Central to the teachings of Herbert Armstrong and his followers is the notion that the teachings of “Traditional Christianity” bear little or no resemblance to the teachings of Jesus Christ. In fact, in what many consider to be one of his most important books Tomorrow…What It Will Be Like, Mr. Armstrong wrote: “Reluctant though we are to recognize it, we find the established religious organizations which profess the name of Jesus Christ teaching the diametric opposite of His teachings-condemning the customs He practiced - following, instead, the pagan customs He condemned!” (page 21)
But what
about Herbie’s teachings? How do Herbert Armstrong’s teachings compare to those
of Jesus Christ?
Herbert
Armstrong’s Worldwide Church of God taught and practiced a hierarchical form of
church government. In a memorial edition of the The Good News
magazine which appeared shortly after the founder’s death, “The basic doctrine”
was summarized: “God's government in His Church is a theocracy, with Christ at
the helm and God's chosen ministers fulfilling responsibilities under Christ in
the form of a pyramidal hierarchy. It is a government of faith, in which
the leaders submit their wills to Christ and the members trust God to
administer His Church through those leaders.” (page 28, May 1986 edition, Government
in God’s Church)
Jesus
Christ, however, taught that his followers should follow a model of government
based on service to others. He taught: Ye know that the princes of the
Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise
authority upon them. But it shall not be so among you: but
whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister; And
whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant: Even
as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give
his life a ransom for many.” (Matthew 20:25-28)
Herbert
Armstrong’s Worldwide Church of God taught and practiced the disfellowshipping
of erring members. In the Pastor General’s Report of 12 June
1981, Robert Fahey clarified Mr. Armstrong’s position on the excommunication of
problem members. He wrote: “Those who sow discord, cause division, speak evil
of Church leadership, are contentious, or in any way try to pull God's people
away from His Church, should be disfellowshipped. These are the ones we
need to protect the flock from regardless of previous status. They may have to
be publicly marked. They want us to be - of them--out of God's Church!” (page
1)
Jesus
Christ, however, taught the religious leaders of his day that a good shepherd
seeks that which has strayed away. He said: “What man of you, having an
hundred sheep, if he lose one of them, doth not leave the ninety and nine in
the wilderness, and go after that which is lost, until he find it? And when he hath found it, he layeth
it on his shoulders, rejoicing. And when he cometh home,
he calleth together his friends and neighbours, saying unto them, Rejoice with
me; for I have found my sheep which was lost. I say unto
you, that likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more
than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance.” (Luke
15:4-7) He also taught his disciples the “Parable of the Tares.” Christ said: “The
kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field: But while men slept, his enemy came
and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way. But
when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares
also. So the servants of the householder came and said
unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath
it tares? He said unto them, An enemy hath done this.
The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up? But
he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat
with them. Let both grow together until the harvest: and in
the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the
tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my
barn.” (Matthew 13:24-30)
The
Worldwide Church of God taught that everyone should tithe (give ten percent of
one’s income) to the Church, and that this ensured complete equality (rich or
poor) in what each individual contributed to the church. In the January 1982
edition of The Plain Truth magazine, an article entitled “There
Is A Better Way” by Clayton Steep touted the equity of the tithing system. He
wrote: “everyone would pay taxes at the same rate-l0 percent. Everyone would
be in the same bracket. Those who have enough initiative and resourcefulness to
become ' prosperous would not be penalized for their industriousness. (God
doesn't penalize the prosperous tither. But humans do penalize those who
honestly prosper.) No matter how much money a family made, they would still owe
only 10 percent.” (page 16)
In the
Gospel of Mark, however, we learn that Jesus had a different perspective on
giving. We read there that: “Jesus sat over against the treasury, and
beheld how the people cast money into the treasury: and many that were rich
cast in much. And there came a certain poor widow,
and she threw in two mites, which make a farthing. And
he called unto him his disciples, and saith unto them, Verily I say unto you,
That this poor widow hath cast more in, than all they which have cast into
the treasury: For all they did cast in of their
abundance; but she of her want did cast in all that she had, even all her
living.” (Mark 12:41-44)
The
Worldwide Church of God taught that God’s TRUE Church could be positively
identified by finding the one that taught the correct doctrines. In their booklet Where Is God’s True Church Today?, Brian Knowles stated:
“The Church of God, then, must be a Sabbath-keeping Church with the correct
name. It must keep all ten of the Ten Commandments and live by every word of
God - not rejecting part of the Bible. It is God's Church because it
collectively possesses the Holy Spirit. It preaches the true gospel of the
coming government of God, bearing the good fruit of the Holy Spirit.” In other
words, the identification of God’s Church was based on its understanding
of certain doctrinal “truths.”
Jesus Christ
taught that his true disciples/followers could be easily identified by the
possession of one trait. He told his disciples: “A new commandment I
give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love
one another. By this shall all men know that ye
are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.” (John 13:34-35) Now, I ask: Does
lording it over the membership, disfellowshipping those who step out of line,
failing to appreciate real sacrifice in giving and demanding an understanding
of certain “truths” sound like a proper demonstration of love for one another
to you?
Who was/is
teaching the diametric opposite of what Christ taught? When we compare
just a few of Armstrong’s teachings to those of Jesus Christ, we are forced to reach
the conclusion that Herbert Armstrong was engaged in a little bit of “the pot
calling the kettle black.”
**All of the
writings of the Worldwide Church referenced in this post can be found at The Herbert W Armstrong Searchable Library
One individual responded to my contention that disfellowshipping is contrary to the teachings of Christ by pointing out what Paul told the Corinthians to do with the man who was having an inappropriate relationship with his stepmother. From a Fundamentalist perspective, Paul's actions in this matter have to be reconciled with the clear teachings of Christ quoted in my post (the Bible can't contradict itself). In this connection, I would point out that Paul insisted on disciplining this man because of a personal MORAL failure, not over the rejection of some doctrine(s) or because he was sowing discord within the Church. Moreover, Paul eventually instructed the Corinthians to readmit the man to their fellowship lest he be "swallowed up with overmuch sorrow." Moreover, Paul's instruction to the Romans to "mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them" was never intended as a blueprint for excommunicating anyone. The Greek makes plain that Paul intended for the Romans to "take note of" such people, not stand up in church and publicly condemn them. Moreover, this scripture clearly puts the onus on church members to "avoid" such a person in their midst, not physically remove him/her from their midst.
ReplyDeleteI remember as a teen being flabbergasted when I learned that Luther never intended to be not Catholic.
DeleteNck