRUTH which Christ spoke about concerned the real nature of HIS KINGDOM, the one which he spoke about in his parables! The one which eschewed the lust for material wealth, power, and conquest. THE KINGDOM which focuses on THE LAW of love, forgiveness, reconciliation, mercy, peace, healing, and service to others. THE KINGDOM which focuses on training the world to follow God's way by setting a good example for others to follow, NOT the human way of standing in front of a classroom and lecturing students. THE KINGDOM which has a completely different conception of AUTHORITY and its uses, NOT the human way of imposing one's will and agenda on others. THE KINGDOM which seeks the glorification of others, NOT the glorification of the ruler. THE KINGDOM without borders and without any lust for the territory or resources of others. THE KINGDOM which is focused on what's in the hearts of its subjects, NOT in the duties which they owe to the state!

What Herbert Armstrong failed to understand is that the books of Daniel and Revelation are focused on the CONTRAST between human notions about authority and governance and Divine notions of those things! Whether human governance was manifested by Egypt, Babylon, Persia, Greece, or Rome, there was a certain formula which all of them are portrayed as following. Indeed, they are all characterized by authoritarianism, selfishness, cruelty, demanding worship of the state, and militant belligerence. Moreover, they are all portrayed as being motivated by the lust for more territory, wealth, and power. For all of these human governments, their subjects were regarded as owing their complete allegiance to the state and its objectives, while the state really didn't owe them anything! The subjects were there to serve the state and its interests. In short, the exact OPPOSITE of the Divine model!

When two of Christ's disciples expressed their desire to be given the highest positions of authority in his kingdom, Jesus replied: "You know that the rulers in this world lord it over their people, and officials flaunt their authority over those under them. But among you it will be different. Whoever wants to be a leader among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first among you must become your slave. For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve others and to give his life as a ransom for many." (Matthew 20:25-28, NLT) Now, this model of "servant leadership" was obviously very foreign to even his disciples' notions about leadership. Indeed, it is apparent that they thought that they would be lording it over people in Christ's kingdom! Nevertheless, Jesus made it clear here and in many other passages that he was a different kind of king.

In the New Testament, the Greek word "basileia" is translated into English as "kingdom." In the Blue Letter Bible entry for this word (click on the Greek word), the term is defined as: royal power, kingship, dominion, rule: 1. not to be confused with an actual kingdom but rather the right or authority to rule over a kingdom, 2. of the royal power of Jesus as the triumphant Messiah, 3. of the royal power and dignity conferred on Christians in the Messiah's kingdom." In light of this definition, it is interesting to note that the Greek word "exousia" appears over and over again in the New Testament canon. Once again, Blue Letter Bible informs us that this word is translated into English as "power, authority, right." As in Christ's statement that "All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth," or as the NLT renders it "I have been given all authority in heaven and on earth." (Matthew 28:18) Likewise, we know that Jesus taught in a manner that suggested he had the "authority" to do so (Matthew 7:29, Mark 1:22). We are also informed that Christ gave his disciples the power/authority to heal and to cast out demons (Mark 3:15). We are also told that Christ had the authority/power to execute judgment and to give eternal life (John 5:27 and 17:2). Perhaps, most importantly, Christ had the power/authority to lay down his life and take it up again (John 10:18).

In short, we can see that our human notions about governance and authority are the ANTITHESIS of God's Kingdom! In other words, it isn't a matter of replacing one dictator with another - albeit a superior and more benevolent one! NO, the Kingdom of God represents an entirely different way of exercising power/authority. It is also NOT based on the aggrandizement of a person or the state. Instead, the Kingdom of God is concerned with the welfare and salvation of its subjects - of serving the people under its authority/power.  

  

Saturday, October 12, 2024

Donald Trump Is NOT in the Bible (and anyone who says so is a false prophet)!

Within both Evangelical Christian Circles and the Armstrong Churches of God, there are several folks who are saying that God is using Donald Trump to save America. Indeed, some of them say that Donald Trump's presidency was prophesied in Scripture! The pastor of the Beth Israel Worship Center, Jonathan Cahn, says that Trump is the modern equivalent of King Jehu of Israel. The pastor general of the Philadelphia Church of God claims that Trump is the modern equivalent of King Jeroboam II. Moreover, these absurd notions are even boosted by more mainstream voices like Franklin Grahm! Unfortunately, a large number of Americans now believe that Trump has been ordained by God to save America.

It is astonishing to me that a post such as this would even be necessary. In a sane world that wasn't in the grips of a partisan fever, such notions would be quickly dismissed as incredible. Even more surreal is the fact that so many Christians have so willingly swallowed this unholy alliance between secular politics and the religion which they profess to follow. It's as if God and Ceasar have become one in the eyes of many of these people! They readily twist both Scripture and history to support their notion of America as God's own - a righteous Christian nation that has been corrupted by perverts, immigrants, abortionists, globalists, and Marxists. Indeed, they have traveled so far down the rabbit hole that they are almost completely divorced from reality - rejecting any evidence which contradicts their worldview!

Nevertheless, I would be remiss not to point out the fact that the folks who hold up Donald Trump as the savior of Christian values in America are utterly WRONG! Indeed, I believe that it is blasphemous to use God and Scripture to support such foolishness. Yes, the Hebrew Bible records several instances where God used secular Gentile leaders to punish or help "His" people, Israel. However, God NEVER used any of those leaders to restore or administer the observance of Torah - NEVER! No, there are a number of instances where God used secular Gentile leaders to invade, conquer, deport, defend, and return the Israelites; but I challenge anyone to cite a single example of God using one of them to enforce or protect "His" moral code for the people of Israel (hint - Cyrus is included in this challenge).

Also, I would be remiss not to point out that the United States of America is NOT Israel! The United States is NOT the Promised Land! The government of the United States is NOT of Divine origin - it is NOT God's Kingdom. Likewise, Capitalism is NOT God's monetary system! Moreover, throughout its history as a nation, the United States of America has NEVER been a righteous nation - NEVER! European settlers stole land from Native Americans, murdered and abused them, and broke nearly every promise which they ever made to them! They also enslaved their African brethren, mistreated them, murdered them, and discriminated against them! They ruthlessly exploited the natural resources of North America and much of the rest of the world. American history is also full of corruption, assassination, and immorality of all kinds! Plain and simple, there NEVER was a golden age of righteousness in America's past.

Finally, ALL of the prophets of the Hebrew Scriptures (Moses, Nathan, Elijah, Elisha, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Amos, Zechariah, etc.) were given messages FOR THE PEOPLE OF ISRAEL! Moreover, Jesus Christ said that HE was the fulfillment of Torah, the prophets, and the Psalms! Indeed, when those Scriptures were originally written, the United States of America wasn't even a glimmer in anyone's mind! Finally, Jehu usurped the throne of Israel, murdered the former royal family (and a king of Judah), and was evaluated as someone who "was not careful to walk in the law of the Lord, the God of Israel, with all his heart. He did not turn from the sins of Jeroboam, which he made Israel to sin." (II Kings 10:31) As for Jeroboam II, we read that "he did what was evil in the sight of the Lord. He did not depart from all the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, which he made Israel to sin." (II Kings 14:24) Indeed, the prophet Amos predicted a violent end for Jeroboam and the subjugation of his people (Amos 7). In other words, these were NOT good kings (they did NOT restore or enforce God's morality).

Hence, we have seen that placing Donald Trump in the role of God's anointed is absurd! It is a delusion, pure and simple! We are all free to vote the dictates of our own conscience, but please don't try to justify yourself as supporting God's anointed candidate - that's just plain old hogwash!  


Friday, October 11, 2024

Have You Ever Read Christ's Feast of Tabernacles Messages?

Every year, the Armstrong Churches of God designate various festival sites for their members to gather and observe the Feast of Tabernacles outlined in the Law of Moses. During their celebrations, there will be a large number of sermons delivered about the Kingdom of God coming to this earth. Indeed, for most of them, this festival celebrates the Millennial rule of Christ and his saints - a time of peace, happiness, and abundance. But is this really what this festival pictures? Is this what the festival symbolizes? OR Was this meaning imposed on the festival to fit Herbert Armstrong's interpretation of God's plan?

In previous posts, I have written about the fact that Torah's instructions for this festival had the Israelites construct temporary shelters around the Tabernacle or Temple to celebrate this festival. In some of those posts, I have also pointed out that Jesus Christ came to this earth to temporarily tabernacle in the flesh. Moreover, we should also note that Scripture alludes to the fact that humans currently inhabit a temporary dwelling, which we must someday leave behind for a more permanent home. Now, obviously, these things fit very well with the notion of a "Festival of Temporary Dwellings."

Even so, the Gospel of John records that Jesus observed this festival once upon a time in Jerusalem, and that he delivered two messages during his celebration of it. Now, I may be out in left field with this, but don't you think we should all be just a little bit interested in what he had to say on that occasion? For instance, did he talk about the Millenium? Did he discuss government? In short, what did Jesus talk about during the festival? Let's take a look!

John 7:16 So Jesus told them, “My message is not my own; it comes from God who sent me. 17 Anyone who wants to do the will of God will know whether my teaching is from God or is merely my own. 18 Those who speak for themselves want glory only for themselves, but a person who seeks to honor the one who sent him speaks truth, not lies. 19 Moses gave you the law, but none of you obeys it! In fact, you are trying to kill me.”

20 The crowd replied, “You’re demon possessed! Who’s trying to kill you?”

21 Jesus replied, “I did one miracle on the Sabbath, and you were amazed. 22 But you work on the Sabbath, too, when you obey Moses’ law of circumcision. (Actually, this tradition of circumcision began with the patriarchs, long before the law of Moses.) 23 For if the correct time for circumcising your son falls on the Sabbath, you go ahead and do it so as not to break the law of Moses. So why should you be angry with me for healing a man on the Sabbath? 24 Look beneath the surface so you can judge correctly.”

Now, that's interesting! He talked about the pitfalls of legalism!

37 On the last day, the climax of the festival, Jesus stood and shouted to the crowds, “Anyone who is thirsty may come to me! 38 Anyone who believes in me may come and drink! For the Scriptures declare, ‘Rivers of living water will flow from his heart.’” 39 (When he said “living water,” he was speaking of the Spirit, who would be given to everyone believing in him. But the Spirit had not yet been given, because Jesus had not yet entered into his glory.)

New Living Translation

This is what Christ chose to talk about during his only recorded observance of this festival. Again, maybe it's just me, but don't you think that this might have some application to the meaning of these days?

Monday, October 7, 2024

Satan Is NOT All That!

Herbert Armstrong portrayed Satan as a powerful and indestructible spirit being who ruled over this earth with his demons and had the ability to deceive and destroy. To support his narrative about Satan he quoted prooftexts from Isaiah, Ezekiel, Ephesians, and Revelation. Likewise, he often described the temptation of Christ as a "titanic" battle between good and evil. In short, for Mr. Armstrong, Satan was a powerful adversary bent on destroying humanity, and that there was very little that we puny humans could do to resist or defeat him.

Fortunately, however, Mr. Armstrong's narrative about Satan was/is NOT consistent with what is revealed in Scripture. Indeed, from the very first mention of this being in Scripture, his subjection to God is underscored, and his defeat is prophesied! The story of the fall of Adam and Eve is well-known to all of us. When God confronted the couple for eating from the tree which he had forbidden them to eat from, we are informed that the woman said that the serpent had deceived her (Genesis 3:13). Next, we read that God told the serpent: "Because you have done this, cursed are you above all livestock and above all beasts of the field; on your belly you shall go, and dust you shall eat all the days of your life. I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel." (Genesis 3:14-15, ESV) Notice, that God has the authority to curse the serpent and to predict that a descendant of the woman would "bruise your head" (indicative of a fatal injury), and that the serpent would only "bruise his heel."

In the next mention of Satan in Scripture, we read: "Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them. The Lord said to Satan, 'From where have you come?' Satan answered the Lord and said, 'From going to and fro on the earth, and from walking up and down on it.' And the Lord said to Satan, 'Have you considered my servant Job, that there is none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, who fears God and turns away from evil?' Then Satan answered the Lord and said, 'Does Job fear God for no reason? Have you not put a hedge around him and his house and all that he has, on every side? You have blessed the work of his hands, and his possessions have increased in the land. But stretch out your hand and touch all that he has, and he will curse you to your face.' And the Lord said to Satan, 'Behold, all that he has is in your hand. Only against him do not stretch out your hand.' So Satan went out from the presence of the Lord." (Job 1:6-12, ESV) Once again, we see that Satan is subject to God - that he presented himself to God along with the rest of the angelic host. Notice too, that he could only do what God ALLOWED him to do, nothing more!

Then, after Satan had removed Job's wealth and caused the death of his children, we read: "Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them to present himself before the Lord. And the Lord said to Satan, 'From where have you come?' Satan answered the Lord and said, 'From going to and fro on the earth, and from walking up and down on it.' And the Lord said to Satan, 'Have you considered my servant Job, that there is none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, who fears God and turns away from evil? He still holds fast his integrity, although you incited me against him to destroy him without reason.' Then Satan answered the Lord and said, 'Skin for skin! All that a man has he will give for his life. But stretch out your hand and touch his bone and his flesh, and he will curse you to your face.' And the Lord said to Satan, 'Behold, he is in your hand; only spare his life.'" (Job 2:1-6, ESV) Yet again, Satan was only allowed to do certain things by God. In other words, God was in control! Indeed, there is a strong sense here that God is using Satan for his own purposes - to effect a positive change in Job's life!

Likewise, in the book of Zechariah, we read: "Then he showed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of the Lord, and Satan standing at his right hand to accuse him. And the Lord said to Satan, 'The Lord rebuke you, O Satan! The Lord who has chosen Jerusalem rebuke you! Is not this a brand plucked from the fire?' Now Joshua was standing before the angel, clothed with filthy garments. And the angel said to those who were standing before him, 'Remove the filthy garments from him.' And to him he said, 'Behold, I have taken your iniquity away from you, and I will clothe you with pure vestments.' And I said, 'Let them put a clean turban on his head.' So they put a clean turban on his head and clothed him with garments. And the angel of the Lord was standing by." (Zechariah 3:1-5, ESV) Once again, Satan is portrayed as the accuser, but the Lord was clearly in charge of the situation. This Jehoshua (Hebrew: YHWH is salvation), acting as High Priest, was clearly a type of the Jehoshua (Jesus) who was to appear later for the saving of humankind, and Satan was REBUKED (his accusation was rejected)!

Now, before leaving the Old Testament, we should also take a closer look at those passages from Isaiah and Ezekiel that Herbert Armstrong liked to cite as prooftexts for his portrayal of Satan. In that passage from Isaiah, the King of Babylon was represented as Satan. We read there: "How the oppressor has ceased, the insolent fury ceased! The Lord has broken the staff of the wicked, the scepter of rulers, that struck the peoples in wrath with unceasing blows, that ruled the nations in anger with unrelenting persecution. The whole earth is at rest and quiet; they break forth into singing. The cypresses rejoice at you, the cedars of Lebanon, saying, ‘Since you were laid low, no woodcutter comes up against us.’ Sheol beneath is stirred up to meet you when you come; it rouses the shades to greet you, all who were leaders of the earth; it raises from their thrones all who were kings of the nations. All of them will answer and say to you: ‘You too have become as weak as we! You have become like us!’ Your pomp is brought down to Sheol, the sound of your harps; maggots are laid as a bed beneath you, and worms are your covers. How you are fallen from heaven, O Day Star, son of Dawn! How you are cut down to the ground, you who laid the nations low! You said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heaven; above the stars of God I will set my throne on high; I will sit on the mount of assembly in the far reaches of the north; I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.’ But you are brought down to Sheol, to the far reaches of the pit." (Isaiah 14:4-15, ESV)

After leaving Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God, the first thing that struck me about this passage was the fact that he had only used part of the passage. There are clear references within this passage to the DEATH of the person/entity being discussed. This, however, did NOT fit with Armstrong's narrative about an indestructible, immortal Satan! His solution to this glaring contradiction? Those parts of the passage only apply to the human king of Babylon! NO, sorry Mr. Armstrong, this passage clearly speaks of the ultimate and utter defeat and END of Satan! Moreover, it makes sense that the God who created this being would be able to destroy him. After all, we read in Scripture that only God has immortality (I Timothy 6:16)! Now, from what is revealed elsewhere in Scripture, it appears that angels have the ability to exist indefinitely. Even so, as created beings, they exist at the pleasure of their Creator!

In similar fashion, that passage from the book of Ezekiel reveals much more than Herbert Armstrong was willing to admit. After talking at some length about the "Prince of Tyre," the narrative changes to a discussion about the "King of Tyre" (Ezekiel 28:1-12). We read there: "You were the signet of perfection, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty. You were in Eden, the garden of God; every precious stone was your covering, sardius, topaz, and diamond, beryl, onyx, and jasper, sapphire, emerald, and carbuncle; and crafted in gold were your settings and your engravings. On the day that you were created they were prepared. You were an anointed guardian cherub. I placed you; you were on the holy mountain of God; in the midst of the stones of fire you walked. You were blameless in your ways from the day you were created, till unrighteousness was found in you. In the abundance of your trade you were filled with violence in your midst, and you sinned; so I cast you as a profane thing from the mountain of God, and I destroyed you, O guardian cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. Your heart was proud because of your beauty; you corrupted your wisdom for the sake of your splendor. I cast you to the ground; I exposed you before kings, to feast their eyes on you. By the multitude of your iniquities, in the unrighteousness of your trade you profaned your sanctuaries; so I brought fire out from your midst; it consumed you, and I turned you to ashes on the earth in the sight of all who saw you. All who know you among the peoples are appalled at you; you have come to a dreadful end and shall be no more forever." (Ezekiel 28:12-19, ESV) Now, that is plain language about Satan's fate! Moreover, as we will shortly demonstrate, it is entirely consistent with what is revealed on that subject in the New Testament!

In the New Testament, the temptation of Jesus Christ by Satan the Devil is mentioned in three of the Gospel narratives (Matthew 4:1-11, Mark 1:12-13, and Luke 4:1-13). Simply put, Jesus successfully rebutted three temptations put forward by Satan, and then commanded him to leave! Interestingly, both Jesus and Satan cited Scripture in their conversation with each other. Of course, Satan was twisting/perverting the text, and Christ was using it to refute Satan! Nevertheless, after reading these narratives, we have the clear sense that Satan gave it his best shot, and Christ didn't even flinch! In other words, Christ clearly defeated Satan.

Moreover, all four of the Gospel narratives portray Christ and his disciples as having complete authority over Satan's demonic kingdom. We find them casting out demons from possessed and afflicted people on numerous occasions in those writings. Indeed, at one point, after having been sent out to preach Christ's message, we read: "The seventy-two returned with joy, saying, 'Lord, even the demons are subject to us in your name!' And he said to them, 'I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven. Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall hurt you. Nevertheless, do not rejoice in this, that the spirits are subject to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven." (Luke 10:17-20, ESV) Clearly, Christ was portrayed here and elsewhere as having full authority over Satan and his demons.

On another occasion, Christ was accused of casting out demons because Satan had granted him that authority (Luke 11:14-15). Christ, however, quickly pointed out just how absurd such a notion was. He said: "Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and a divided household falls. And if Satan also is divided against himself, how will his kingdom stand? For you say that I cast out demons by Beelzebul. And if I cast out demons by Beelzebul, by whom do your sons cast them out? Therefore, they will be your judges. But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you. When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own palace, his goods are safe; but when one stronger than he attacks him and overcomes him, he takes away his armor in which he trusted and divides his spoil." (Luke 11:17-22, ESV) In other words, God and Christ were clearly stronger entities than Satan! Satan and his minions were in subjection to them, NOT the other way around!

On another occasion, after reprimanding the Jews for NOT following the example of obedience to God that Abraham had set for them, Jesus said: "If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and I am here. I came not of my own accord, but he sent me. Why do you not understand what I say? It is because you cannot bear to hear my word. You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies." (John 8:42-44, ESV) He was reminding them that Satan is a liar - that he had lied to their ancestors, Adam and Eve. Satan's only power was to lie and deceive and to cause hurt and harm. Indeed, later, in that same Gospel account, we are told that Satan influenced one of Christ's disciples to betray him (John 13:27, ESV)!

Now, from the other writings that make up the New Testament, it is also clear that Christ's apostles had the same perspective on Satan. We read in the book of Acts that Peter believed that Satan had inspired Ananias and his wife to lie about their contribution to the Church (Acts 5:3). And, just as in the story of Job, it appears that Paul felt that Satan was a tool that could be used to procure a positive spiritual outcome (I Corinthians 5:5). Even so, it is also clear that Paul understood Satan's power to deceive (I Corinthians 7:5, II Corinthians 2:11, 4:4, 11:14, Ephesians 2:2, II Thessalonians 2:9). In his own epistle, Peter warned Christians to "Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour..." (I Peter 5:8, ESV). Even so, he went on to reassure his audience that they would have the ultimate victory through Christ (I Peter 5:9-11).

Now, fortunately for us, someone in the First Century decided to write down some very important things about the Chistian perspective on the Hebrew Bible. For our purposes, the most important things revealed in that book have to do with the Angelic realm, and what Christ accomplished for us relative to Satan the Devil. In the first chapter of that epistle, it is revealed that Christ fulfills a role in God's plans that is vastly superior to the one played by angels. Indeed, their part is summed up nicely in the final verse of the chapter. Speaking about angels, we read: "Are they not all ministering spirits sent out to serve for the sake of those who are to inherit salvation?" (Hebrews 1:14, ESV)

Contrary to Mr. Armstrong's teachings in The Incredible Human Potential and Mystery of the Ages, in the second chapter of this epistle, we read: "For it was not to angels that God subjected the world to come, of which we are speaking." (Hebrews 2:5, ESV) The author goes on to reveal that humankind was tagged by God to inherit that "world to come" (Hebrews 2:6-10, ESV). Then, finally, we come to the critical passage: "Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same things, that through death he might DESTROY the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil, and deliver all those who through fear of death were subject to lifelong slavery." (Hebrews 2:14-15, ESV) Did you catch that? Christ shared in our flesh and blood to redeem us from the penalty for sin, death! Moreover, it is made very clear that he intended to accomplish that by destroying the one whose deception had prompted so many of us to sin!

Then, in chapters eight, nine and ten of this epistle, the anonymous author compares the High Priest of the Old Covenant with Jesus Christ as the High Priest of the New Covenant. For us, the critical part of this narrative is found in the ninth-and tenth-chapter's depiction of the symbolism surrounding the Day of Atonement. In this passage, we learn that the High Priest of the Old Covenant needed props in the form of some animal sacrifices and two goats. Unlike Christ, the human priest could not supply his own blood for the sins of the people, and he could not carry the peoples sins away from the camp. Moreover, rather than performing this ritual once each year, we are told that Christ permanently fulfilled its symbolism. We read: "For Christ has entered, not into holy places made with hands, which are copies of the true things, but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God on our behalf. Nor was it to offer himself repeatedly, as the high priest enters the holy places every year with blood not his own, for then he would have had to suffer repeatedly since the foundation of the world. But as it is, he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment, so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him." (Hebrews 9:24-28, ESV)

Continuing the thought, in the next chapter, we read: "For since the law has but a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true form of these realities, it can never, by the same sacrifices that are continually offered every year, make perfect those who draw near. Otherwise, would they not have ceased to be offered, since the worshipers, having once been cleansed, would no longer have any consciousness of sins? But in these sacrifices, there is a reminder of sins every year. For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins." (Hebrews 10:1-4, ESV) The thought concluded with this: "And every priest stands daily at his service, offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. But when Christ had offered for all time a single sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God, waiting from that time until his enemies should be made a footstool for his feet. For by a single offering, he has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified." (Hebrews 10:11-14, ESV)

Unfortunately, in this instance, Herbert Armstrong ignored his own axiom to let the Bible interpret itself. Mr. Armstrong taught that the second goat, the goat of removal, represented Satan the Devil! Ignoring this passage, and all of the other Scriptures pertinent to understanding the symbolism of the ceremony outlined in Leviticus 16, Herbert believed that Satan was ultimately responsible for ALL of the sins that had ever been committed, and that it was consequently just to place all of those sins back on his head.

Of course, he wouldn't have believed that if he'd employed a passage from Ezekiel in his understanding of this ritual. We read there: "The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father, nor the father suffer for the iniquity of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself." (Ezekiel 18:20, ESV) In other words, "the devil made me do it" isn't going to cut it on judgment day! In short, we should all understand that God laid all of our iniquity on Jesus Christ (Isaiah 53:6), and that he was the ONE designated to take away the sins of the world (John 1:29).

Interestingly, it is the book of Revelation that ties the scriptural narrative about Satan the Devil together (Genesis-Revelation). Indeed, in the twelfth chapter of that book, we find a historical narrative that outlines Satan's role in deceiving humankind and in trying to thwart God's plans. It's there that we find one of Mr. Armstrong's favorite passages: "And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world—he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him." (Revelation 12:9, ESV) Also, consistent with what is revealed about him in the Old Testament, we read in this chapter that Satan is the one who accuses Christians (Revelation 12:10). Notice too, that Christians are said to have conquered this entity through the blood of Christ (Revelation 12:11). Then, we read: "But woe to you, O earth and sea, for the devil has come down to you in great wrath, because he knows that his time is short!" (Revelation 12:12, ESV)

The following chapters outline Satan's role in inspiring and supporting the "Beast" and "Babylon" which are symbolic of human governance of this earth. Then, finally, in the twentieth chapter of this book, we come to the END of Satan's story (Revelation 20:1-10). Notice too, that his fate is NOT to have our sins placed on his head and to wander in the wilderness! Initially, he is bound with a "chain" and imprisoned in a "bottomless pit" (Revelation 20:1-3). Finally, when the thousand-year reign of Christ and his saints is finished, we are told that the Devil is released for a brief period and is, once again, allowed to deceive humanity (Revelation 20:7-8).

Satan's ultimate fate? We read that: "the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur" (Revelation 20:10) Remember too, that Christ had said that this everlasting fire had been prepared for the Devil and his angels (Matthew 25:41). Moreover, a little later, in this same passage from Revelation, we read: "Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire." (Revelation 20:13, ESV) I don't know about you, but that sure sounds eternal and final to me!

Hence, we see that Christ has already gained the victory over Satan and the death which he introduced into the world. Satan's doom is a forgone conclusion. Throughout history, he has only been permitted to do those things which God has allowed him to do. Moreover, it is apparent that God has used Satan to further his own plans to save humanity and give us eternal life with him! In other words, Satan is clearly NOT all that! 

  


 

Saturday, October 5, 2024

Why Would I Bother to Listen or Respond to Anything That Pervert Has to Say?

I've often asked myself that question in looking back at my dalliance with the teachings of Herbert Armstrong. More recently, however, I have found myself at the receiving end of this question from some of the supporters and former supporters of Armstrong's teachings. Of course, the perversity of the question itself is not lost on me when one considers the fact that Herbie was guilty of incest, sought sex therapy, and divorced his second wife. Nevertheless, the fact that I am a Christian who also happens to be a homosexual leads some folks to ignore or dismiss anything I have to say on the subject of religion.

First, for someone who has been writing this blog for over ten years with an average of one hundred and fifty views on any given day (OK, sometimes it's five hundred to a thousand, but that's rare), it is ridiculous to even suggest that I care about going viral or am lusting after popularity. Simply stated, as someone whose own spiritual journey has been fraught with deception and abuse, I have felt like I might have something to say that would help someone else on their own spiritual journey. Indeed, I have often found myself extremely gratified by a single private comment in response to one of my posts. After all, I am acutely aware of the fact that I don't have all of the answers, and that I haven't received a Divine commission to save the world.

Nevertheless, I have been very conscientious about trying to make a positive contribution to my faith, family, friends, community, and the world around me. There was a time when I would have added country to that list, but anyone who is familiar with my posts is aware that that impulse has faded over the years. At any rate, in order to be a credible voice, I have made an extraordinary effort to be honest and believable. Toward that end, although it isn't anyone's business, I have lived a celibate life for the last two decades. In other words, I have NOT taken advantage of the freedom which I believe that I have in Jesus Christ. I live my life in accordance with the more traditional notions of Christianity related to human sexuality. I have done so in order to immunize myself against the charge of acting and teaching in my own self-interest. Stated yet another way, I cannot be charged with hypocrisy if I'm living according to the dictates of the consciences of potential critics! To be blunter, there is NO "homosexual behavior" happening in my own life.

Even so, some of the folks who have accepted the words of an incestuous pedophile (Herbie) and/or the words of a lying, adulterous, egocentric bully (Donald Trump) are quick to dismiss or ignore what little old me has to say! It reminds me of something that Paul warned Timothy about so many years ago. He wrote: "For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching but having itching ears, they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions (II Timothy 4:3, ESV)." Oh well, if someone ignores or dismisses something out-of-hand, life is a lot easier - they don't have to actually answer or refute any challenges to their belief system! Yes, I completely understand. My thanks to those among you who have eyes to see and ears to hear and aren't afraid to entertain ideas which contradict your own beliefs.