Thursday, October 31, 2024

Samhain and Halloween

The Armstrong Churches of God and Jehovah's Witnesses claim that Halloween is pagan in origin and should NOT be observed by "true" Christians. Is that true? Does our Halloween have its origins in the pagan Celtic festival of Samhain (pronounced "sow-win")? AND Should Christians shun anything to do with the observance of that holiday? This post will attempt to answer those questions.

In support of their stance against "pagan" holidays, the favorite prooftext of the Armstrong Churches of God is found in the book of Deuteronomy. We read there: "These are the statutes and rules that you shall be careful to do in the land that the Lord, the God of your fathers, has given you to possess, all the days that you live on the earth. You shall surely destroy all the places where the nations whom you shall dispossess served their gods, on the high mountains and on the hills and under every green tree. You shall tear down their altars and dash in pieces their pillars and burn their Asherim with fire. You shall chop down the carved images of their gods and destroy their name out of that place. You shall not worship the Lord your God in that way." (Deuteronomy 12:1-4, ESV) Moreover, a little later in the same book and chapter, we read: "When the Lord your God cuts off before you the nations whom you go in to dispossess, and you dispossess them and dwell in their land, take care that you be not ensnared to follow them, after they have been destroyed before you, and that you do not inquire about their gods, saying, ‘How did these nations serve their gods?—that I also may do the same.’ You shall not worship the Lord your God in that way, for every abominable thing that the Lord hates they have done for their gods, for they even burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods. Everything that I command you, you shall be careful to do. You shall not add to it or take from it." (Deuteronomy 12:29-32, ESV)

So, there you have it - case closed! It is clear. God doesn't want his people adopting pagan practices in their worship of him! The PLAIN TRUTH is that God doesn't want his people adding to or taking away from what he has commanded them! Right? Not so fast!

Let's take a closer look at that passage from Deuteronomy. Question: To whom were these instructions given? Answer: The Children of Israel! Question: What pagan practices did God designate as unacceptable for the Israelites? Answer: Using the places where the former inhabitants of the Promised Land worshipped their gods! Also, in the latter passage, they were instructed NOT to worship God in the way that those nations who had lived there before them worshipped their gods! Moreover, notice that this passage also spells out that God hated the way they sacrificed their children as burnt offerings to their gods! Question: What commandments was God talking about when he instructed the Israelites not to add or subtract from them? Answer: The commandments that he was giving to THEM - Torah! In other words, these instructions were given to the Israelites to outline how God wanted THEM to deal with the religious practices of the former inhabitants of the Promised Land! This was also consistent with the commandments NOT to have any gods besides, before, or in place of THE GOD and NOT to make any idols to worship (images of gods). Moreover, students of Torah will also remember that God had given the Israelites instructions about a Tabernacle and a future central sanctuary for them to use in worshipping HIM (Deuteronomy 12:20-28 and 16:1-17). Likewise, we know that God gave the children of Israel specific commandments about a number of Holy Days which THEY would observe in their worship of HIM! (Leviticus 23 and Deuteronomy 16:1-17)

Question: What do these instructions have to do with the Celtic peoples? Answer: Nothing! What do these instructions have to do with Christians? Answer: Nothing! Question: Who were they for? Answer: The Children of Israel!

Now, with that background in hand. We will turn our attention to the Celtic holiday which the ACOGs and Jehovah's Witnesses characterize as the forerunner of our modern Halloween. On the website Irish Myths, in their article titled A Brief History of Samhain, we read: "Samhain (“summer’s end”) marked the conclusion of one pastoral year and the commencement of the next. As an ancient Celt, you would have been keenly aware that the days were noticeably shorter during the Samhain season, as if the sun itself were in retreat. The world was darker. The harvest, over...So the ancient Celts did what any sensible people would do in the face of encroaching darkness: They shined a light."

Likewise, on the History.com website, in their article titled Samhain, we read: "Ancient Celts marked Samhain as the most significant of the four quarterly fire festivals, taking place at the midpoint between the fall equinox and the winter solstice. During this time of year, hearth fires in family homes were left to burn out while the harvest was gathered. After the harvest work was complete, celebrants joined with Druid priests to light a community fire using a wheel that would cause friction and spark flames. The wheel was considered a representation of the sun and used along with prayers. Cattle were sacrificed, and participants took a flame from the communal bonfire back to their home to relight the hearth. Early texts present Samhain as a mandatory celebration lasting three days and three nights where the community was required to show themselves to local kings or chieftains. Failure to participate was believed to result in punishment from the gods, usually illness or death."

A little further, in the same article, we learn that: "Because the Celts believed that the barrier between worlds was breachable during Samhain, they prepared offerings that were left outside villages and fields for fairies, or Sidhs. It was expected that ancestors might cross over during this time as well, and Celts would dress as animals and monsters so that fairies were not tempted to kidnap them. Some specific monsters were associated with the mythology surrounding Samhain, including a shape-shifting creature called a Pukah that receives harvest offerings from the field. The Lady Gwyn is a headless woman dressed in white who chases night wanderers and was accompanied by a black pig." Hence, we see that the Celtic mythology surrounding this festival associated it with the supernatural, and a time when evil forces might enter their world and work their mischief among them.

Question: Does any of that sound like our celebration of Halloween? Answer: Outside of the supernatural mythology, the festival sounds more like the fall harvest festivals of the ancient Israelites! After all, most Americans don't let the fires go out in their fireplaces during harvest time (the majority of homes don't even have fireplaces anymore), and they aren't in the habit of lighting a communal bonfire for the purpose of relighting their own extinguished home fires. Likewise, outside of young folks, I don't think that many modern Americans believe in fairies or monsters, and they certainly aren't disguising their children to protect them from being kidnapped by fairies!

Question: If we didn't get it from the Celts, where did this "Halloween" originate? Answer: The holiday is derived from the vigil for All Saints' Day. In the online version of the Catholic Encyclopedia, in their entry for "All Saints' Day," we read: "The vigil of this feast is popularly called 'Hallowe'en' or 'Halloween.' Continuing, we are informed that: "In the early days the Christians were accustomed to solemnize the anniversary of a martyr's death for Christ at the place of martyrdom. In the fourth century, neighbouring <sic> dioceses began to interchange feasts, to transfer relics, to divide them, and to join in a common feast ; as is shown by the invitation of St. Basil of Caesarea (397) to the bishops of the province of Pontus. Frequently groups of martyrs suffered on the same day, which naturally led to a joint commemoration. In the persecution of Diocletian the number of martyrs became so great that a separate day could not be assigned to each. But the Church, feeling that every martyr should be venerated, appointed a common day for all. The first trace of this we find in Antioch on the Sunday after Pentecost. We also find mention of a common day in a sermon of St. Ephrem the Syrian (373), and in the 74th homily of St. John Chrysostom (407). At first only martyrs and St. John the Baptist were honoured <sic> by a special day. Other saints were added gradually, and increased in number when a regular process of canonization was established; still, as early as 411 there is in the Chaldean Calendar a 'Commemoratio Confessorum' for the Friday after Easter. In the West Boniface IV , 13 May, 609, or 610, consecrated the Pantheon in Rome to the Blessed Virgin and all the martyrs, ordering an anniversary. Gregory III (731-741) consecrated a chapel in the Basilica of St. Peter to all the saints and fixed the anniversary for 1 November. A basilica of the Apostles already existed in Rome, and its dedication was annually remembered on 1 May. Gregory IV (827-844) extended the celebration on 1 November to the entire Church. The vigil seems to have been held as early as the feast itself. The octave was added by Sixtus IV (1471-84)."

Now, with all of this history as evidence, we are forced to conclude that Halloween is a development of the Christian Era! Hold on! Jesus didn't say anything about honoring saints or martyrs! Question: Are you sure about that? Actually, the writings of the New Testament have a great deal to say about saints and martyrs being honored (See Revelation 6:9-11, 17:6, 20:4, I Thessalonians 3:13, 4:16, Jude 1:14, Revelation 11:18, 5:10, etc.). Question: Well, what about all of that stuff related to ghosts, witches, demons, and the like? Answer: Are you suggesting that all of those things are NOT mentioned in Scripture? Now, I'm certainly NOT condoning or suggesting that you dress up your children to look like demons and ghosts, but I think that we can all see that the superstitious paranoia of these folks is just a little overboard - a little pharisaical! Bottom line, observe Halloween or don't - it's up to you and your conscience, but don't try to pin your decision to shun it on God's commandment! 

    

Tuesday, October 29, 2024

Christianity Today on Christian Nationalism

In the September/October edition of Christianity Today, Russell Moore contributed an article titled The Uneasy Conscience of Christian Nationalism (which I am happy to recommend). In the piece, Moore cautions Christian nationalists that the eutopia they seek may not be the reality that they end up with. Indeed, he likens the current climate among Evangelicals of that bent to the moral equivalent of the selling of indulgences which prompted Luther to nail his paper to the door of the castle. He wrote: "In our time, the indulgences are more akin to a hotel’s green initiative than to the construction of St. Peter’s. The new Christian nationalism—like the withered old state churches of Europe and the secularized old social gospels of mainline Protestantism—defines Christianity in terms of reforming external structures rather than of regenerating internal psyches. Unlike the older theological liberalisms, though, Christian nationalists seek solidarity not in the actual mitigating of human suffering but in the mostly symbolic boundary markers of taking the right amount of theatrical umbrage at culture war outrages, at having the right kind of enemies, at 'owning the libs.'"

Moore went on to quote Philip Yancey (a longtime columnist at Christianity Today) about the fate of the Soviet Union: "Humans dream of systems so perfect that no one will need to be good, wrote T. S. Eliot, who saw many of his friends embrace the dream of Marxism. 'But the man that is - will shadow the man that pretends to be.' What we were hearing from Soviet leaders, and the KGB, and now Pravda, was that the Soviet Union ended up with the worst of both: a society far from perfect, and a people who had forgotten how to be good." He went on to conclude: "We should not pretend that we could not see the same thing with a lifeless, politicized dystopian Christian nationalism as we saw with a hollowed-out Soviet empire. What a tragic end it would be to wind up with a society as debauched as ever and a people who have forgotten how to be saved. The way forward is what it’s always been. As Luther said in his Heidelberg Disputation, 'The theologian of glory calls evil good and good evil. The theologian of the cross calls a thing what it is.' Sometimes that means nailing a word or two to the castle door. Sometimes that might mean letting goods and kindred go. The whole of the Christian life is about repentance. That repentance must be about the renewing of our minds and the renovation of our hearts, not just the laundering of consciences that are no longer bound to the Word of God."

From my perspective, that's just about right. We can huff and puff about the culture wars, protest at abortion clinics, and insist on voting for the "right" candidate OR We can focus on repenting of our own shortcomings and sins, trying to live our best lives in the here and now, and helping others to be successful in the same pursuits. Bottom line, religious/spiritual does NOT equal political/civic. If we claim to be Christians, we MUST remember that our primary allegiance is to God, Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit, and the Kingdom of God!    

Saturday, October 26, 2024

When Are You Going to Admit that Bill Watson IS RIGHT?

Pastor Bill Watson of the Church of God International is certainly consistent – I’ll give him that! He has never wavered in his conviction that he has the truth, and that it is his job to try to convince everybody else to conform to the dictates of his conscience.

Pastor Watson opened his remarks with a warning about a potential widening of the ongoing wars involving Israel because of that nation’s counterattack on Iran. Turning his attention closer to home, the pastor reminded his audience that the general election was rapidly approaching in the United States. Watson said that he saw some of Trump’s most recent rally, and that “DJT” was “essentially trolling the Marxist group of people, the Marxist party, frankly, that stands for killing children – I’m not going to make any apologies for that, because that’s what that party stands for - open borders, by-the-way, higher taxes, and let the prices continue to rise. If you like it, you can vote for that particular party of Marxists…” Once again, however, Bill insisted that he wasn’t talking politics – that he was talking “policy.”

Then, finally, Mr. Watson waded into the main topic of his message: How important it is for everyone to observe the festivals outlined in Torah. Hewing close to the Armstrongist party line, he insisted that Christians need a yearly reminder about what God is working out here on earth. Ironically, after fifty years of observing these festivals, Bill still hasn’t learned what they symbolize or mean! Indeed, instead of underscoring how they ALL point to CHRIST, Watson parroted Mr. Armstrong’s nonsense about how they portray the “truths” which he alone had deciphered and revealed. For Bill, the Eucharist is only to be performed within the context of the yearly Jewish Passover. Likewise, Christians MUST make a concerted effort to deleaven their houses, cars and toasters. The Day of Atonement is all about Satan, and the Feast of Tabernacles is all about the Millenium. And, of course, Bill means that all of them should be observed according to Armstrongist tradition (don’t worry about all of those instructions in the books of Leviticus and Deuteronomy).

Talk about a true-believer, Mr. Watson is it. He believes that physical observances (rituals) repeated over and over again are the way to grow in grace and knowledge. Never mind that mushy love stuff! For Bill, true spirituality is found in performing all of the rituals which Mr. Armstrong identified in Torah as being binding on “true” Christians. For him, the New Covenant is built on the foundation of the Old one – an updated version of the same deal which God made with the children of Israel. According to Bill, Christ’s fulfillment of the Law of Moses does NOT mean that we are exempt from obeying it. Forget that stuff about Christians not being justified by the works of the Law. For Bill, Christians would be lost without the Torah!

Come to think of it, Bill may be right to worry about his flock’s observance of those Jewish rituals. Indeed, all of the clips that I looked at of ACOG feast sites showed a lot of empty seats, and most of the ones that were occupied were supporting elderly men and women. In fact, there were quite a few empty pews at Medina this past Sabbath for Bill’s sermon! 


The Major Problems with Armstrongism (which this blog and others have identified)

The following teachings of Herbert Armstrong have been thoroughly refuted here and elsewhere:

1. The nature of God. His teachings about the Trinity, and more particularly those that were related to the Holy Spirit.

2. The nature of the human potential. His teaching that man would one day be equal to God.

3. The biblical origins of the English-speaking nations of the earth. His teaching that the people of the United States and Britain are the descendants of the birthright tribes of Israel (Ephraim and Manasseh).

4. That the return of Jesus Christ to this earth is imminent. He repeatedly engaged in date setting and misleading people about the signs of the times.

5. That Christians are obligated to observe the commandments of Torah (including the weekly Sabbath, Holy Days, tithing, and clean and unclean animals as food.

6. That the symbolism of the Holy Days reflected Armstrong's understanding of God's plan. More particularly, his understanding of the meaning of Atonement, Trumpets, and Tabernacles.

7. The nature, purpose, and fate of the angels. Especially, as it related to Satan and his demons.

8. The nature of the ekklesia. His teachings about government within the Church, the composition of the Church, disfellowshipping, and that traditional Christians were deceived members of a false church, a pseudo-ekklesia.

9. The influence of paganism on Christianity. More particularly, his teachings regarding Christmas, Easter, Halloween, Saint's Days, etc., and his rejection of the cross as a Christian symbol.

10. The interpretation of prophecy. More particularly, his headline theology and insinuating modern nations, institutions, and leaders into biblical prophecies.

11. The nature of the Gospel. More particularly, his de-emphasis on the person and work of Jesus of Nazareth and what all of that meant for humanity.

12. The nature of the Kingdom of God. He ignored the anti-authoritarian message of Christ and dismissed the fundamental change that was being wrought in the nature of humanity. Instead, he emphasized a literal government which would forcibly impose its will on everyone.

13. The nature and purpose of human sexuality. More particularly, his teachings about dating, marriage, homosexuality, divorce and remarriage, child rearing, appropriate clothing, makeup, and what constituted sexual lust.

14. The nature and role of faith and works in the life of a Christian. His understanding of love, mercy, forgiveness, repentance, faith in Christ, and physical works was twisted and inconsistent with what is revealed in Scripture.

15. The way that Scripture was used and interpreted. Mr. Armstrong's insistence on literalism and proof-texting; and his rejection of all textual criticism, along with the way he ignored context, doomed his interpretations of Scripture to failure.

Thursday, October 24, 2024

Is Someone Trying to Steal Your Crown?

Over at Banned by HWA, in reaction to Dennis Diehl's post about the dangers inherent to trying to live one's life in accordance with a Divine purpose, a conversation was inaugurated about whether or not Dennis was trying to steal a Christian's metaphorical crown. Now, this is not the first time this charge has been leveled against the various authors of the posts which appear on that blog. Of course, we must first understand that the entire blog is devoted to holding Armstrongist "agents of deception accountable." In other words, everything which appears there is meant to expose the inconsistencies and errors inherent to the theology of the Armstrong Churches of God - to prevent THEM from "stealing your crown."

The concept of crown stealing is drawn from a passage in the book of Revelation. In the messages to the seven ekklesia of Asia, the congregation at Philadelphia was praised for its faithfulness to God's word and their perseverance in the face of opposition to their work (Revelation 3:7-10). Then, in the next verse, we read: "I am coming soon. Hold fast what you have, so that no one may seize your crown." (Revelation 3:11, ESV) What did they have to hold on to? Wasn't it faithfulness to God's word and perseverance in the face of opposition? Are the Armstrong Churches of God faithful to God's word? OR Are they the agents of deception that we contend they are? In other words, if they aren't being faithful to God's word, then what do they have to hold on to?

In this connection, I have always thought that the message to the ekklesia at Laodicea was more appropriate for the Armstrong Churches of God. We read there: "For you say, I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing, not realizing that you are wretched, pitiable, poor, blind, and naked. I counsel you to buy from me gold refined by fire, so that you may be rich, and white garments so that you may clothe yourself and the shame of your nakedness may not be seen, and salve to anoint your eyes, so that you may see." (Revelation 3:17-18, ESV) Indeed, they glory in the "truth" which they possess even as they completely misunderstand the nature of the "crown" they seek to protect and the kingdom which it represents!

The Greek word "stephanos" is translated into English as "crown." It is indicative of the wreath, garland, coronet which was worn by the Roman emperor or given as a prize to the victor in the public games of that time - a symbol of the honor due to a particular person. In his letter to the ekklesia at Corinth, Paul wrote: "Do you not know that in a race all the runners run, but only one receives the prize? So run that you may obtain it. Every athlete exercises self-control in all things. They do it to receive a perishable wreath, but we an imperishable. So I do not run aimlessly; I do not box as one beating the air. But I discipline my body and keep it under control, lest after preaching to others I myself should be disqualified." (I Corinthians 9:24-27, ESV) Likewise, he called the saints at Philippi his "joy and crown" in the Lord (Philippians 4:1). Paul also wrote to Timothy that a "crown of righteousness" was waiting for him "which the Lord, the righteous judge, will award to me on that day, and not only to me but also to all who have loved his appearing." (II Timothy 4:8, ESV) For those who endure trials, James said that they would receive a "crown of life" someday (James 1:12, ESV). Moreover, Peter wrote to the leaders of the ekklesia to: "shepherd the flock of God that is among you, exercising oversight, not under compulsion, but willingly, as God would have you; not for shameful gain, but eagerly; not domineering over those in your charge, but being examples to the flock. And when the chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the unfading crown of glory." (I Peter 5:1-4, ESV)

In short, even the use of the "crown" as a metaphor in the writings of the New Testament undermines the teachings of the Armstrong Churches of God about the Kingdom of God and the reward that Christian's are intended to receive from God! Finally, I would also point out that this context makes abundantly clear that YOU are responsible for protecting your crown - NO ONE can steal it from you if you are doing what you're supposed to be doing!  

Sunday, October 20, 2024

The Purpose of Life

Dennis Diehl just posted an article titled The Danger in "The God Given Purpose" on the Banned by HWA blog, and I highly recommend that everyone read it. Unfortunately, I know all too well that there will be a few narrow-minded readers who will automatically dismiss whatever Dennis has to say because he is an atheist (I've experienced the same phenomenon because of my homosexuality). Oh well, it is as they say, "they don't know what they are missing!" Scripture tells us that it is dangerous to be without counsel, and that wisdom is to be found in a multitude of counselors - suggesting a variety of perspectives and opinions (Proverbs 11:14). In other words, you don't have to embrace everything that I, Dennis, or anyone else has to say on some subject, but you might find something useful in formulating your own perspective on the topic.

Dennis began his post with some quotes from another counselor:

"Isn't it fantastic that if there is no purpose you have nothing to fulfill. You can just live. But no. You want a purpose and not just a simple purpose, but a God given purpose. It's very dangerous. People who think they have a God given purpose are doing the cruelest things on the planet. They are doing the most horrible things. And they have always been doing the most horrible things. Because when you are given a God given purpose, life here becomes less important than your purpose."

Dennis then proceeded to summarize his own spiritual journey - beginning in the Dutch Reformed Church, followed by his experiences in Herbert Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God and ending in the rejection of all manmade religion. He then concluded by agreeing with those quotations that he began with, and "The purpose in life is to live."

Now, interestingly, those who profess to be disciples of Jesus of Nazareth would come up with all kinds of answers to the question: "What is the purpose of life?" For many more traditional Christians, the answers might involve anything from the Great Commission, being kind and compassionate to others, or getting to heaven someday. For most Armstrongites, the answer would be becoming a priest-king in God's Kingdom and/or becoming God! For me, the Scriptural and obviously natural answer is much closer to the answer provided by the guru and Dennis!

If we look at the natural world around us, we see that ALL of the life on this planet is preoccupied with the perpetuation of itself. Both instinct and cognition impel us to avoid hurt and death. Even the process of evolution is defined by the adaptation of life to whatever environment it inhabits! Moreover, every species of life on this planet has the ability to reproduce - to perpetuate itself. Plants produce seeds, and animals produce offspring. What's more, EVERY system (respiratory, circulatory, digestive, etc.) within this organism we call "human" is designed to sustain its life! Hence, we see that the most profound and reasonable answer to our question about the purpose of life is the perpetuation of ourselves! Too simple and mundane for you? Let's look at some Scripture on this subject.

In the first chapter of Genesis, it is revealed that God created life and gave it the ability to reproduce. And, notice the very first instructions which God gave to the first humans: "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth!" (Genesis 1:28, ESV) In the very next chapter, it is revealed that one of the trees which God placed in the Garden of Eden was referred to as the Tree of Life (Genesis 2:9). Interestingly, we are told that the humans had access to this tree (Genesis 2:16). Indeed, the only one that they were forbidden to eat of its fruit was the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil (Genesis 2:17) - the one that would lead to DEATH! Then, at the end of the third chapter, we read: "Then the Lord God said, 'Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil. Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever—' therefore the Lord God sent him out from the garden of Eden to work the ground from which he was taken. He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life." (Genesis 3:22-24, ESV)

What follows, in both the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures, is the story about how God gets mankind back to LIFE! In Torah, we read that God told the Israelites: "See, I have set before you today life and good, death and evil. If you obey the commandments of the Lord your God that I command you today, by loving the Lord your God, by walking in his ways, and by keeping his commandments and his statutes and his rules, then you shall live and multiply, and the Lord your God will bless you in the land that you are entering to take possession of it." (Deuteronomy 30:15-16, ESV) Continuing, the thought concluded with: "I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore, choose life, that you and your offspring may live." (Deuteronomy 30:19, ESV) Clearly, God's purpose was the perpetuation of LIFE!

In the Greek New Testament, we read: "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life." (John 3:16, ESV) A little later, in the same Gospel, we read that Jesus said: "I came that they may have life and have it abundantly. (John 10:10, ESV) Likewise, Paul wrote to the saints at Rome (a favorite of Armstrongites): "For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." (Romans 6:23, ESV) He also wrote to the saints at Corinth on this wise: "The first man Adam became a living being”; the last Adam became a life-giving spirit. But it is not the spiritual that is first but the natural, and then the spiritual." (I Corinthians 15:45-46, ESV) He went on to explain: "For this perishable body must put on the imperishable, and this mortal body must put on immortality. When the perishable puts on the imperishable, and the mortal puts on immortality, then shall come to pass the saying that is written: 'Death is swallowed up in victory. O death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting?'" (I Corinthians 15:53-55, ESV) Finally, the author of the epistle to the Hebrews wrote: "Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same things, that through death he might destroy the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil, and deliver all those who through fear of death were subject to lifelong slavery." (Hebrews 2:14-15, ESV)

Now, it is inevitable that someone will ask: "Who wants to live forever?" (The Queen song from Highlander is playing in my mind as I write - great song) But isn't that really a question about the quality of life - NOT its purpose? In other words, would your answer to that question be different if you didn't have to worry about your health, losing loved ones, war, pollution, over-crowding, starvation, crime, etc.? In the book of Revelation, we read about a new heaven and earth where God "will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away." (Revelation 21:1-4, ESV) Afraid of getting bored? What if you were always preoccupied with the perpetuation of life?

Nevertheless, Dennis makes a valid and an astute point about folks wasting this life in pursuit of their purpose - another point which gets us back to the issue of quality of life. I think that this is best answered by something written long ago that was attributed to the wise King Solomon: "I perceived that there is nothing better for them than to be joyful and to do good as long as they live; also, that everyone should eat and drink and take pleasure in all his toil—this is God's gift to man." (Ecclesiastes 3:12-13, ESV) In other words, we should be enjoying what we do in this life! As for purpose, he had this to say: "For everything there is a season, and a time for every matter under heaven:

a time to be born, and a time to die;

a time to plant, and a time to pluck up what is planted;

a time to kill, and a time to heal;

a time to break down, and a time to build up;

a time to weep, and a time to laugh;

a time to mourn, and a time to dance;

a time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together;

a time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing;

a time to seek, and a time to lose;

a time to keep, and a time to cast away;

a time to tear, and a time to sew;

a time to keep silence, and a time to speak;

a time to love, and a time to hate;

a time for war, and a time for peace. (Ecclesiastes 3:1-8, ESV) 

Finally, while Jesus certainly instructed his disciples to make the Kingdom of God a priority in their lives, he also said: "Therefore do not be anxious about tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble." (Matthew 6:34, ESV)

"The purpose in life is to live." I think that's just about right!

Thursday, October 17, 2024

The Parable of the Talents

 The Parable of the Talents

14 “For it will be like a man going on a journey, who called his servants and entrusted to them his property. 15 To one he gave five talents, to another two, to another one, to each according to his ability. Then he went away. 16 He who had received the five talents went at once and traded with them, and he made five talents more. 17 So also he who had the two talents made two talents more. 18 But he who had received the one talent went and dug in the ground and hid his master's money. 19 Now after a long time the master of those servants came and settled accounts with them. 20 And he who had received the five talents came forward, bringing five talents more, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me five talents; here, I have made five talents more.’ 21 His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 22 And he also who had the two talents came forward, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me two talents; here, I have made two talents more.’ 23 His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 24 He also who had received the one talent came forward, saying, ‘Master, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you scattered no seed, 25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here, you have what is yours.’ 26 But his master answered him, ‘You wicked and slothful servant! You knew that I reap where I have not sown and gather where I scattered no seed? 27 Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and at my coming I should have received what was my own with interest. 28 So take the talent from him and give it to him who has the ten talents. 29 For to everyone who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance. But from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. 30 And cast the worthless servant into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’

--Matthew 25:14-30, ESV

Will You Be Ruling Over Ten Cities?

In my last post, I discussed how Herbert Armstrong confused human notions about governance and the exercise of authority with God's conception of those things. Indeed, we demonstrated that his failure to comprehend the profound differences between the two models led him to twist the meaning of the Kingdom of God! To be more precise, we made it very clear that Armstrong's emphasis on GOVERNMENT and RULERSHIP was misguided, and it twisted his understanding of what the Gospel of the Kingdom of God was all about. In this post, we will demonstrate that it also twisted his understanding of one of Christ's parables about the Kingdom (It actually twisted Armstrong's understanding of many parables, but we don't have the space or time to go through all of them here).

In the nineteenth chapter of Luke, we read:

11 The crowd was listening to everything Jesus said. And because he was nearing Jerusalem, he told them a story to correct the impression that the Kingdom of God would begin right away. 12 He said, “A nobleman was called away to a distant empire to be crowned king and then return. 13 Before he left, he called together ten of his servants and divided among them ten pounds of silver, saying, ‘Invest this for me while I am gone.’ 14 But his people hated him and sent a delegation after him to say, ‘We do not want him to be our king.’

15 “After he was crowned king, he returned and called in the servants to whom he had given the money. He wanted to find out what their profits were. 16 The first servant reported, ‘Master, I invested your money and made ten times the original amount!’

17 ‘Well done!’ the king exclaimed. ‘You are a good servant. You have been faithful with the little I entrusted to you, so you will be governor of ten cities as your reward.’

18 “The next servant reported, ‘Master, I invested your money and made five times the original amount.’

19 ‘Well done!’ the king said. ‘You will be governor over five cities.’

20 “But the third servant brought back only the original amount of money and said, ‘Master, I hid your money and kept it safe. 21 I was afraid because you are a hard man to deal with, taking what isn’t yours and harvesting crops you didn’t plant.’

22 ‘You wicked servant!’ the king roared. ‘Your own words condemn you. If you knew that I’m a hard man who takes what isn’t mine and harvests crops I didn’t plant, 23 why didn’t you deposit my money in the bank? At least I could have gotten some interest on it.’

24 “Then, turning to the others standing nearby, the king ordered, ‘Take the money from this servant, and give it to the one who has ten pounds.’

25 ‘But, master,’ they said, ‘he already has ten pounds!’

26 ‘Yes,’ the king replied, ‘and to those who use well what they are given, even more will be given. But from those who do nothing, even what little they have will be taken away. 27 And as for these enemies of mine who didn’t want me to be their king—bring them in and execute them right here in front of me.’”

In his explanation of this parable, Herbert Armstrong wrote: "Now notice in verse 17, the one who had gained ten pounds is given authority to RULE CITIES - 'have thou authority over ten cities'! To the one who had gained five pounds, he said, 'Be thou also over five cities.' This is speaking of the SECOND COMING OF CHRIST and of His delegating authority to rule to saints converted during this Christian era, between Christ's first and second appearings (sic) on earth. This parable, then, was spoken to make clear to us that the Kingdom of God is a literal GOVERNMENT, to be set up AT CHRIST'S SECOND COMING - and not before!" - Just What Do You Mean - Kingdom of God? Armstrong also observed on another occasion "Some resurrected saints will rule over ten cities, some over five (Luke 19: 17 -19)." - Tomorrow - What It Will Be Like

Unfortunately, Mr. Armstrong always had trouble interpreting symbolism because of his obsession with literalism. He seems to have forgotten what a parable is! In their article, What is a Parable? Christianity.com provides this definition of a parable: "A parable is a simple story used to illustrate a moral or spiritual lesson, as told by Jesus in the Gospels. The word "parable" comes from the Greek word 'parabolÄ“,' which means 'comparison' or 'illustration.' Parables typically employ everyday situations and characters, making them accessible to a wide audience." In the writings of Herbert Armstrong referenced in the preceding paragraph, he seemed to understand that the nobleman represented Christ, but he quickly abandons any notion of symbolic meaning and declares that this passage means that resurrect saints will be ruling over literal cities in God's Kingdom! In other words, he is making the parable conform to his understanding that the Kingdom of God is all about "GOVERNMENT."

Now, let's return to the parable itself and reread it without Mr. Armstrong's obvious bias. According to Luke, why did Jesus give this parable? Didn't he tell them this story "to correct the impression that the Kingdom of God would begin right away?" Isn't it obvious that Christ's disciples had the same obsession with a literal, human-like kingdom that Herbert Armstrong developed? Didn't Christ's disciples think in terms of Christ overthrowing Roman rule and restoring the Davidic Kingdom? In this connection, please review Acts 1:6-8. Do you think that the parable is about actual money being distributed to Christ's disciples? Is it possible that the story is pointing to the gifts of the Holy Spirit being distributed to them? Is it possible that the story is suggesting that those servants should be about the business of growing in grace and knowledge - developing the fruits of that Spirit which were entrusted to them? Is it possible that the story is suggesting that those individuals who have grown the most in love, kindness, and mercy will be the greatest in the Kingdom? Indeed, wouldn't such an interpretation be more consistent with our understanding of the definition of a parable? What do you think?

One more thing. All of this brings another passage of Scripture to mind. In the thirteenth chapter of Matthew, we read:

10 His disciples came and asked him, 'Why do you use parables when you talk to the people?'

11 He replied, 'You are permitted to understand the secrets of the Kingdom of Heaven, but others are not. 12 To those who listen to my teaching, more understanding will be given, and they will have an abundance of knowledge. But for those who are not listening, even what little understanding they have will be taken away from them. 13 That is why I use these parables, For they look, but they don’t really see. They hear, but they don’t really listen or understand.'" (Matthew 13:10-13, NLT)

Is it just me, or does that suggest anything to you about Herbert Armstrong's status as a disciple of Jesus Christ?

 

Tuesday, October 15, 2024

The Kingdom of God: A Different Kind of Authority

In his booklet Just What Do You Mean - Kingdom of God? Herbert Armstrong wrote about a prophecy delivered to the King of Babylon in the book of Daniel:

"Notice! This is speaking of KINGDOMS. It is referring to kingdoms that bear rule over the people on earth. It is speaking of GOVERNMENTS! It is not speaking of ethereal sentiments 'set up in the hearts of men.' It is not speaking of churches. It is speaking of the kind of GOVERNMENTS that bear RULE and AUTHORITY over nations of PEOPLE here on earth. It is literal. It is specific. There is no misunderstanding, here, as to what is meant by the word: KINGDOM.'"

Mr. Armstrong then proceeded to explain that the prophecy outlined "a succession of world-ruling governments." After the final government, Mr. Armstrong believed the God would set up his own government. He wrote:

"This is THE KINGDOM OF GOD. It is the END of present governments - the governments that rule Russia, China, Japan, Italy, Germany - yes, and even the United States and the British nations. They then shall become the kingdoms - the GOVERNMENTS of the Lord JESUS CHRIST, then KING of kings over the entire earth. This makes completely PLAIN the fact that the KINGDOM OF GOD is a literal GOVERNMENT. Even as the Chaldean Empire was a KINGDOM - even as the Roman Empire was a KINGDOM - so the KINGDOM OF GOD is a government. It is to take over the GOVERNMENT of the NATIONS of the world.

Jesus Christ was BORN to be a KING - a RULER!" - Just What Do You Mean - Kingdom of God?

This is where Armstrong and Jehovah's Witnesses made a critical mistake in their understanding of the Gospel. They wrongly assumed that God intended to replace all of the human kingdoms/governments of the world with his own version of THEIR kingdoms/governments. In Armstrong's interpretation, God would replace the AUTHORITY of humans by assuming the authority to rule himself! In other words, for Armstrong and his followers, the important difference was that man would be replaced at the top of the AUTHORITY pyramid by God! What they failed to understand was the fact that God's notion of authority and government was fundamentally DIFFERENT from man's conception of them!

In short, the Kingdom of God is about so much more than replacing a bunch of bad rulers with a good one! When the Jews handed Jesus over to Pilate, the Roman governor asked him if he was a king. Christ responded: "My Kingdom is not an earthly kingdom. If it were, my followers would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jewish leaders. But my Kingdom is not of this world." (John 18:36, NLT) This was apparently hard for this human ruler to understand. The Governor asked, "So, you are a king?" (John 18:37) Continuing, we read: "Jesus responded, “You say I am a king. Actually, I was born and came into the world to testify to the truth. All who love the truth recognize that what I say is true." (John 18:37, NLT) And, considering my audience, we need to make very plain that the truth which Christ was referencing was NOT the little package of doctrines which Armstrong identified as "THE TRUTH."

No, THE TRUTH which Christ spoke about concerned the real nature of HIS KINGDOM, the one which he spoke about in his parables! The one which eschewed the lust for material wealth, power, and conquest. THE KINGDOM which focuses on THE LAW of love, forgiveness, reconciliation, mercy, peace, healing, and service to others. THE KINGDOM which focuses on training the world to follow God's way by setting a good example for others to follow, NOT the human way of standing in front of a classroom and lecturing students. THE KINGDOM which has a completely different conception of AUTHORITY and its uses, NOT the human way of imposing one's will and agenda on others. THE KINGDOM which seeks the glorification of others, NOT the glorification of the ruler. THE KINGDOM without borders and without any lust for the territory or resources of others. THE KINGDOM which is focused on what's in the hearts of its subjects, NOT in the duties which they owe to the state!

What Herbert Armstrong failed to understand is that the books of Daniel and Revelation are focused on the CONTRAST between human notions about authority and governance and Divine notions of those things! Whether human governance was manifested by Egypt, Babylon, Persia, Greece, or Rome, there was a certain formula which all of them are portrayed as following. Indeed, they are all characterized by authoritarianism, selfishness, cruelty, demanding worship of the state, and militant belligerence. Moreover, they are all portrayed as being motivated by the lust for more territory, wealth, and power. For all of these human governments, their subjects were regarded as owing their complete allegiance to the state and its objectives, while the state really didn't owe them anything! The subjects were there to serve the state and its interests. In short, the exact OPPOSITE of the Divine model!

When two of Christ's disciples expressed their desire to be given the highest positions of authority in his kingdom, Jesus replied: "You know that the rulers in this world lord it over their people, and officials flaunt their authority over those under them. But among you it will be different. Whoever wants to be a leader among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first among you must become your slave. For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve others and to give his life as a ransom for many." (Matthew 20:25-28, NLT) Now, this model of "servant leadership" was obviously very foreign to even his disciples' notions about leadership. Indeed, it is apparent that they thought that they would be lording it over people in Christ's kingdom! Nevertheless, Jesus made it clear here and in many other passages that he was a different kind of king.

In the New Testament, the Greek word "basileia" is translated into English as "kingdom." In the Blue Letter Bible entry for this word (click on the Greek word), the term is defined as: royal power, kingship, dominion, rule: 1. not to be confused with an actual kingdom but rather the right or authority to rule over a kingdom, 2. of the royal power of Jesus as the triumphant Messiah, 3. of the royal power and dignity conferred on Christians in the Messiah's kingdom." In light of this definition, it is interesting to note that the Greek word "exousia" appears over and over again in the New Testament canon. Once again, Blue Letter Bible informs us that this word is translated into English as "power, authority, right." As in Christ's statement that "All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth," or as the NLT renders it "I have been given all authority in heaven and on earth." (Matthew 28:18) Likewise, we know that Jesus taught in a manner that suggested he had the "authority" to do so (Matthew 7:29, Mark 1:22). We are also informed that Christ gave his disciples the power/authority to heal and to cast out demons (Mark 3:15). We are also told that Christ had the authority/power to execute judgment and to give eternal life (John 5:27 and 17:2). Perhaps, most importantly, Christ had the power/authority to lay down his life and take it up again (John 10:18).

In short, we can see that our human notions about governance and authority are the ANTITHESIS of God's Kingdom! In other words, it isn't a matter of replacing one dictator with another - albeit a superior and more benevolent one! NO, the Kingdom of God represents an entirely different way of exercising power/authority. It is also NOT based on the aggrandizement of a person or the state. Instead, the Kingdom of God is concerned with the welfare and salvation of its subjects - of serving the people under its authority/power.  

  

Saturday, October 12, 2024

Donald Trump Is NOT in the Bible (and anyone who says so is a false prophet)!

Within both Evangelical Christian Circles and the Armstrong Churches of God, there are several folks who are saying that God is using Donald Trump to save America. Indeed, some of them say that Donald Trump's presidency was prophesied in Scripture! The pastor of the Beth Israel Worship Center, Jonathan Cahn, says that Trump is the modern equivalent of King Jehu of Israel. The pastor general of the Philadelphia Church of God claims that Trump is the modern equivalent of King Jeroboam II. Moreover, these absurd notions are even boosted by more mainstream voices like Franklin Grahm! Unfortunately, a large number of Americans now believe that Trump has been ordained by God to save America.

It is astonishing to me that a post such as this would even be necessary. In a sane world that wasn't in the grips of a partisan fever, such notions would be quickly dismissed as incredible. Even more surreal is the fact that so many Christians have so willingly swallowed this unholy alliance between secular politics and the religion which they profess to follow. It's as if God and Ceasar have become one in the eyes of many of these people! They readily twist both Scripture and history to support their notion of America as God's own - a righteous Christian nation that has been corrupted by perverts, immigrants, abortionists, globalists, and Marxists. Indeed, they have traveled so far down the rabbit hole that they are almost completely divorced from reality - rejecting any evidence which contradicts their worldview!

Nevertheless, I would be remiss not to point out the fact that the folks who hold up Donald Trump as the savior of Christian values in America are utterly WRONG! Indeed, I believe that it is blasphemous to use God and Scripture to support such foolishness. Yes, the Hebrew Bible records several instances where God used secular Gentile leaders to punish or help "His" people, Israel. However, God NEVER used any of those leaders to restore or administer the observance of Torah - NEVER! No, there are a number of instances where God used secular Gentile leaders to invade, conquer, deport, defend, and return the Israelites; but I challenge anyone to cite a single example of God using one of them to enforce or protect "His" moral code for the people of Israel (hint - Cyrus is included in this challenge).

Also, I would be remiss not to point out that the United States of America is NOT Israel! The United States is NOT the Promised Land! The government of the United States is NOT of Divine origin - it is NOT God's Kingdom. Likewise, Capitalism is NOT God's monetary system! Moreover, throughout its history as a nation, the United States of America has NEVER been a righteous nation - NEVER! European settlers stole land from Native Americans, murdered and abused them, and broke nearly every promise which they ever made to them! They also enslaved their African brethren, mistreated them, murdered them, and discriminated against them! They ruthlessly exploited the natural resources of North America and much of the rest of the world. American history is also full of corruption, assassination, and immorality of all kinds! Plain and simple, there NEVER was a golden age of righteousness in America's past.

Finally, ALL of the prophets of the Hebrew Scriptures (Moses, Nathan, Elijah, Elisha, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Amos, Zechariah, etc.) were given messages FOR THE PEOPLE OF ISRAEL! Moreover, Jesus Christ said that HE was the fulfillment of Torah, the prophets, and the Psalms! Indeed, when those Scriptures were originally written, the United States of America wasn't even a glimmer in anyone's mind! Finally, Jehu usurped the throne of Israel, murdered the former royal family (and a king of Judah), and was evaluated as someone who "was not careful to walk in the law of the Lord, the God of Israel, with all his heart. He did not turn from the sins of Jeroboam, which he made Israel to sin." (II Kings 10:31) As for Jeroboam II, we read that "he did what was evil in the sight of the Lord. He did not depart from all the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, which he made Israel to sin." (II Kings 14:24) Indeed, the prophet Amos predicted a violent end for Jeroboam and the subjugation of his people (Amos 7). In other words, these were NOT good kings (they did NOT restore or enforce God's morality).

Hence, we have seen that placing Donald Trump in the role of God's anointed is absurd! It is a delusion, pure and simple! We are all free to vote the dictates of our own conscience, but please don't try to justify yourself as supporting God's anointed candidate - that's just plain old hogwash!  


Friday, October 11, 2024

Have You Ever Read Christ's Feast of Tabernacles Messages?

Every year, the Armstrong Churches of God designate various festival sites for their members to gather and observe the Feast of Tabernacles outlined in the Law of Moses. During their celebrations, there will be a large number of sermons delivered about the Kingdom of God coming to this earth. Indeed, for most of them, this festival celebrates the Millennial rule of Christ and his saints - a time of peace, happiness, and abundance. But is this really what this festival pictures? Is this what the festival symbolizes? OR Was this meaning imposed on the festival to fit Herbert Armstrong's interpretation of God's plan?

In previous posts, I have written about the fact that Torah's instructions for this festival had the Israelites construct temporary shelters around the Tabernacle or Temple to celebrate this festival. In some of those posts, I have also pointed out that Jesus Christ came to this earth to temporarily tabernacle in the flesh. Moreover, we should also note that Scripture alludes to the fact that humans currently inhabit a temporary dwelling, which we must someday leave behind for a more permanent home. Now, obviously, these things fit very well with the notion of a "Festival of Temporary Dwellings."

Even so, the Gospel of John records that Jesus observed this festival once upon a time in Jerusalem, and that he delivered two messages during his celebration of it. Now, I may be out in left field with this, but don't you think we should all be just a little bit interested in what he had to say on that occasion? For instance, did he talk about the Millenium? Did he discuss government? In short, what did Jesus talk about during the festival? Let's take a look!

John 7:16 So Jesus told them, “My message is not my own; it comes from God who sent me. 17 Anyone who wants to do the will of God will know whether my teaching is from God or is merely my own. 18 Those who speak for themselves want glory only for themselves, but a person who seeks to honor the one who sent him speaks truth, not lies. 19 Moses gave you the law, but none of you obeys it! In fact, you are trying to kill me.”

20 The crowd replied, “You’re demon possessed! Who’s trying to kill you?”

21 Jesus replied, “I did one miracle on the Sabbath, and you were amazed. 22 But you work on the Sabbath, too, when you obey Moses’ law of circumcision. (Actually, this tradition of circumcision began with the patriarchs, long before the law of Moses.) 23 For if the correct time for circumcising your son falls on the Sabbath, you go ahead and do it so as not to break the law of Moses. So why should you be angry with me for healing a man on the Sabbath? 24 Look beneath the surface so you can judge correctly.”

Now, that's interesting! He talked about the pitfalls of legalism!

37 On the last day, the climax of the festival, Jesus stood and shouted to the crowds, “Anyone who is thirsty may come to me! 38 Anyone who believes in me may come and drink! For the Scriptures declare, ‘Rivers of living water will flow from his heart.’” 39 (When he said “living water,” he was speaking of the Spirit, who would be given to everyone believing in him. But the Spirit had not yet been given, because Jesus had not yet entered into his glory.)

New Living Translation

This is what Christ chose to talk about during his only recorded observance of this festival. Again, maybe it's just me, but don't you think that this might have some application to the meaning of these days?

Monday, October 7, 2024

Satan Is NOT All That!

Herbert Armstrong portrayed Satan as a powerful and indestructible spirit being who ruled over this earth with his demons and had the ability to deceive and destroy. To support his narrative about Satan he quoted prooftexts from Isaiah, Ezekiel, Ephesians, and Revelation. Likewise, he often described the temptation of Christ as a "titanic" battle between good and evil. In short, for Mr. Armstrong, Satan was a powerful adversary bent on destroying humanity, and that there was very little that we puny humans could do to resist or defeat him.

Fortunately, however, Mr. Armstrong's narrative about Satan was/is NOT consistent with what is revealed in Scripture. Indeed, from the very first mention of this being in Scripture, his subjection to God is underscored, and his defeat is prophesied! The story of the fall of Adam and Eve is well-known to all of us. When God confronted the couple for eating from the tree which he had forbidden them to eat from, we are informed that the woman said that the serpent had deceived her (Genesis 3:13). Next, we read that God told the serpent: "Because you have done this, cursed are you above all livestock and above all beasts of the field; on your belly you shall go, and dust you shall eat all the days of your life. I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel." (Genesis 3:14-15, ESV) Notice, that God has the authority to curse the serpent and to predict that a descendant of the woman would "bruise your head" (indicative of a fatal injury), and that the serpent would only "bruise his heel."

In the next mention of Satan in Scripture, we read: "Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them. The Lord said to Satan, 'From where have you come?' Satan answered the Lord and said, 'From going to and fro on the earth, and from walking up and down on it.' And the Lord said to Satan, 'Have you considered my servant Job, that there is none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, who fears God and turns away from evil?' Then Satan answered the Lord and said, 'Does Job fear God for no reason? Have you not put a hedge around him and his house and all that he has, on every side? You have blessed the work of his hands, and his possessions have increased in the land. But stretch out your hand and touch all that he has, and he will curse you to your face.' And the Lord said to Satan, 'Behold, all that he has is in your hand. Only against him do not stretch out your hand.' So Satan went out from the presence of the Lord." (Job 1:6-12, ESV) Once again, we see that Satan is subject to God - that he presented himself to God along with the rest of the angelic host. Notice too, that he could only do what God ALLOWED him to do, nothing more!

Then, after Satan had removed Job's wealth and caused the death of his children, we read: "Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them to present himself before the Lord. And the Lord said to Satan, 'From where have you come?' Satan answered the Lord and said, 'From going to and fro on the earth, and from walking up and down on it.' And the Lord said to Satan, 'Have you considered my servant Job, that there is none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, who fears God and turns away from evil? He still holds fast his integrity, although you incited me against him to destroy him without reason.' Then Satan answered the Lord and said, 'Skin for skin! All that a man has he will give for his life. But stretch out your hand and touch his bone and his flesh, and he will curse you to your face.' And the Lord said to Satan, 'Behold, he is in your hand; only spare his life.'" (Job 2:1-6, ESV) Yet again, Satan was only allowed to do certain things by God. In other words, God was in control! Indeed, there is a strong sense here that God is using Satan for his own purposes - to effect a positive change in Job's life!

Likewise, in the book of Zechariah, we read: "Then he showed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of the Lord, and Satan standing at his right hand to accuse him. And the Lord said to Satan, 'The Lord rebuke you, O Satan! The Lord who has chosen Jerusalem rebuke you! Is not this a brand plucked from the fire?' Now Joshua was standing before the angel, clothed with filthy garments. And the angel said to those who were standing before him, 'Remove the filthy garments from him.' And to him he said, 'Behold, I have taken your iniquity away from you, and I will clothe you with pure vestments.' And I said, 'Let them put a clean turban on his head.' So they put a clean turban on his head and clothed him with garments. And the angel of the Lord was standing by." (Zechariah 3:1-5, ESV) Once again, Satan is portrayed as the accuser, but the Lord was clearly in charge of the situation. This Jehoshua (Hebrew: YHWH is salvation), acting as High Priest, was clearly a type of the Jehoshua (Jesus) who was to appear later for the saving of humankind, and Satan was REBUKED (his accusation was rejected)!

Now, before leaving the Old Testament, we should also take a closer look at those passages from Isaiah and Ezekiel that Herbert Armstrong liked to cite as prooftexts for his portrayal of Satan. In that passage from Isaiah, the King of Babylon was represented as Satan. We read there: "How the oppressor has ceased, the insolent fury ceased! The Lord has broken the staff of the wicked, the scepter of rulers, that struck the peoples in wrath with unceasing blows, that ruled the nations in anger with unrelenting persecution. The whole earth is at rest and quiet; they break forth into singing. The cypresses rejoice at you, the cedars of Lebanon, saying, ‘Since you were laid low, no woodcutter comes up against us.’ Sheol beneath is stirred up to meet you when you come; it rouses the shades to greet you, all who were leaders of the earth; it raises from their thrones all who were kings of the nations. All of them will answer and say to you: ‘You too have become as weak as we! You have become like us!’ Your pomp is brought down to Sheol, the sound of your harps; maggots are laid as a bed beneath you, and worms are your covers. How you are fallen from heaven, O Day Star, son of Dawn! How you are cut down to the ground, you who laid the nations low! You said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heaven; above the stars of God I will set my throne on high; I will sit on the mount of assembly in the far reaches of the north; I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.’ But you are brought down to Sheol, to the far reaches of the pit." (Isaiah 14:4-15, ESV)

After leaving Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God, the first thing that struck me about this passage was the fact that he had only used part of the passage. There are clear references within this passage to the DEATH of the person/entity being discussed. This, however, did NOT fit with Armstrong's narrative about an indestructible, immortal Satan! His solution to this glaring contradiction? Those parts of the passage only apply to the human king of Babylon! NO, sorry Mr. Armstrong, this passage clearly speaks of the ultimate and utter defeat and END of Satan! Moreover, it makes sense that the God who created this being would be able to destroy him. After all, we read in Scripture that only God has immortality (I Timothy 6:16)! Now, from what is revealed elsewhere in Scripture, it appears that angels have the ability to exist indefinitely. Even so, as created beings, they exist at the pleasure of their Creator!

In similar fashion, that passage from the book of Ezekiel reveals much more than Herbert Armstrong was willing to admit. After talking at some length about the "Prince of Tyre," the narrative changes to a discussion about the "King of Tyre" (Ezekiel 28:1-12). We read there: "You were the signet of perfection, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty. You were in Eden, the garden of God; every precious stone was your covering, sardius, topaz, and diamond, beryl, onyx, and jasper, sapphire, emerald, and carbuncle; and crafted in gold were your settings and your engravings. On the day that you were created they were prepared. You were an anointed guardian cherub. I placed you; you were on the holy mountain of God; in the midst of the stones of fire you walked. You were blameless in your ways from the day you were created, till unrighteousness was found in you. In the abundance of your trade you were filled with violence in your midst, and you sinned; so I cast you as a profane thing from the mountain of God, and I destroyed you, O guardian cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. Your heart was proud because of your beauty; you corrupted your wisdom for the sake of your splendor. I cast you to the ground; I exposed you before kings, to feast their eyes on you. By the multitude of your iniquities, in the unrighteousness of your trade you profaned your sanctuaries; so I brought fire out from your midst; it consumed you, and I turned you to ashes on the earth in the sight of all who saw you. All who know you among the peoples are appalled at you; you have come to a dreadful end and shall be no more forever." (Ezekiel 28:12-19, ESV) Now, that is plain language about Satan's fate! Moreover, as we will shortly demonstrate, it is entirely consistent with what is revealed on that subject in the New Testament!

In the New Testament, the temptation of Jesus Christ by Satan the Devil is mentioned in three of the Gospel narratives (Matthew 4:1-11, Mark 1:12-13, and Luke 4:1-13). Simply put, Jesus successfully rebutted three temptations put forward by Satan, and then commanded him to leave! Interestingly, both Jesus and Satan cited Scripture in their conversation with each other. Of course, Satan was twisting/perverting the text, and Christ was using it to refute Satan! Nevertheless, after reading these narratives, we have the clear sense that Satan gave it his best shot, and Christ didn't even flinch! In other words, Christ clearly defeated Satan.

Moreover, all four of the Gospel narratives portray Christ and his disciples as having complete authority over Satan's demonic kingdom. We find them casting out demons from possessed and afflicted people on numerous occasions in those writings. Indeed, at one point, after having been sent out to preach Christ's message, we read: "The seventy-two returned with joy, saying, 'Lord, even the demons are subject to us in your name!' And he said to them, 'I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven. Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall hurt you. Nevertheless, do not rejoice in this, that the spirits are subject to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven." (Luke 10:17-20, ESV) Clearly, Christ was portrayed here and elsewhere as having full authority over Satan and his demons.

On another occasion, Christ was accused of casting out demons because Satan had granted him that authority (Luke 11:14-15). Christ, however, quickly pointed out just how absurd such a notion was. He said: "Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and a divided household falls. And if Satan also is divided against himself, how will his kingdom stand? For you say that I cast out demons by Beelzebul. And if I cast out demons by Beelzebul, by whom do your sons cast them out? Therefore, they will be your judges. But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you. When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own palace, his goods are safe; but when one stronger than he attacks him and overcomes him, he takes away his armor in which he trusted and divides his spoil." (Luke 11:17-22, ESV) In other words, God and Christ were clearly stronger entities than Satan! Satan and his minions were in subjection to them, NOT the other way around!

On another occasion, after reprimanding the Jews for NOT following the example of obedience to God that Abraham had set for them, Jesus said: "If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and I am here. I came not of my own accord, but he sent me. Why do you not understand what I say? It is because you cannot bear to hear my word. You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies." (John 8:42-44, ESV) He was reminding them that Satan is a liar - that he had lied to their ancestors, Adam and Eve. Satan's only power was to lie and deceive and to cause hurt and harm. Indeed, later, in that same Gospel account, we are told that Satan influenced one of Christ's disciples to betray him (John 13:27, ESV)!

Now, from the other writings that make up the New Testament, it is also clear that Christ's apostles had the same perspective on Satan. We read in the book of Acts that Peter believed that Satan had inspired Ananias and his wife to lie about their contribution to the Church (Acts 5:3). And, just as in the story of Job, it appears that Paul felt that Satan was a tool that could be used to procure a positive spiritual outcome (I Corinthians 5:5). Even so, it is also clear that Paul understood Satan's power to deceive (I Corinthians 7:5, II Corinthians 2:11, 4:4, 11:14, Ephesians 2:2, II Thessalonians 2:9). In his own epistle, Peter warned Christians to "Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour..." (I Peter 5:8, ESV). Even so, he went on to reassure his audience that they would have the ultimate victory through Christ (I Peter 5:9-11).

Now, fortunately for us, someone in the First Century decided to write down some very important things about the Chistian perspective on the Hebrew Bible. For our purposes, the most important things revealed in that book have to do with the Angelic realm, and what Christ accomplished for us relative to Satan the Devil. In the first chapter of that epistle, it is revealed that Christ fulfills a role in God's plans that is vastly superior to the one played by angels. Indeed, their part is summed up nicely in the final verse of the chapter. Speaking about angels, we read: "Are they not all ministering spirits sent out to serve for the sake of those who are to inherit salvation?" (Hebrews 1:14, ESV)

Contrary to Mr. Armstrong's teachings in The Incredible Human Potential and Mystery of the Ages, in the second chapter of this epistle, we read: "For it was not to angels that God subjected the world to come, of which we are speaking." (Hebrews 2:5, ESV) The author goes on to reveal that humankind was tagged by God to inherit that "world to come" (Hebrews 2:6-10, ESV). Then, finally, we come to the critical passage: "Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same things, that through death he might DESTROY the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil, and deliver all those who through fear of death were subject to lifelong slavery." (Hebrews 2:14-15, ESV) Did you catch that? Christ shared in our flesh and blood to redeem us from the penalty for sin, death! Moreover, it is made very clear that he intended to accomplish that by destroying the one whose deception had prompted so many of us to sin!

Then, in chapters eight, nine and ten of this epistle, the anonymous author compares the High Priest of the Old Covenant with Jesus Christ as the High Priest of the New Covenant. For us, the critical part of this narrative is found in the ninth-and tenth-chapter's depiction of the symbolism surrounding the Day of Atonement. In this passage, we learn that the High Priest of the Old Covenant needed props in the form of some animal sacrifices and two goats. Unlike Christ, the human priest could not supply his own blood for the sins of the people, and he could not carry the peoples sins away from the camp. Moreover, rather than performing this ritual once each year, we are told that Christ permanently fulfilled its symbolism. We read: "For Christ has entered, not into holy places made with hands, which are copies of the true things, but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God on our behalf. Nor was it to offer himself repeatedly, as the high priest enters the holy places every year with blood not his own, for then he would have had to suffer repeatedly since the foundation of the world. But as it is, he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment, so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him." (Hebrews 9:24-28, ESV)

Continuing the thought, in the next chapter, we read: "For since the law has but a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true form of these realities, it can never, by the same sacrifices that are continually offered every year, make perfect those who draw near. Otherwise, would they not have ceased to be offered, since the worshipers, having once been cleansed, would no longer have any consciousness of sins? But in these sacrifices, there is a reminder of sins every year. For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins." (Hebrews 10:1-4, ESV) The thought concluded with this: "And every priest stands daily at his service, offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. But when Christ had offered for all time a single sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God, waiting from that time until his enemies should be made a footstool for his feet. For by a single offering, he has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified." (Hebrews 10:11-14, ESV)

Unfortunately, in this instance, Herbert Armstrong ignored his own axiom to let the Bible interpret itself. Mr. Armstrong taught that the second goat, the goat of removal, represented Satan the Devil! Ignoring this passage, and all of the other Scriptures pertinent to understanding the symbolism of the ceremony outlined in Leviticus 16, Herbert believed that Satan was ultimately responsible for ALL of the sins that had ever been committed, and that it was consequently just to place all of those sins back on his head.

Of course, he wouldn't have believed that if he'd employed a passage from Ezekiel in his understanding of this ritual. We read there: "The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father, nor the father suffer for the iniquity of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself." (Ezekiel 18:20, ESV) In other words, "the devil made me do it" isn't going to cut it on judgment day! In short, we should all understand that God laid all of our iniquity on Jesus Christ (Isaiah 53:6), and that he was the ONE designated to take away the sins of the world (John 1:29).

Interestingly, it is the book of Revelation that ties the scriptural narrative about Satan the Devil together (Genesis-Revelation). Indeed, in the twelfth chapter of that book, we find a historical narrative that outlines Satan's role in deceiving humankind and in trying to thwart God's plans. It's there that we find one of Mr. Armstrong's favorite passages: "And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world—he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him." (Revelation 12:9, ESV) Also, consistent with what is revealed about him in the Old Testament, we read in this chapter that Satan is the one who accuses Christians (Revelation 12:10). Notice too, that Christians are said to have conquered this entity through the blood of Christ (Revelation 12:11). Then, we read: "But woe to you, O earth and sea, for the devil has come down to you in great wrath, because he knows that his time is short!" (Revelation 12:12, ESV)

The following chapters outline Satan's role in inspiring and supporting the "Beast" and "Babylon" which are symbolic of human governance of this earth. Then, finally, in the twentieth chapter of this book, we come to the END of Satan's story (Revelation 20:1-10). Notice too, that his fate is NOT to have our sins placed on his head and to wander in the wilderness! Initially, he is bound with a "chain" and imprisoned in a "bottomless pit" (Revelation 20:1-3). Finally, when the thousand-year reign of Christ and his saints is finished, we are told that the Devil is released for a brief period and is, once again, allowed to deceive humanity (Revelation 20:7-8).

Satan's ultimate fate? We read that: "the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur" (Revelation 20:10) Remember too, that Christ had said that this everlasting fire had been prepared for the Devil and his angels (Matthew 25:41). Moreover, a little later, in this same passage from Revelation, we read: "Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire." (Revelation 20:13, ESV) I don't know about you, but that sure sounds eternal and final to me!

Hence, we see that Christ has already gained the victory over Satan and the death which he introduced into the world. Satan's doom is a forgone conclusion. Throughout history, he has only been permitted to do those things which God has allowed him to do. Moreover, it is apparent that God has used Satan to further his own plans to save humanity and give us eternal life with him! In other words, Satan is clearly NOT all that! 

  


 

Saturday, October 5, 2024

Why Would I Bother to Listen or Respond to Anything That Pervert Has to Say?

I've often asked myself that question in looking back at my dalliance with the teachings of Herbert Armstrong. More recently, however, I have found myself at the receiving end of this question from some of the supporters and former supporters of Armstrong's teachings. Of course, the perversity of the question itself is not lost on me when one considers the fact that Herbie was guilty of incest, sought sex therapy, and divorced his second wife. Nevertheless, the fact that I am a Christian who also happens to be a homosexual leads some folks to ignore or dismiss anything I have to say on the subject of religion.

First, for someone who has been writing this blog for over ten years with an average of one hundred and fifty views on any given day (OK, sometimes it's five hundred to a thousand, but that's rare), it is ridiculous to even suggest that I care about going viral or am lusting after popularity. Simply stated, as someone whose own spiritual journey has been fraught with deception and abuse, I have felt like I might have something to say that would help someone else on their own spiritual journey. Indeed, I have often found myself extremely gratified by a single private comment in response to one of my posts. After all, I am acutely aware of the fact that I don't have all of the answers, and that I haven't received a Divine commission to save the world.

Nevertheless, I have been very conscientious about trying to make a positive contribution to my faith, family, friends, community, and the world around me. There was a time when I would have added country to that list, but anyone who is familiar with my posts is aware that that impulse has faded over the years. At any rate, in order to be a credible voice, I have made an extraordinary effort to be honest and believable. Toward that end, although it isn't anyone's business, I have lived a celibate life for the last two decades. In other words, I have NOT taken advantage of the freedom which I believe that I have in Jesus Christ. I live my life in accordance with the more traditional notions of Christianity related to human sexuality. I have done so in order to immunize myself against the charge of acting and teaching in my own self-interest. Stated yet another way, I cannot be charged with hypocrisy if I'm living according to the dictates of the consciences of potential critics! To be blunter, there is NO "homosexual behavior" happening in my own life.

Even so, some of the folks who have accepted the words of an incestuous pedophile (Herbie) and/or the words of a lying, adulterous, egocentric bully (Donald Trump) are quick to dismiss or ignore what little old me has to say! It reminds me of something that Paul warned Timothy about so many years ago. He wrote: "For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching but having itching ears, they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions (II Timothy 4:3, ESV)." Oh well, if someone ignores or dismisses something out-of-hand, life is a lot easier - they don't have to actually answer or refute any challenges to their belief system! Yes, I completely understand. My thanks to those among you who have eyes to see and ears to hear and aren't afraid to entertain ideas which contradict your own beliefs.

Friday, October 4, 2024

Is It Love?

A friend recently sent me a link to an article from the Bible.org website titled All That Heaven Allows: Homosexuality and the Meaning of Love and solicited my opinion on it. The central thesis of the article is contained in the following paragraph: "We have just spoken about the need for love in the ethical debate over homosexuality. We live in a society that is obsessed with love. Our songs glorify it and our ads glamorize it. But the homosexual debate, probably more than any other issue, exposes a troublesome fact about our society: we don’t even agree about what love is. The central claim of the homosexual rights movement is that gays and lesbians should be allowed to love in their own way, and that a failure to accept them and their lifestyle as a permanent and open part of society is a failure to love. The central claim of all those who reject homosexuality is that it is an unacceptable way to express love. Thus, simply calling upon everyone to 'love' one another, without coming to some common understanding of what that means, will not solve the homosexual debate."

First, the focus of the Law of Christ is LOVE: Loving God with our whole heart and soul and loving each other as Christ loved us. Christ wants his followers to treat each other in the same fashion that they would like to be treated by others. This kind of LOVE seeks to minister to the needs of others - it is NOT self-seeking or self-justifying. Hence, it is fundamentally different from what our society is obsessed with!

Second, the central claim of the "homosexual rights movement" is NOT "that gays and lesbians should be allowed to love in their own way." What our community really wants is to be allowed to love in the very same way that heterosexuals love. Homosexuals want to be able to express their romantic feelings for another person in the same manner that heterosexuals express romantic feeling for their partners. Homosexuals want to be able to make the same commitment to their partner that heterosexuals are allowed to make to theirs. Hence, we are NOT seeking to love in a way that is different from the way that heterosexuals love their partners. In short, we want to be able to love our partners in exactly the same way that other folks love their partners! Moreover, the failure of society to permit homosexuals from doing so is inherently discriminatory and is NOT a reflection of the kind of love described in Scripture.

Third, Scripture defines the expression of love as showing patience, kindness, compassion, humility, and forgiveness to others (I Corinthians 13:4-7). That same passage precludes envy, boasting, rudeness, insisting on your own view being the standard for everyone else, rejoicing over the mistreatment of others, or cutting others off from your love. Indeed, Paul went on to say that true love never ends (I Corinthians 13:8)!

The article goes on to state that "the Old Testament Law specifies what behaviors and attitudes are inconsistent with love so we will not fool ourselves into thinking that we are exhibiting love when we are not. It also sets forth positive instruction in how we are to love one another in our marriages, families, friendships, and communities. Biblical morality is a morality of love, and nothing more or less..." NO, Jesus and Paul preached that "the Old Testament Law" is fulfilled by LOVE and was fulfilled by Jesus Christ (Matthew 5:17-20, 22:37-40 and Romans 13:8-10). Also, we must not forget that the Old Testament Law was directed at Israel - it was an integral part of God's covenant with THEM!

Even so, you will notice that ALL of the commandments related to male sexual behavior are directed at protecting their sexual partners, and the man himself, from hurt or harm (see Leviticus 18 and 20). Moreover, we can easily discern the application of this principle in commandments like those that forbid incest, bestiality, and adultery. In other words, the harm to both of the participants in the prohibited behavior is (or should be) obvious to everyone.

What about those commandments related to homosexual behaviors? I would answer that question this way: If we understand the behavior(s) which the author intended, we should be able to clearly discern the hurt/harm inherent to the prohibited behavior. In this respect, we could say that prohibited sexual behaviors (those of both a heterosexual and homosexual nature) were intended to protect the Israelites from hurting/harming themselves or someone else. Thus, when we understand that rape is always wrong, and that it would be especially onerous to treat guests in such a way, we begin to see the hurt and harm that the Sodomites wanted to inflict on their angelic visitors! In other words, what the Sodomites had in mind did NOT involve love, fidelity, or hospitality, and it should be clear that such behavior could have inflicted great harm on everyone (especially the visitors)!

Now, let's take a look at a couple of those Torah commandments. The two most prominent texts targeting homosexual activity are found in Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13. First, we should note that these commandments, as were most of the other commandments found in Torah, were addressed specifically to the MEN of Israel. 

Moreover, in order to understand the context of these commandments it is crucial that we have some awareness of the sexual culture of the ancient peoples of the Middle East. In short, it was common practice to involve both male and female prostitution in the worship of pagan gods. Likewise, it was not uncommon for adult males to engage in pederasty (sexual relationships with male children). Finally, both male and female slaves were often forced to have sexual relations with their owners. Hopefully, we can all see that these types of homosexual behaviors are NOT consistent with loving one's neighbor and doing no harm to him.

We should also note that these ancient peoples had a very limited understanding of the workings of the human body and mind. For example, our modern notion of a "sexual orientation" or "sexual preference" would have been wholly unknown to them! Likewise, they were completely unaware of the presence and workings of hormones like estrogen and testosterone. Hence, it is reasonable to conclude that the same-sex behavior being confronted in these commandments is consistent with the types of behaviors which were common to that time and place! After all, I would defy anyone to identify any hurt or harm associated with two adults enjoying coitus within the context of a loving, consensual relationship.

Moreover, the foundational Ten Words/Commandments of Torah makes infidelity/unfaithfulness a sin within the context of any committed relationship (see Exodus 20:14). What's more, once again, we can clearly discern how infidelity could inflict real hurt on your partner, family, self, and the likelihood that it would do the same to your partner in crime and his/her spouse and family. Finally, I sincerely hope that no one would be foolish enough to suggest that this standard was intended to only apply to heterosexual males. How much sense does it make to suggest that the same standard (fidelity) doesn't apply to females or homosexuals? Is anyone seriously going to suggest that those other groups were exempted from being faithful? Doesn't that strike all of us as being just a little bit absurd? After all, if we truly love someone, does it make sense that we would want to pursue someone else to satisfy our personal lust or need for intimacy?

Now, while most of us understand that Christians are NOT under the Law of Moses - that we are saved by grace and faith within the context of Jesus Christ (and that we are expected to operate within the bounds of the Law of Christ going forward), some will point to a couple of passages in the New Testament to suggest that ALL homosexual behavior is SIN (By the way, hopefully, NO ONE is suggesting that ALL heterosexual behavior is righteous)! Of course, in this connection, EVERYONE must admit that Jesus of Nazareth was SILENT on the subject of homosexuality!

Nevertheless, we read in Paul's epistle to the Romans that "God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error." (Romans 1:26-27, ESV) Once again, the context of those times was temple prostitution, pederasty, and sexual exploitation of slaves. Moreover, I would submit that all three of those homosexual behaviors are inconsistent with both our own natures and the Law of Christ, and that the resulting hurt/harm should be obvious to all of us!

Likewise, Paul's warning to the saints at Corinth about unrighteous behavior excluding those who indulge in it from God's Kingdom (I Corinthians 6:9). Once again, without the context of the sexual behaviors and knowledge of the folks of that time, the passage is rendered undecipherable! In other words, it is a gross mischaracterization of these passages to say that they exclude all homosexual behaviors!

Thus, we can see that LOVE IS LOVE. Christians (straight or gay) are subject to the SAME moral standards in Scripture. Indeed, it is ridiculous to suggest that there is one standard for heterosexuals and another for homosexuals. Love fulfills the requirements of the Law. If love is absent there is sin. If love is absent, there is hurt and harm. If your nature is to be attracted to males, then it would be contrary to that nature to have sexual relations with a woman (and it would be inherently unfair and hurtful to her). Now, there are many things in Scripture that are difficult to understand, this is NOT one of them!

Thursday, October 3, 2024

The Feast of Trumpets

Although Christians are NOT obligated to observe this festival, there is much in it that relates to Jesus Christ and has deep meaning for his disciples. Jews call this festival Rosh Hashanah. For them, it is the "Head of the Year" - their New Year. It is also the day which they believe that God created both the universe and Adam and Eve. (see Chabad.org: What Is Rosh Hashanah?) In Torah, it is referred to as "a day of solemn rest, a memorial proclaimed with blast of trumpets, a holy convocation." (Leviticus 23:24, ESV) In addition to all of this, the Israelites were instructed to "present a food offering to the Lord." (Leviticus 23:25, ESV)

Now, first, it is important to understand that ALL of the various elements of Torah (Sabbaths, festivals, sacrifices/offerings, rituals, ceremonies, clean/unclean, etc.) pointed to Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus said that he came to this earth to fulfill Torah and the prophets. Likewise, Paul told the saints at Colossae that things like Sabbaths, festivals and New Moons were shadows of future things, and that Christ was the reality to which they pointed. Moreover, the epistle to the Hebrews makes clear that the Sabbath, priesthood, sacrifices, and ceremonies related to the Tabernacle, Holy of Holies, and Day of Atonement pointed to the reality found in Jesus of Nazareth.

Hence, returning to the Jewish meaning of the day, we can see how Jesus is the "Head of the Year" - the start of a new life, age, and kingdom! In similar fashion, we know that the New Testament reveals that God created all things through Jesus Christ. Likewise, we know that Christ is referred to in the New Testament as the bread of life - that his body is real food, and we know that he offered himself to God for us! Once again, we are told that Christ is the ultimate Sabbath. He is the One who makes it possible for us to truly rest from our own works. Finally, the New Testament clearly associated the blowing of trumpets with the tribulation prior to his return, the announcement of his return, and the resurrection of those whom he has already redeemed from death. Moreover, by definition, the ekklesia is an assembly of Christ's disciples. In the truest sense of the word, it is a Holy convocation!

Thus, we see that the blasting of Trumpets clearly found fulfillment in the person of Jesus of Nazareth. In short, this Festival points to Christ's creation of this world, and the fact that he will eventually do away with the very flawed human systems (religious and political) extant in our times.