Featured Post

Pledges, Oaths, and Service to the Nations of This World?

In the Hebrew Torah, pledges and oaths, along with the service which flows from them, are regarded as sacred responsibilities to God and/or ...

Tuesday, June 23, 2020

God-ordained OR Man-made?

Unfortunately, many of us have attributed things to God that humans have fashioned on their own. In other words, humans like to put words in God's mouth! We like to imagine that God sees things the way that we see things, or that God has inspired or caused us to think a certain way. In similar fashion, many of us like to take ancient cultural/societal norms recorded in Scripture and make them into universal principles that apply to all people and all times.

Take a moment to consider just a few of the things that many of us take for granted as being God-ordained: patriarchy (male led society), marriage, divorce, gender roles, paternalism, capitalism, heterosexual orientation, worship, parenting techniques, etc. But how much of the stuff that we associate with each of the things mentioned actually originated in the mind of God?

Is God actually a male? Does God have a penis? Weren't both genders (male and female) created in God's image? Doesn't the New Testament state that gender is irrelevant under the terms of the New Covenant? Was God the source of female silence in the Christian Church or was it Paul (and the Jewish traditions from which he came)?

Many Christians are surprised to learn that there is NO formula for a marriage ceremony given anywhere in Scripture! Marriage licenses are creations of the state. Likewise, the notion of a minister, judge or some other official performing the ceremony is a man-made tradition. Is jumping over a broom an acceptable marriage ceremony to God? Oh sure, the Bible does speak of marriage in the generic sense, but it also mentions concepts like polygamy and concubine marriages that most modern Christians have rejected.

What about divorce? The concept is mentioned in Scripture, but which of the formulas presented in those pages (Moses, Christ or Paul) reflects God's thinking on the subject? And, once again, does the state have any legitimate role in the process?

As for gender roles, does God define for us what is masculine and what is feminine? Does God really care if a woman wears pants or dresses? Likewise, does God really care about the length of a man's hair? Did God ordain that boys like trucks and girls like dolls? Did God ordain that men like football and women like nail salons?

Did God ordain that some men/nations should dominate and exploit their weaker neighbors? Did capitalism originate in the mind of God? Did socialism originate in the mind of Satan? Do either one of these man-made systems actually reflect God's thinking on the subject?

If a heterosexual attraction is the God-ordained formula, then why are so many folks attracted to members of their own gender? Is sexual orientation God-ordained? If it is something we choose, then why doesn't everyone go with their natural inclination - the path of least resistance?

As for worship, the only place in Scripture that attempts to define a God-ordained service is found in the Old Testament Pentateuch. There is no formula to be found in the entire New Testament for a Christian worship service! The pulpits, pews, stained-glass windows, hymns, pianos, guitars, sermons and sermonettes common in today's Christian worship services are all human notions of what that service should look like!

As for parenting techniques, how much of what we know about parenting has been derived from human trial and error over the centuries? Do we really believe that God has mandated corporal punishment for all children? Do we really believe that children have no rights? Do we believe that children who smart off to their parents should be stoned?

How can we tell whether something is man-made or God-ordained? While God may not have given us a marriage ceremony or a clear standard for divorce, we do have the principle laid down in Scripture that we must not be unfaithful to each other. While male and female clothing standards and hair styles have varied greatly among different cultures, Scripture extols the virtue of modesty. Moreover, Scripture makes plain that Christ taught that we should all treat others the way that we would like to be treated - with kindness, mercy and compassion. And, while the format of the worship service may not be important, Scripture teaches us that God must be loved, honored and respected above every other person, place or thing.

Do we begin to see that there is a profound difference between cultural norms and eternal/universal spiritual principles? Of course, the Fundamentalist Christian believes that Paul's statements about clothing, women and homosexuality also reflect God's will. Most of them believe that God actually wrote these epistles, not Paul. Likewise, they believe that God wrote the Pentateuch, not Moses. For them, the human authors of Scripture were magically immune from being influenced by their own culture/society, prejudices and feelings. For them, inspiration means Divine dictation - that the human authors were only acting in the capacity of scribes. For them everything that was penned by these humans IS the "word of God." For me, however, the likelihood that any human could be completely immune to any influence by their own experiences and circumstances stretches credibility. What about you? Are we following God-ordained rituals or man-made traditions?   

5 comments:

  1. Thanks. I have asked the same question many times. Roy

    ReplyDelete
  2. On the eighth day, God created the Remington Acton Bolt rifle, so man could kill the dinosaurs and the homo sjechuals.

    Nck

    (kidding.... Cant remember the movie the little Okies said this)

    Nck

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was reading your article carefully to make some wise, serious comments.

    Then it occurred to me that your article seems to emphasize the point that modern Christians have rejected the bible for reasons that are not obvious.

    There are serious benefits to having slaves, concubines, jump the broom weddings, instead of lavish expensive ones.

    I'm confused right now.

    You are opening the lid of a can of worms into rational humanistic questions, like when God would visit the earth with thunder and lightning and the first taxi driver he meets asks about "the missus." If there is none, we might just expect transgenders to be the exact image of a single deity.

    But really.
    If the ancients were so stupid and bigotted, what then would require humans to be so much evolved that their projection of God would indeed be a reasonable estimate?

    Quantummechanical, AI society?

    Will Elon Musk be regarded a prophet one day?

    Nck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. nck,
      I always appreciate your comments, and they always reflect the fact that the gears are turning! As you know, I prefer to provoke thought rather than convince folks that I'm right. I'm asking questions too!
      As for this post, it speaks to the wider objective of this blog - to promote a less narrow, a more expansive, view of God. I believe the Fundamentalist/Literalist view of Scripture does a great disservice to the Bible in particular and Christianity in general. Not only are their claims about Scripture inconsistent with what those writings have to offer about themselves, they also cause many educated and critical thinking individuals to reject/dismiss them as superstitious relics of the past.
      I believe the Bible has much to offer modern humans. I see many eternal/universal spiritual principles revealed in those pages, but their value and truth is diluted when folks confuse cultural/societal/time specific traditions with them.
      I believe that the musings of the ancients about the Divine contain much wisdom, common sense and truth; but we should also acknowledge that they also contain some ignorance, prejudice and error. And, if we truly have the Holy Spirit, we should be able to discern the difference (because the Holy Spirit guides and helps us - it doesn't control us or make us infallible).

      Delete
    2. I see.

      Just the other day I heard a sculptor in Antakya (Antioch of old) say.

      Those claiming their religion as the one true faith are projecting a bland one colored mosaic.

      A mosaic of many colors can be a magnificent splendor.

      He was speaking about religion of course, but isn't a religion mostly defined just by ones view or definition of the deity(ies), or corps universal principle, at the heart of that particular religion?

      Nck

      Delete