Tuesday, October 27, 2020

The Supreme God

Longtime readers of this blog know that I have largely avoided discussions about Trinitarianism, Binitarianism or Unitarianism. And, although I am still uncomfortable with being labeled as an adherent of one of those perspectives, I have reached some personal conclusions about the Scriptural teachings on the subject. Moreover, as with most of the other aspects of Christian theology, I find some merit in all three perspectives on the nature of God. Now, I realize that this will seem like waffling to more dogmatically inclined Christians, but we would all do well to remember that all three perspectives claim the Bible as the source of their understanding. Hence, if Scripture was as clear on the subject as the adherents of each of these various beliefs claim, then there wouldn't be three different Christian perspectives on the nature of God!

Of course, it would also be disingenuous not to admit that the Trinitarian view is the most widely held perspective within traditional Christianity. And, even many of those who profess to follow the other two perspectives (Binitarianism and Unitarianism) will acknowledge that both Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit proceed from God and reflect God's persona. Hence, the heart of the question is how all of these folks reconcile all of this with Hebrew notions of a monotheistic deity.

I would say that, whatever one believes about the nature of Christ or the nature of the Holy Spirit, the New Testament is quite clear that there is ONE SUPREME GOD. Hence, regardless of what one believes about whether there is one - two or three entities in the Godhead, the New Testament makes very plain that there is only ONE entity who is Supreme.

In all four of the gospel accounts, Jesus refers to this entity as his Father (see Matthew 7:21, 10:32, 33, 11:27, 12:50, 16:17, 18:10, 19, 20:23, 24:36, 25:34, 26:39, 42, 53, Mark 13:32, Luke 10:22, 22:29, 24:49, John 5:17, 6:32, 65, 8:19, 28, 38, 49, 54, 10:17, 18, 29, 30, 32, 37, 12:26, 14:7, 12, 20, 21, 23, 28, 15:1, 8, 15, 23, 24, 16:10, 18:11, 20:17 and 21). And, as any serious student of the Judeo-Christian Scriptures knows, a good son honors and obeys his father - is in subjection to his father.

This fact is further reinforced by Christ's own statements. We read in the Gospel According to John: "Therefore the Jews sought all the more to kill Him, because He not only broke the Sabbath, but also said that God was His Father, making Himself equal with God. Then Jesus answered and said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of Himself, but what He sees the Father do; for whatever He does, the Son also does in like manner. For the Father loves the Son, and shows Him all things that He Himself does; and He will show Him greater works than these, that you may marvel. For as the Father raises the dead and gives life to them, even so the Son gives life to whom He will. For the Father judges no one, but has committed all judgment to the Son, that all should honor the Son just as they honor the Father. He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him." -John 5:18-23 Christ clearly believed that he was doing what his Father wanted him to do. Was Christ really making himself equal with God as the Jews alleged?

A little later in this same account, we have Christ telling his disciples: "These things I have spoken to you while being present with you. But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you. Peace I leave with you, My peace I give to you; not as the world gives do I give to you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid. You have heard Me say to you, ‘I am going away and coming back to you.’ If you loved Me, you would rejoice because I said, ‘I am going to the Father,’ for My Father is greater than I." -John 14:25-28 Notice that Christ believed that the Father had the authority to "send" the Holy Spirit, and that he acknowledged that his Father was greater than him!

That his Father was in a superior position is further underscored by what Christ revealed in his famous prophecy from the Mount of Olives which he gave to his disciples. Speaking about the timing of the fulfillment of his prophecies, he said, "But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father." -Mark 13:32 In other words, the timing was in the hands of an entity who was superior to him and all others!

Finally, this concept is further reinforced by the Apostle Paul in his first letter to the saints at Corinth. Paul wrote: "But now Christ is risen from the dead, and has become the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. For since by man came death, by Man also came the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive. But each one in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, afterward those who are Christ’s at His coming. Then comes the end, when He delivers the kingdom to God the Father, when He puts an end to all rule and all authority and power. For He must reign till He has put all enemies under His feet. The last enemy that will be destroyed is death. For “He has put all things under His feet.” But when He says “all things are put under Him,” it is evident that He who put all things under Him is excepted. Now when all things are made subject to Him, then the Son Himself will also be subject to Him who put all things under Him, that God may be all in all." -I Corinthians 15:20-28 Clearly, Paul believed that Christ regarded the Father as Supreme.

Hence, whatever one believes about the nature of Jesus Christ or the Holy Spirit or about humans becoming part of God's family, it is clear that there has always been and always will be ONE SUPREME GOD. No other entity has ever or will ever usurp that position. That there is one Almighty God is the clear teaching of the New Testament, and any suggestion that any other entity is or ever will be on that level is just plain blasphemy! 

5 comments:

  1. It all comes down to an understanding of what God is.

    In Hindu religion they have Atman, all the so called millions of hindu gods are manifestations of that Supreme principle.

    Sanskrit Atman is also close to germanic Atmen, breathing, suggestion of wind, like Hebrew Ruach, wind/spirit.

    Oh if only the Roman church had not defeated the Visigoths, we would be thinking Arianism would be supreme.

    Nck

    ReplyDelete
  2. nck's comments (and my responses) on the previous post are also relevant to this one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "It all comes down to an understanding of what God is."

    Existence that multiplied itself
    For sheer delight of being
    And plunged into numberless trillions of forms
    So that it might
    Find
    Itself
    Innumerably

    From the Indian philosopher, Sri Aurobindo

    ReplyDelete
  4. The following comment was posted to my private e-mail:

    Well said.
    I think, too, that we humans sometimes have this inclination to quantify and classify and describe everything, which may not necessarily be a bad thing in most cases, but is perhaps inadequate for trying to apprehend God. I'm reminded of Paul's words in II Corinthians 12:4. He said he was caught up into paradise and experienced "things that cannot be put into words." Can't we just live with a certain level of uncertainty? Isn't there so much we just don't know? So why try to be dogmatic and doctrinaire instead of being humble?
    Thanks for making us think.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I just love DBP's quote for the sake of philosophy. It is much easier to comprehend than the notion of why such a happy being reproducing itself would come up with us.

    I also like the e-mail comment.
    It resonates with my elaboration on the creative teamwork process in tech.

    However, I am not inclined to take the level of uncertainty into the realm of "mystery".

    As John Adams wrote to Abigail after his round of visiting all sects and denominations in Philadelphia:

    "I was led by curiousity and good company (including george washington) to cross a." Romish treshhold". to attend mass at St Mary's at 5th.

    Everything about the service was the antithesis of a lifetime of Sabbaths at Brainstree's plain first church, where unfettered daylight through clear window glass allowed for no dark or shadowed corners, or suggestions of mystery.

    (For the first time Adams was confronted with so much that so much that generations of his people had abhorred and rebelled against, and he found himself both distressed abd strangely moved.

    "The music, bells, candles, gold and silver were" so calculated to take in mankind", that he wondered the Reformation had ever succeeded.

    He felt pity for *the poor wretches fingering their beads, chanting Latin, not a word of which they understood, " he told Abigail.


    He said however. The singing and chanting continued" most sweetly and exquisitly' and he approved of the priests short moral essay on the duty of parents toward their children.

    The whole experience was "awful and affecting" then meaning "full of awe" or fills with reverence.

    For a plain lawyer from the country he had not seen elegant dinners in New York like the ones in Philadelphia.

    "Even plain Quakers, he reported served ducks, hams, chickens, beef, creams, and custards........................

    Speak about the dinners we/wcg served to thousands of diplomats around the world toward the goal of "peace" as promoted by "the one of Quaker stock."

    Anyway why did I include this last paragraph?

    Perhaps "peace/pax" is the language of empires, and the NT warns about that word, in my opinion the Universe seeks balance......... which enhances my point on scrum, lean agile team/family rulership in "the Kingdom", rather than hierarchical.

    What upset me most in the past was the hammering on the verses that said that "peace would be brought with a rod of iron." I don't believe that.

    I believe in balance, therefore my endorsement of DBP that the initiative for federal aid, when everyone dies should lie with the States not the Feds.

    Nck

    ReplyDelete